Major military efforts were taken by Kublai Khan of the Yuan dynasty in 1274 and 1281 to conquer the Japanese archipelago after the submission of the Korean kingdom of Goryeo to vassaldom. Ultimately a failure, the invasion attempts are of macro-historical importance because they set a limit on Mongol expansion and rank as nation-defining events in the history of Japan. The invasions are referred to in many works of fiction and are the earliest events for which the word kamikaze (神風 "divine wind") is widely used, originating in reference to the two typhoons faced by the Yuan fleets. The invasions were one of the earliest cases of gunpowder warfare outside of China. One of the most notable technological innovations during the war was the use of explosive, hand-thrown bombs.[7] Background See also: Mongol invasions and conquests and Mongol military tactics and organization After a series of Mongol invasions of Korea between 1231 and 1281, Goryeo signed a treaty in favor of the Mongols and became a vassal state. Kublai was declared Khagan of the Mongol Empire in 1260 (although that was not widely recognized by the Mongols in the west) and established his capital at Khanbaliq (within modern Beijing) in 1264.[citation needed] Japan was then ruled by the Shikken (shogunate regents) of the Hōjō clan, who had intermarried with and wrested control from Minamoto no Yoriie, shōgun of the Kamakura shogunate, after his death in 1203. The inner circle of the Hōjō clan had become so pre-eminent that they no longer consulted the council of the shogunate (Hyōjō (評定)), the Imperial Court of Kyoto, or their gokenin vassals, and they made their decisions at private meetings in their residences (yoriai (寄合)).[citation needed] The Mongols also made attempts to subjugate the native peoples of Sakhalin, the Ainu and Nivkh peoples, from 1264 to 1308.[8] However, it is doubtful if Mongol activities in Sakhalin were part of the effort to invade Japan.[9] Contact Letter from Kublai Khan of the "Great Mongol State" (大蒙古國) to the "King of Japan" (日本國王), written in Classical Chinese, the lingua franca in East Asia at the time, dated 8th Month, 1266. Now stored in Tōdai-ji, Nara, Japan. From 1266 to 1273, a diplomatic mission composed of Mongols and Koreans sent envoys to Japan six times to demand submission to the Mongols, but the Japanese ignored their demands.[10][11] In 1265, a Goryeo citizen told Kublai that the Mongols should bring Japan to vassalage. Kublai agreed and appointed Heuk Chŭk and Eun Hong as envoys to Japan. They were ordered to go to Goryeo and take with them a Goryeo envoy as well. They delivered a message to the Wonjong of Goryeo and two of his officials, Son Kun-bi and Kim Ch'an, were appointed to join them on their journey. On their departure, they were met by a storm and the king sent the Mongol envoys back to the Yuan court. Kublai was unsatisfied with the outcome and sent Heuk Chŭk back ordering Wonjong to forward the Mongol envoy to Japan.[12] Yi Changyong, a Goryeo minister, attempted to dissuade the Mongols from their plans on Japan.[13] Kublai sent a general, U-ya Son-dal, to demand that Yi Changyong and Kim Chun, the two most influential officials of Goryeo, be brought to the Yuan court. Kim killed U-ya Son-dal. This frightened Wonjong, who did not want to offend the Mongols, but he dared not lay a hand on Kim. Having gone unpunished, Kim and his family started showing disrespect towards the king. Wonjong and Im Yŏn, an official who hated Kim, summoned him to court and killed him.[14] Upon reaching the Japanese capital, the Mongol and Goryeo envoys were treated with disrespect and were not allowed to enter the gates. They lodged at a place called T'ă-jă-bu outside the west gate of the city. They remained there for five months with poor entertainment before being dismissed without receiving an answer. Kublai could not believe that his envoys had been treated with such disrespect and suspected that this was a ruse by Wonjong, so he sent Heuk Chŭk back to Japan, this time accompanied by the Goryeo envoy, Sim Sa-jŭn. The envoys had not returned by 1268 but ultimately left after their letter was rejected by the Japanese.[15][16] The letter stated: The Emperor of the Great Mongols, being commissioned by Heaven, hereby respectfully presents a letter to the King of Japan. From time immemorial rulers of small states, the borders of which closely adjoin, have always endeavoured to maintain friendly relations with each other and have manifested mutual respect and trust. On our part, we, from the time of our forefathers, have received the Mandate of Heaven and have ruled the universe. Innumerable people in far-off lands have learned to fear our power and have longed for our virtuous rule. When we first ascended the throne, the innocent and helpless people of Korea had suffered for long from military struggles. We therefore ordered a cessation of hostilities, restored their land, and returned the captive Koreans, young and old. In gratitude both ruler and people of Korea now present themselves at our court. Although the legal relation between ourselves and the Koreans is that of sovereign and subjects, yet in feeling we are as father and children. We assume that Your Highness and your subjects have known this. Korea is our eastern tributary state. Japan is located near to Korea and since her founding has time and again established relations with the Middle Kingdom. However, since our accession you have not yet sent an envoy to our court; nor have you indicated a desire to establish friendly relations with us. We are afraid this is because Your Kingdom has not yet been well informed of this. Therefore we now send a special envoy bearing our state papers to inform you of our desire. We hope that henceforth you will enter into friendly relations with us, and that both our people and yours will enjoy peace and harmony. Moreover, the sages consider the entire universe one family. Therefore, if we should not establish friendly relations with each other, how could it be in accordance with the doctrine of one family? Who would care to appeal to arms? I hereby leave the matter to Your Highness’s careful consideration.[17][nb 1] In early 1269, another mission of 70 Koreans and Mongols arrived on Tsushima demanding an answer from Japan to the khan's letter. The imperial court wished to respond but the Kamakura shogunate overruled them. A letter rejecting the Mongol demands was drafted but never delivered.[18] In late 1270, a final mission was dispatched by Kublai to Japan. The mission was led by Zhao Liangbi and consisted of 24 scribes. They were almost immediately attacked upon arrival in Japan in 1271. They were refused a visit to the "king of Japan". After delivering their letter and receiving no reply, they went home. Zhao waited for a response until 1273 before returning to China. Zhao advised Kublai against attacking Japan because even though the country lacked wealth, the people were warlike.[17][19] Japan took seriously the letter brought by the second diplomatic mission to Japan in 1268 as an omen of invasion; Shinto shrines and Buddhist temples were instructed to pray for the repulsion of foreign troops and the central government suspended most of its normal duties to concentrate on fortifying its existing defenses in Kyushu.[10] First invasion preparations Two Samurai with a dead Mongol at their feet. The one on the right is possibly Sō Sukekuni, the defending commander at Tsushima. Votive image (ema) at the Komodahama Shrine at Sasuura on Tsushima. In April 1274, the Yuan instructed Holdon and Hong Dagu to mobilize 15,000 men for the invasion of Japan. The Korean general Kim Panggyong led a force of 30,500 to build ships in the fashion of the Southern Chinese. A man from Shandong named Qi Gongzhi who helped Kublai design ships was ordered to Korea where he spent a few months before being sent to Xiangyang for the invasion of southern China. Three types of ships were constructed: 300 large thousand dan ships, 300 batulu fast boats, and 300 tenders. Hong Dagu was put in charge of the construction of large transports while Chaqu supervised the construction of the batulu fast boats. Goryeo was responsible for providing the labor, material, and cost of the construction, which they protested. The construction was finished on 5 July 1274.[20] The invasion fleet was scheduled to depart in the seventh lunar month of 1274 but was delayed for three months due to the death of Wonjong on 23 July and Holdon and Liu Fuheng's tardiness. They did not arrive until September.[21][2][3] Kublai planned for the fleet to first attack Tsushima Island and Iki Island before making landfall in Hakata Bay. The Japanese plan of defense was simply to contest them at every point with gokenin. Both Yuan and Japanese sources exaggerate the opposing side's numbers, with the History of Yuan putting the Japanese at 102,000, and the Japanese claiming they were outnumbered at least ten to one. In reality, there are no reliable records of the size of Japanese forces, but estimates put their total numbers at around 4,000 to 6,000. The Yuan invasion force was composed of 15,000 Mongol, Han Chinese, and Jurchen soldiers, 6,000 to 8,000 Korean troops, and 7,000 Korean sailors.[2][3] A story widely known in Japan is that back in Kamakura, Tokimune was overcome with fear when the invasion finally came and wanting to overcome his cowardice, he asked Mugaku Sogen, his Zen master, also known as Bukkō, for advice. Bukkō replied that he had to sit in meditation to find the source of his cowardice in himself. Tokimune went to Bukkō and said, "Finally there is the greatest happening of my life." Bukkō asked, "How do you plan to face it?" Tokimune screamed, "Katsu!" as if he wanted to scare all the enemies in front of him. Bukkō responded with satisfaction, "It is true that the son of a lion roars as a lion!"[22] Since then, Tokimune was instrumental in spreading Zen and Bushido in Japan among the samurai. First invasion (1274) Main article: Battle of Bun'ei Samurai Mitsui Sukenaga (right) defeating the Mongolian invasion army (left) The Mongol fleet destroyed in a typhoon, ink and water on paper, by Kikuchi Yōsai, 1847 Invasion of Tsushima The Yuan invasion forces set off from Hoppo (Chinese: 合浦, now Masan, South Gyeongsang Province, Korea) on 2 November 1274 (Dōngyuè 5 in the Chinese calendar).[23][24][25] Two days later they began landing on Tsushima Island. The principal landing was made at Komoda beach near Sasuura, on the northwestern tip of the southern island of Shimono. Additional landings occurred in the strait between the two islands of Tsushima, as well as at two points on the northern island of Kamino.[26] The following description of events is based on contemporary Japanese sources, notably the Sō Shi Kafu, a history of the Sō clan of Tsushima. At Sasuura, the invasion fleet was spotted offshore, allowing the deputy governor (jitodai) Sō Sukekuni to organize a hasty defense. On that day, the shrine to Hachiman caught fire, which would have been an omen of bad luck, but Sukekuni interpreted it as an omen of warning.[26] With 80 mounted samurai and their retinue, Sukekuni confronted an invasion force of what the Sō Shi Kafu describes as 8,000 warriors embarked on 900 ships.[27] The Mongols landed at 02:00 in the morning on 4 November and ignored the Japanese negotiation attempts, shooting with their archers and forcing them to retreat. The fight was engaged by 04:00.[27] The small garrison force was quickly defeated, but according to the Sō Shi Kafu, one samurai, Sukesada, cut down 25 enemy soldiers in individual combat.[28] The invaders defeated a final Japanese cavalry charge around nightfall.[28][27] After their victory at Komoda, the Yuan forces burnt down most of the buildings around Sasuura and slaughtered most of the inhabitants. They took the next few days to secure control of Tsushima.[27] Invasion of Iki Island The Yuan fleet departed Tsushima on 13 November and attacked Iki Island. Like Sukekuni, Taira no Kagetaka, the governor of Iki, gave a spirited defence with 100 samurai and the local armed populace before falling back to his castle by nightfall. The next morning, Yuan forces had surrounded the castle. Knowing that defeat was inevitable, Kagetaka sent his daughter with a trusted samurai, Sōzaburō, on a secret passage to the shore where a ship was waiting to take them to the mainland. Mongol archers spotted them and fired on the ship; Kagetaka's daughter was killed, but Sōzaburō managed to reach Hakata Bay and report Iki's defeat.[29] Kagetaka made a final failed sortie with 36 men, 30 of whom died in battle, before committing suicide with his family.[30] According to the Japanese, the Mongols held down the surviving women and stabbed them through their palms with knives, stripped them naked, and tied their corpses to the sides of their ships to demonstrate to other Japanese what their fate would be if they did not surrender.[31] Landing in Hakata Bay The Yuan fleet crossed the sea and landed in Hakata Bay on 19 November, a short distance from Dazaifu, the ancient administrative capital of Kyūshū. The following day brought the Battle of Bun'ei (文永の役), also known as the "First Battle of Hakata Bay". Conlan argues that the History of Yuan's account of the battle suggests that both the Japanese and Yuan forces were of similar size. Conlan estimates that both armies numbered around 3,000 each (not including the Yuan sailors) during this battle[32] while Japanese historians estimate 6,000 defenders on the Japanese side.[33] The Japanese forces, being inexperienced with non-Japanese tactics, found the Mongol army perplexing. The Yuan forces disembarked and advanced in a dense body protected by a screen of shields. They wielded their polearms in a tightly packed fashion with no space between them. As they advanced they also threw paper and iron casing bombs on occasion, frightening the Japanese horses and making them uncontrollable in battle. When the grandson of a Japanese commander shot an arrow to announce the beginning of battle, the Mongols burst out laughing.[34] The commanding general kept his position on high ground, and directed the various detachments as need be with signals from hand-drums. But whenever the (Mongol) soldiers took to flight, they sent iron bomb-shells (tetsuho) flying against us, which made our side dizzy and confused. Our soldiers were frightened out of their wits by the thundering explosions; their eyes were blinded, their ears deafened, so that they could hardly distinguish east from west. According to our manner of fighting, we must first call out by name someone from the enemy ranks, and then attack in single combat. But they (the Mongols) took no notice at all of such conventions; they rushed forward all together in a mass, grappling with any individuals they could catch and killing them.[35] — Hachiman Gudōkun The History of Yuan gives a similar but shorter account: Occupying the heights, his generals gave command by beating drums and the troops advanced or retreated according to the beat of the drums. When the enemy had moved into the pre-arranged positions, the invaders attacked from all sides. They also used firearms and [thus] slaughtered the enemy forces in countless numbers. Thus the Japanese were put to rout.[36] — History of Yuan The battle lasted for only a day, and the fighting, though fierce, was uncoordinated and brief.[37] One low-ranking samurai, Takezaki Suenaga, received word from his commander Shōni Kagesuke that he was to wait until the Mongols advanced due to difficult terrain, but Takezaki attacked the Mongols anyway. On his way to the beach, he encountered Kikuchi Takefusa, who had already encountered a Yuan detachment, driven them away and killed two. Kikuchi told him the "pirates" had already fled. Takezaki and his five companions charged the small Yuan detachment that Kikuchi had previously encountered, but their horses got stuck in the mud, and they were wounded by a barrage of arrows. Takezaki and three surviving retainers managed to retreat with the aid of Shiroishi Michiyasu, who charged the Yuan detachment and drove them away.[38][39] By nightfall the Yuan invasion force had forced the Japanese off the beach with a third of the defending forces dead, driving them several kilometres inland, and burning Hakata.[40] The Japanese were preparing to make a last stand at Mizuki (water castle), an earthwork moat fort dating back to 664.[41] However the Yuan attack never came. One of the three commanding Yuan generals, Liu Fuxiang (Yu-Puk Hyong), was shot in the face by the retreating samurai, Shōni Kagesuke, and seriously injured. Liu convened with the other generals Holdon and Hong Dagu back on his ship. Holdon wanted to keep advancing through the night before more Japanese reinforcements arrived, but Hong was worried that their troops were too exhausted and needed rest. There was also fear of being ambushed in the night. Liu agreed with Hong and recalled the Yuan forces back to their ships.[42] Disappearance of the invaders By morning, most of the Yuan ships had disappeared. According to a Japanese courtier in his diary entry for 6 November 1274, a sudden reverse wind from the east blew back the Yuan fleet. A few ships were beached, and some 50 Yuan soldiers and sailors were captured and executed. According to the History of Yuan, "a great storm arose and many warships were dashed on the rocks and destroyed."[43] It is not certain whether the storm occurred at Hakata or if the fleet had already set sail for Korea and encountered it on their way back. Some accounts offer casualty reports that suggest 200 ships were lost. Of the 30,000 strong invasion force, 13,500 did not return.[44] Second invasion preparations A stone defense wall (Genkō Bōrui) at Nishijin, near Seinan University. Currently, only the top of a few stone walls are exposed to the ground, and most of them have been reclaimed. A stake driven into the mouth of a river to prevent the Mongol army from landing. It was excavated in 1905 (Genkō Museum). After the invasion of 1274, the shogunate made efforts to defend against a second invasion, which they thought was sure to come. They better organized the samurai of Kyūshū and ordered the construction of forts and a large stone wall (石塁, Sekirui or 防塁, Bōrui) and other defensive structures at many potential landing points, including Hakata Bay, where a two-meter (6.6 ft) high wall was constructed in 1276.[45] In addition, a large number of stakes were driven into the mouth of the river and the expected landing sites to prevent the Mongol army from landing. Kublai Khan sent five Yuan emissaries in September 1275 to Kyūshū, who refused to leave without a reply. Tokimune responded by having them sent to Kamakura and then beheading them.[46] The graves of those five executed Yuan emissaries still exist at Jōryū-ji, in Fujisawa, Kanagawa, near the Tatsunokuchi Execution Place in Kamakura.[47] Five more Yuan emissaries were sent on 29 July 1279, in the same manner, and were again beheaded, this time in Hakata. In the autumn of 1280, Kublai held a conference at his summer palaces to discuss plans for a second invasion of Japan. The major difference between the first and the second invasion was that the Yuan dynasty had finished conquering the Song dynasty in 1279 and was able to launch a two-pronged attack. The invading force was drawn from several sources, including criminals with commuted death sentences and even those mourning the loss of their parents—a serious affair in China. More than 1,500 ships were requisitioned for the invasion: 600 from southern China and 900 from Korea. Reportedly 40,000 troops were amassed in Korea and 100,000 in southern China. Those numbers are likely an exaggeration, but the addition of southern Chinese resources probably meant the second invasion force was still several times larger than the first invasion. Nothing is known about the size of the Japanese forces.[4] Second invasion (1281) Main article: Battle of Kōan Attacks on Tsushima and Iki Orders for the second invasion came in the first lunar month of 1281. Two fleets were prepared, a force of 900 ships in Korea and 3,500 ships in southern China with a combined force of 142,000 soldiers and sailors.[32] The Mongol general Arakhan was named supreme commander of the operation and was to travel with the Southern Route fleet, which was under the command of Fan Wenhu but was delayed by supply difficulties.[48] The Eastern Route army set sail first from Korea on 22 May and attacked Tsushima on 9 June and Iki Island on 14 June. According to the History of Yuan, the Japanese commander Shōni Suketoki and Ryūzōji Suetoki led forces against the invasion force. The expeditionary forces discharged their firearms, and the Japanese were routed, with Suketoki killed in the process. More than 300 islanders were killed. The Yuan soldiers sought out the children and killed them as well. However, the History of Yuan merges events in June with the later battle in July, when Shōni Suketoki actually fell in battle.[49] Landings in Nagato and Hakata Bay Japanese samurai boarding Yuan ships in 1281. The defensive wall at Hakata The Eastern Route army was supposed to wait for the Southern Route army at Iki, but their commanders, Hong Dagu and Kim Bang-gyeong, disobeyed orders and set out to invade Mainland Japan by themselves. They departed on 23 June, a full week ahead of the expected arrival of the Southern Route army on 2 July. The Eastern Route army split their forces in half and simultaneously attacked Hakata Bay and Nagato Province. Three hundred ships attacked Nagato on 25 June but were driven off and forced to return to Iki.[49] Meanwhile, the rest of the Eastern Route army attacked Hakata Bay, which was heavily fortified with a defensive wall. Some Mongol ships came ashore but were unable to make it past the defensive wall and were driven off by volleys of arrows.[50] Japanese counterattacks and Mongol withdrawal Unable to land, the Mongol invasion force occupied the islands of Shika and Noko from which it had planned to launch raids against Hakata. Instead, the Japanese launched raids at night on board small ships. The Hachiman Gudōkun credit Kusano Jirō with boarding a Mongol ship, setting fire to it, and taking 21 heads.[51] The next day, Kawano Michiari led a daytime raid with just two boats. His uncle Michitoki was immediately killed by an arrow, and Michiari was wounded both in the shoulder and the left arm. However, upon boarding the enemy ship, he slew a large Mongol warrior for which he was made a hero and richly rewarded. Takezaki Suenaga was also among those who raided the Yuan fleet.[52] Takezaki also participated in driving the Mongols from Shika island, although in that instance, he was wounded and forced them to withdraw to Iki on 30 June.[53] The Japanese defence of Hakata Bay is known as the Battle of Kōan. On 16 July, fighting commenced between the Japanese and Mongols at Iki Island, resulting in Mongol withdrawal to Hirado Island.[54] Stalemate at Hakata After the Southern Route fleet convened with the Eastern Route fleet, the two fleets took some time rearranging themselves before they advanced on Taka island. After taking Taka island, the Yuan army advanced on Hakata. A two-week battle ensued throughout the countryside that entered a stalemate.[55] On 12 August, the Japanese repeated their small raids on the invasion fleet that lasted throughout the night. The Mongols responded by fastening their ships together with chains and planks to provide defensive platforms. There are no accounts of the raids from the Japanese side in this incident unlike at the defence of Hakata Bay. According to the History of Yuan, the Japanese ships were small and were all beaten off:[55][56] Japanese war craft, being small in size, were no match [for these ships]. Those which came up to attack were all beaten off. The whole country therefore was trembling with fear. In the markets there was no rice for sale. The Japanese ruler went in person to visit the Hachiman Shrine to make supplication. He also had a royal rescript read at the shrine of the Sun Goddess, imploring that the country be saved in exchange for his own life.[57] — History of Yuan Typhoon kamikaze and the end of the invasion Wooden anchor of Mongol invasion Stone anchor of Mongol invasion Illustration by Katsushika Isai(1821–1880) On 15 August, a great typhoon, known in Japanese as kamikaze, struck the fleet at anchor from the west and devastated it. Sensing the oncoming typhoon, Korean and south Chinese mariners retreated and unsuccessfully docked in Imari Bay, where they were destroyed by the storm.[58] Thousands of soldiers were left drifting on pieces of wood or washed ashore. The Japanese defenders killed all those they found except for the southern Chinese, who they felt had been coerced into joining the attack on Japan. Now it happened one day that such a gale was blowing from the north that the troops declared that, if they did not get away, all their ships would be wrecked. So they all embarked and left the island and put out to sea. And let me tell you that when they had sailed about four miles, the gale began to freshen and there was such a crowd of ships that many of them were smashed by colliding with one another.[57] — Marco Polo According to a Chinese survivor, after the typhoon Commander Fan Wenhu picked the best remaining ships and sailed away, leaving more than 100,000 troops to die. After being stranded for three days on Taka island, the Japanese attacked and captured tens of thousands. They were moved to Hakata where the Japanese killed all the Mongols, Koreans, and Northern Chinese. The Southern Chinese were spared but made slaves. According to a Korean source, of the 26,989 Koreans who set out with the Eastern Route fleet, 7,592 did not return.[6] Chinese and Mongol sources indicate a casualty rate of 60 to 90 percent.[59] Size of the invasion Many modern historians believe the figures for the invasion force to be exaggerated, as was common in post-classical chronicles. Thomas Conlan, from Princeton University, writes that they were likely exaggerated by an order of magnitude, implying 140,000 soldiers and sailors, and he expresses skepticism that a medieval-era kingdom could have managed an invasion on the scale of D-Day during World War II, across over ten times the distance, and questions if even 10,000 soldiers attacked Japan in 1281.[32] Morris Rossabi writes that Conlan is correct in his assertion that the invasion force was much smaller than traditionally believed but argues that the expenditures lavished on the mission confirm that the fighting force was sizable and much larger than 10,000 soldiers and 4,000 sailors. He puts forward the alternative figure of 70,000 soldiers and sailors, half of what is stated in the Yuanshi and later Japanese claims.[60] Turnbull believes that more than 140,000 is an exaggeration but does not offer his own estimate for the size of the army. Rather, he states that given the contributions of the Southern Song, the second invasion should have been around three times larger than the first. As he earlier listed the common figure of 23,000 for the first invasion uncritically—unlike the estimate of more than 140,000 for the second which would imply an invasion force of around 70,000, on par with Rossabbi's estimate.[61] Aftermath Shōni Kagesuke and his forces in Akasaka The defeated Mongol Empire lost most of its naval power, and its naval defense capability declined significantly.[62] Korea, which was in charge of shipbuilding for the invasion, also lost its ability to build ships and its ability to defend the sea since a large amount of lumber was cut down.[63] On the other hand, in Japan there was no newly acquired land because it was a defensive war, and so the Kamakura shogunate could not give rewards to gokenin who participated in the battle, and its authority declined.[64] Later, taking advantage of the situation, the number of Japanese joining the wokou began to increase, and attacks on the coasts of China and Korea intensified.[62] As a result of the war, there was a growing recognition in China that the Japanese were brave and violent and that invasion of Japan was futile. During the Ming dynasty, invasion into Japan was discussed three times but was never carried out considering the result of this war.[65][66][67] Cultural influence See also: Mongol invasions of Vietnam and Mongol invasion of Java The Zen Buddhism of Hōjō Tokimune and his Zen master Bukkō gained credibility beyond national boundaries, and the first mass followings of Zen teachings among samurai began to flourish. The failed invasions also mark the first use of the word kamikaze ("divine wind"). The fact that the typhoon that helped Japan defeat the Mongol navy in the first invasion occurred in late November, well after the normal Pacific typhoon season (May to October), perpetuated the Japanese belief that they would never be defeated or successfully invaded, which remained an important aspect of Japanese foreign policy until the very end of World War II. The failed invasions also demonstrated one of the Mongols' weaknesses: the inability to mount naval invasions successfully.[68] Military significance Bombs and cannons Stoneware bombs, known in Japanese as tetsuhō (iron bomb), or in Chinese as zhentianlei (literally, heaven-shaking thunder), excavated from Takashima shipwreck, October 2011. The Mongol invasions are an early example of gunpowder warfare outside of China. One of the most notable technological innovations during the war was the use of explosive bombs.[7] The bombs are known in Chinese as "thunder crash bombs" and were fired from catapults, inflicting damage on enemy soldiers. An illustration of a bomb is depicted in the Japanese Mongol Invasion scrolls, but Thomas Conlan has shown that the illustration of the projectiles was added to the scrolls in the 18th century and should not be considered to be an eyewitness representation of their use.[69] However, archaeological discoveries since Conlan's statement have confirmed the existence of bombs in the Yuan invasion's arsenal. Multiple bomb shells were discovered in an underwater shipwreck off the shore of Japan by the Kyushu Okinawa Society for Underwater Archaeology. X-rays by Japanese scientists of the excavated shells show that they contained gunpowder and were also packed with scrap iron.[70][71] The Yuan forces may have also used cannons during the invasion. The Nihon Kokujokushi, written around 1300, mentions huo tong (fire tubes) at the Battle of Tsushima in 1274 and the second coastal assault led by Holdon in 1281. The Hachiman Gudoukun of 1360 mentions iron pao "which caused a flash of light and a loud noise when fired."[72] The Taiheiki mentions a weapon shaped like a bell that made a noise like thunder-clap and shot out thousands of iron balls.[72][73] Takezaki Suenaga and escaping Mongolians Japanese sword The yumi (longbow) and naginata were the main weapons of samurai in this period. Yumi is able to shoot while riding on horseback with the Japanese sword acting as a secondary weapon. As a result of the war, intellectuals of the Mongol Empire regarded Japanese swords as a threat. For example, Wang Yun, who served Kublai, and Zheng Si-xiao, a surviving retainer of the Song Dynasty, mentioned in their book that "Japanese swords are long and extremely sharp." They argued that the combination of a violent samurai and a Japanese sword was a threat.[74][75] The Mongol invasions facilitated a change in the designs of Japanese swords. The swordsmiths of the Sōshū school represented by Masamune studied tachi that were broken or bent in battle, developed new production methods, and created innovative tachi. They forged the blade using a combination of soft and hard steel to optimize the temperature and timing of the heating and cooling of the blade, resulting in a lighter but more robust blade. They made the curve of the blade more gentle, lengthened the tip linearly, widened the width from the cutting edge to the opposite side of the blade, and thinned the cross section to improve the penetration and cutting ability of the blade.[76][77] A typical Ko-Hōki (old Hōki) school tachi. Dōjigiri, by Yasutsuna. 12th century, Heian period, National Treasure, Tokyo National Museum. This sword is one of the Five Swords Under Heaven. (天下五剣 Tenka Goken) A typical Ko-Hōki (old Hōki) school tachi. Dōjigiri, by Yasutsuna. 12th century, Heian period, National Treasure, Tokyo National Museum. This sword is one of the Five Swords Under Heaven. (天下五剣 Tenka Goken) A Sōshū school katana. It was originally a tachi forged by Masamune in the 14th century, but later it was cut from the root and converted into a katana. As it was owned by Ishida Mitsunari, it was commonly called Ishida Masamune. Important Cultural Property, Tokyo National Museum. A Sōshū school katana. It was originally a tachi forged by Masamune in the 14th century, but later it was cut from the root and converted into a katana. As it was owned by Ishida Mitsunari, it was commonly called Ishida Masamune. Important Cultural Property, Tokyo National Museum. Gallery Japanese attack ships Japanese attack ships Mongol soldiers, second version Mongol soldiers, second version Mongol ships, second version Mongol ships, second version Japanese armour ō-yoroi, National Treasure, Kasuga grand shrine Japanese armour ō-yoroi, National Treasure, Kasuga grand shrine Mongol brigandine armour Mongol brigandine armour Mongol helmet Mongol helmet See also Mongol invasion of Java Genkō Bōrui Goryeo under Mongol rule Battles of Khalkin Gol—failed Japanese attempt to invade Mongolia in 1939. Mongol invasions of Sakhalin Mongolians in Japan Battle of Baekgang—battle between Baekje and Yamato Japan, against Silla and Tang China. Japan–Mongolia relations References Footnotes Original text in Chinese: 上天眷命大蒙古國皇帝奉書日本國王朕惟自古小國之君境土相接尚務講信修睦況我祖宗受天明命奄有區夏遐方異域畏威懷德者不可悉數朕即位之初以高麗無辜之民久瘁鋒鏑即令罷兵還其疆域反其旄倪高麗君臣感戴來朝義雖君臣歡若父子計王之君臣亦已知之高麗朕之東藩也日本密邇高麗開國以來亦時通中國至於朕躬而無一乘之使以通和好尚恐王國知之未審故特遣使持書布告朕志冀自今以往通問結好以相親睦且聖人以四海為家不相通好豈一家之理哉以至用兵夫孰所好王其圖之不宣至元三年八月日 Citations Conlan 2001, pp. 261–263 cites a variety of estimate from various Japanese historians as well as the author's own. Twitchett 1994, pp. 437–442. Turnbull 2010, p. 32. Turnbull 2010, pp. 55–57. Turnbull 2010, pp. 49–50. Turnbull 2010, pp. 69–76. Turnbull, Stephen (19 February 2013). The Mongol Invasions of Japan 1274 and 1281. Osprey Publishing. pp. 41–42. ISBN 978-1-4728-0045-9. Retrieved 16 April 2013. The conquest of Ainu lands: ecology and culture in Japanese expansion, 1590–1800 By Brett L. Walker, p.133 Nakamura, Kazuyuki (2010). "Kita kara no mōko shūrai wo meguru shōmondai" 「北からの蒙古襲来」をめぐる諸問題 [Several questions around "the Mongol attack from the north"]. In Kikuchi, Toshihiko (ed.). Hokutō Ajia no rekishi to bunka 北東アジアの歴史と文化 [A history and cultures of Northeast Asia] (in Japanese). Hokkaido University Press. p. 428. ISBN 9784832967342. 元寇 (in Japanese). Japan Knowledge. Archived from the original on 5 October 2022. Retrieved 29 January 2023. "Joint project celebrating the 50th anniversary of Japan-Mongolia diplomatic relations. Relations between Japan and Mongolia in the 13th century". National Archives of Japan. Archived from the original on 25 August 2022. Retrieved 29 January 2023. Hulbert 1999, p. 344-345. Henthorn 1963, p. 68-69. Hulbert 1999, p. 345-346. Hulbert 1999, p. 346. Turnbull 2010, p. 12-13. Turnbull 2010, p. 14. Turnbull 2010, p. 13. Lo 2012, p. 253. Lo 2012, p. 253-254. Lo 2012, p. 254-2555. Jonathan Clements (7 February 2013). A Brief History of the Samurai. Little, Brown Book Group. p. 93. ISBN 978-1-4721-0772-5. "여몽연합군의 일본 정벌, 실패한 까닭은 [윤명철의 한국, 한국인 재발견]". The Korea Economic Daily. 2020-08-09. "충렬왕 - Chungnyeong of Goryeo". "일본원정". Encyclopedia of Korean Culture. Turnbull 2010, p. 33. Turnbull 2010, p. 34. Delgado 2010, p. 92. Delgado 2010, p. 93. Turnbull 2010, p. 37. Delgado 2010, pp. 93–94. Conlan, p. 264 Delgado 2010, p. 94. Turnbull 2010, p. 49. Needham 1986, p. 178. Turnbull 2010, p. 41. Turnbull 2010, p. 40. Delgado 2010, p. 95. Turnbull 2010, pp. 47–48. Delgado 2010, pp. 95–96. Turnbull 2010, p. 48. Delgado 2010, p. 96. Delgado 2010, p. 97. Turnbull 2010, p. 48-50. 福岡市教育委員会 (1969). "福岡市今津元寇防塁発掘調査概報". Comprehensive Database of Archaeological Site Reports in Japan. Retrieved 2016-09-02. Reed, Edward J. (1881). Japan: its History, Traditions, and Religions, p. 291., p. 291, at Google Books "常立寺". www.kamakura-burabura.com. Archived from the original on 12 August 2017. Retrieved 30 April 2018. Winters, Harold et al. (2001). Battling the Elements, p. 14., p. 14, at Google Books Turnbull 2010, p. 58. Turnbull 2010, p. 59. Turnbull 2010, p. 62. Delgado 2010, p. 105. Delgado 2010, p. 106. Turnbull 2010, p. 69. Delgado 2010, p. 107. Turnbull 2010, p. 70. Turnbull 2010, p. 71. Emanuel, Kerry; Emanuel, Professor Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Program in Atmospheres Oceans and Climate Kerry (1 September 2005). Divine Wind: The History and Science of Hurricanes. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-514941-8. Retrieved 30 April 2018 – via Internet Archive. mongol invasion of japan. Turnbull 2010, p. 75. Rossabi, Morris. "Khubilai Khan: His Life and Times." 1988. Page xiii. Turnbull 2013, p. 57. Wang Yong, 中国史のなかの日本像 Section 2 of Chapter 6. Nousangyoson bunka Kyōkai, 2000, ISBN 9784540001710 Hiroki Ōta, 高麗の艦船用材木事情 元の日本遠征に関連して. pp.2-20. Geirinkai, 1988, NAID 40000975703 Davis, Paul K. (2001). 100 decisive battles: from ancient times to the present, p. 146., p. 146, at Google Books Wang Yong, 中国史のなかの日本像 Section 3 of Chapter 6. Nousangyoson bunka Kyōkai, 2000, ISBN 9784540001710 Michihiro Ishihara 新訂 旧唐書倭国日本伝・ 宋史日本伝・元史日本伝―中国正史日本伝〈2〉, pp.213-216. Iwanani bunko, 1986 ISBN 978-4003340219 Hiroki Ōta, 明朝による日本征討論の顛末-元帝国の遠征失敗から得た教訓 pp.1-24, 政治経済史学478, 2006 NAID 40015220057 "The Mongols in World History | Asia Topics in World History". afe.easia.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2018-04-05. Conlan, Thomas. "Myth, Memory and the Scrolls of the Mongol Invasions of Japan". in Lillehoj, Elizabeth ed. Archaism and Antiquarianism in Korean and Japanese Art (Chicago: Center for the Art of East Asia, University of Chicago and Art Media Resources, 2013), pp. 54-73. Sasaki 2015, p. 69. Delgado, James (February 2003). "Relics of the Kamikaze". Archaeology. 56 (1). Archaeological Institute of America. Archived from the original on 2013-12-29. Needham 1986, p. 295. Purton 2010, p. 109. Michihiro Ishihara 新訂 旧唐書倭国日本伝・ 宋史日本伝・元史日本伝―中国正史日本伝〈2〉, p.213. Iwanani bunko, 1986 ISBN 978-4003340219 Yasuhiro Kawagoe 汎海小録の弘安の役記事について 軍事史学 第11巻第1号, pp.26-34. Kinseisha、1975, NAID 40000814544 "なぜ「正宗」は名刀なのか" [Masamune Sword and Blade Workshop] (PDF). "五箇伝(五ヵ伝、五ヶ伝)" [Nagoya Japanese Sword Museum Touken world]. Sources Wikimedia Commons has media related to Mongol invasions of Japan. Conlan, Thomas (2001). In Little Need of Divine Intervention. Cornell University Press. Delgado, James P. (2010). Khubilai Khan's Lost Fleet: In Search of a Legendary Armada. Lo, Jung-pang (2012), China as a Sea Power 1127-1368 Davis, Paul K. (1999). 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-514366-9. OCLC 0195143663. Henthorn, W. E. (1963). Korea: The Mongol Invasions. Leiden E. J. Brill. Hulbert, HOMER B. (1999). The History of Korea Vol. 1. The Methodist Publishing House. Needham, Joseph (1986). Science & Civilisation in China. Vol. V:7: The Gunpowder Epic. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-30358-3. Purton, Peter (2010). A History of the Late Medieval Siege, 1200–1500. Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-84383-449-6. Reed, Edward J. (1880). Japan: its History, Traditions, and Religions. London: J. Murray. OCLC 1309476. Sansom, George (1958). A History of Japan to 1334. Stanford University Press. Sasaki, Randall J. (2015). The Origins of the Lost Fleet of the Mongol Empire. Satō, Kanzan (1983). The Japanese Sword. Kodansha International. ISBN 9780870115622. Turnbull, Stephen (2003). Genghis Khan and the Mongol Conquests, 1190–1400. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-96862-1. Turnbull, Stephen (2010). The Mongol Invasions of Japan 1274 and 1281. Osprey. Twitchett, Denis (1994). The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 6, Alien Regime and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243319. Winters, Harold A.; Galloway, Gerald E.; Reynolds, William J.; Rhyne, David W. (2001). Battling the Elements: Weather and Terrain in the Conduct of War. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press. ISBN 9780801866487. OCLC 492683854.원나라의 일본 원정(元日戰爭)은 1274년과 1281년의 두 번에 걸쳐 원나라의 쿠빌라이 칸이 시도한 일본에 대한 군사 침공을 말한다. 당시 쿠빌라이 칸은 부마국(駙馬國) 충렬왕에게 출정을 강제로 요구하여 만들어진 원정연합군이 일본을 침략했으나 일본군의 완강한 방어와 도중에 만난 태풍으로 인해 실패하였다. 명칭 한국 및 중국의 사료에는 주로 동정(東征) 내지 정동(征東), 정일본(征日本)으로 언급된다. 한국의 역사학자들은 '원나라의 일본원정(日本遠征)', 중국의 사학자들은 원일전쟁(元日战争)이라 부르고 있다. 일본측에서 해당 사건을 가리켜 부르는 원구(元寇)라는 용어는 흔히 에도 시대에 도쿠가와 미쓰쿠니 등이 편찬한 대일본사에서 처음으로 등장한 이래 18세기 長村鑒의 『몽고구기』(蒙古寇紀)、오미야야마 마사히데(小宮山昌秀)의 『원구시말』(元寇始末)、19세기의 大橋訥庵의 『원구기략』(元寇紀略) 등 한국이나 중국의 왜구에서와 같은 「구」(寇)를 사서가 등장해, 해당 사건을 가리키는 일반적인 용어로 굳어갔다. 사건이 벌어졌던 당대 및 그 시점에서 멀지 않은 가마쿠라 ・ 무로마치 시대의 일본 문헌에서는 모코 슈라이(蒙古襲来), 이조쿠 슈라이(異賊襲来), 모코 갓센(蒙古合戦), 이코쿠 갓센(異国合戦) 등으로 표기되어 등장한다. '이조쿠(異賊)'라는 호칭은 일본 이외의 외래로부터 침입해 온 세력을 가리키는데 쓰였는데 『하치만구도훈』(八幡愚童訓) 등 가마쿠라 시대 후기를 전후한 문헌에서는 도이의 입구(刀伊の入寇)나 진구 황후(神功皇后)에 의한 삼한정벌(三韓征伐) 전설에 대해서도 이 호칭을 사용하였다. 그밖에 「흉도」(凶徒)라는 호칭도 사용되었다. 또한 1274년의 1차 침공을 분에이 캇센(文永合戦)、1281년의 제2차 침공을 고안 캇센(弘安合戦)이라 부르기도 한다. 내용 제 1차 원정 고려가 몽골에 굴복하게 되자 1268년에 쿠빌라이 칸은 고려를 통하여 일본에 사절을 보내 통호의 뜻을 전하고 입공을 촉구하였다. 이에 대해 일본 조정측에서는 답신을 보낼 것을 주장하였으나 싯켄(執權)이었던 호조 도키무네는 이를 거부하고 답신도 보내지 않았다. 몽고의 사절은 그 후에도 사절을 보내 왔으나 막부는 몽고의 요구를 듣지 않았다.[1] 결국 몽골은 고려로 하여금 원정을 준비하도록 압박했고 1274년(충렬왕 1년)11월 제 1차로 일본을 침략하였다. 막대한 비용이 소비되는 일이었지만 고려로서는 반대할 수 없었다. 원나라의 강압으로 꾸려진 원정군은 원나라의 훈둔과 고려의 김방경(金方慶)이 사령관으로 지정되어 9백 척의 함선에 총 4만의 군사를 거느리고 고려를 출발하여 10월 5일에 쓰시마(對馬), 10월 14일에 이키(壹岐)를 습격하고, 규슈의 하카타항에 도착, 히라도(平戶)·다카시마(鷹島)의 마쓰우라(松浦)의 본거지를 전멸시켰으나 전투 내내 태풍으로 인해 지속적인 피해를 입었고[2], 강남군의 지연 도착으로 군사 작전에 큰 차질이 생긴 연유로 하여 다음날 퇴각하였다. 개국을 목표로 1차 군사적 조치를 통한 압박에 목적이 있었다는 것이 일반적 견해이다. 제 2차 원정 제 2차 원정은 1281년(충렬왕 7년)에 행해졌다. 고려를 거쳐 가는 동로군(東路軍)은 함선 900, 병원(兵員) 4만, 강동군(江東軍)은 함선 3,500, 병원 10만이었다. 그러나 이번에도 태풍으로 인하여 실패하고 말았다. 여기에는 물론 해상의 기후에 대한 인식의 결핍에도 원인이 있었지만, 동시에 당시 일본의 정권을 쥐고 있던 가마쿠라 막부의 완강한 저항과 일본 정벌에 전력을 기울일 수 없던 원의 국내 사정에도 원인이 있었다. 3차 정벌 준비 3차 정벌도 준비 했으나 남송에서 반란이 일어나 도중에 계획이 무산되었다. 결과 고려의 기 고려 두 차례에 걸친 원정에 강제 동원된 고려는 막대한 피해를 입었으며, 농민들이 이 새로운 동원으로 입은 참상은 형언키 어려운 것이었다. 목선이나 무기에 동원된 자원도 엄청나서 여몽전쟁에 시달린 고려 백성에게 더욱 큰 부담이 되었으며, 원정 도중 징발된 많은 고려 백성이 원정 도중 만난 태풍으로 인해 사망해서 인적 손실 또한 막대하였다. 무엇보다도, 원나라가 일본정벌을 위해 설치한 정동행중서성은 고려의 내정을 간섭하는 기구로 변하였고, 1356년(공민왕 5) 반원(反元)정책을 추진하면서 폐지하게 될 때까지 고려를 압박하였다. 특히 속관(屬官)으로 존재한 이문소는 고려에 존재했던 부원세력(附元勢力)의 이익을 대변하는 기구로 변했다.[3] 일본의 기 일본 원정군의 공격과 미나모토노 가문 후손 단절로 인해 일본도 민심이 흔들리고 전쟁으로 가마쿠라 막부 정권이 쇠퇴하면서 세력이 분열되어 남북조 시대로 넘어가는 중대한 계기가 되었다. 또한 일본으로서는 최초로 받은 외부세력의 대규모 공격이었다. 각주 연민수 1998 23쪽. "1268년에 쿠빌라이는 고려를 통하여 사절을 보내 통호의 뜻을 전하고 입공을 촉구하였다. 이에 대해 조정측에서는 답신을 보낼 것을 주장하였으나 싯켄(執權)이었던 호죠 토키무네(北条時宗)는 이를 거부하고 답신도 보내지 않았다. 몽고의 사절은 그 후에도 계속해서 사절을 보내 왔으나 막부는 몽고의 요구를 듣지 않았다." 『쿠빌라이칸의 일본 원정과 충렬왕』(이승한, 푸른역사, 2009) 정동행중서성

 Major military efforts were taken by Kublai Khan of the Yuan dynasty in 1274 and 1281 to conquer the Japanese archipelago after the submission of the Korean kingdom of Goryeo to vassaldom. Ultimately a failure, the invasion attempts are of macro-historical importance because they set a limit on Mongol expansion and rank as nation-defining events in the history of Japan. The invasions are referred to in many works of fiction and are the earliest events for which the word kamikaze (神風 "divine wind") is widely used, originating in reference to the two typhoons faced by the Yuan fleets.


The invasions were one of the earliest cases of gunpowder warfare outside of China. One of the most notable technological innovations during the war was the use of explosive, hand-thrown bombs.[7]


Background

See also: Mongol invasions and conquests and Mongol military tactics and organization

After a series of Mongol invasions of Korea between 1231 and 1281, Goryeo signed a treaty in favor of the Mongols and became a vassal state. Kublai was declared Khagan of the Mongol Empire in 1260 (although that was not widely recognized by the Mongols in the west) and established his capital at Khanbaliq (within modern Beijing) in 1264.[citation needed]


Japan was then ruled by the Shikken (shogunate regents) of the Hōjō clan, who had intermarried with and wrested control from Minamoto no Yoriie, shōgun of the Kamakura shogunate, after his death in 1203. The inner circle of the Hōjō clan had become so pre-eminent that they no longer consulted the council of the shogunate (Hyōjō (評定)), the Imperial Court of Kyoto, or their gokenin vassals, and they made their decisions at private meetings in their residences (yoriai (寄合)).[citation needed]


The Mongols also made attempts to subjugate the native peoples of Sakhalin, the Ainu and Nivkh peoples, from 1264 to 1308.[8] However, it is doubtful if Mongol activities in Sakhalin were part of the effort to invade Japan.[9]


Contact


Letter from Kublai Khan of the "Great Mongol State" (大蒙古國) to the "King of Japan" (日本國王), written in Classical Chinese, the lingua franca in East Asia at the time, dated 8th Month, 1266. Now stored in Tōdai-ji, Nara, Japan.

From 1266 to 1273, a diplomatic mission composed of Mongols and Koreans sent envoys to Japan six times to demand submission to the Mongols, but the Japanese ignored their demands.[10][11]


In 1265, a Goryeo citizen told Kublai that the Mongols should bring Japan to vassalage. Kublai agreed and appointed Heuk Chŭk and Eun Hong as envoys to Japan. They were ordered to go to Goryeo and take with them a Goryeo envoy as well. They delivered a message to the Wonjong of Goryeo and two of his officials, Son Kun-bi and Kim Ch'an, were appointed to join them on their journey. On their departure, they were met by a storm and the king sent the Mongol envoys back to the Yuan court. Kublai was unsatisfied with the outcome and sent Heuk Chŭk back ordering Wonjong to forward the Mongol envoy to Japan.[12] Yi Changyong, a Goryeo minister, attempted to dissuade the Mongols from their plans on Japan.[13] Kublai sent a general, U-ya Son-dal, to demand that Yi Changyong and Kim Chun, the two most influential officials of Goryeo, be brought to the Yuan court. Kim killed U-ya Son-dal. This frightened Wonjong, who did not want to offend the Mongols, but he dared not lay a hand on Kim. Having gone unpunished, Kim and his family started showing disrespect towards the king. Wonjong and Im Yŏn, an official who hated Kim, summoned him to court and killed him.[14]


Upon reaching the Japanese capital, the Mongol and Goryeo envoys were treated with disrespect and were not allowed to enter the gates. They lodged at a place called T'ă-jă-bu outside the west gate of the city. They remained there for five months with poor entertainment before being dismissed without receiving an answer. Kublai could not believe that his envoys had been treated with such disrespect and suspected that this was a ruse by Wonjong, so he sent Heuk Chŭk back to Japan, this time accompanied by the Goryeo envoy, Sim Sa-jŭn. The envoys had not returned by 1268 but ultimately left after their letter was rejected by the Japanese.[15][16]


The letter stated:


The Emperor of the Great Mongols, being commissioned by Heaven, hereby respectfully presents a letter to the King of Japan. From time immemorial rulers of small states, the borders of which closely adjoin, have always endeavoured to maintain friendly relations with each other and have manifested mutual respect and trust. On our part, we, from the time of our forefathers, have received the Mandate of Heaven and have ruled the universe. Innumerable people in far-off lands have learned to fear our power and have longed for our virtuous rule. When we first ascended the throne, the innocent and helpless people of Korea had suffered for long from military struggles. We therefore ordered a cessation of hostilities, restored their land, and returned the captive Koreans, young and old.

In gratitude both ruler and people of Korea now present themselves at our court. Although the legal relation between ourselves and the Koreans is that of sovereign and subjects, yet in feeling we are as father and children. We assume that Your Highness and your subjects have known this. Korea is our eastern tributary state. Japan is located near to Korea and since her founding has time and again established relations with the Middle Kingdom. However, since our accession you have not yet sent an envoy to our court; nor have you indicated a desire to establish friendly relations with us. We are afraid this is because Your Kingdom has not yet been well informed of this. Therefore we now send a special envoy bearing our state papers to inform you of our desire. We hope that henceforth you will enter into friendly relations with us, and that both our people and yours will enjoy peace and harmony. Moreover, the sages consider the entire universe one family. Therefore, if we should not establish friendly relations with each other, how could it be in accordance with the doctrine of one family? Who would care to appeal to arms?

I hereby leave the matter to Your Highness’s careful consideration.[17][nb 1]


In early 1269, another mission of 70 Koreans and Mongols arrived on Tsushima demanding an answer from Japan to the khan's letter. The imperial court wished to respond but the Kamakura shogunate overruled them. A letter rejecting the Mongol demands was drafted but never delivered.[18]


In late 1270, a final mission was dispatched by Kublai to Japan. The mission was led by Zhao Liangbi and consisted of 24 scribes. They were almost immediately attacked upon arrival in Japan in 1271. They were refused a visit to the "king of Japan". After delivering their letter and receiving no reply, they went home. Zhao waited for a response until 1273 before returning to China. Zhao advised Kublai against attacking Japan because even though the country lacked wealth, the people were warlike.[17][19]


Japan took seriously the letter brought by the second diplomatic mission to Japan in 1268 as an omen of invasion; Shinto shrines and Buddhist temples were instructed to pray for the repulsion of foreign troops and the central government suspended most of its normal duties to concentrate on fortifying its existing defenses in Kyushu.[10]


First invasion preparations


Two Samurai with a dead Mongol at their feet. The one on the right is possibly Sō Sukekuni, the defending commander at Tsushima. Votive image (ema) at the Komodahama Shrine at Sasuura on Tsushima.

In April 1274, the Yuan instructed Holdon and Hong Dagu to mobilize 15,000 men for the invasion of Japan. The Korean general Kim Panggyong led a force of 30,500 to build ships in the fashion of the Southern Chinese. A man from Shandong named Qi Gongzhi who helped Kublai design ships was ordered to Korea where he spent a few months before being sent to Xiangyang for the invasion of southern China. Three types of ships were constructed: 300 large thousand dan ships, 300 batulu fast boats, and 300 tenders. Hong Dagu was put in charge of the construction of large transports while Chaqu supervised the construction of the batulu fast boats. Goryeo was responsible for providing the labor, material, and cost of the construction, which they protested. The construction was finished on 5 July 1274.[20] The invasion fleet was scheduled to depart in the seventh lunar month of 1274 but was delayed for three months due to the death of Wonjong on 23 July and Holdon and Liu Fuheng's tardiness. They did not arrive until September.[21][2][3]


Kublai planned for the fleet to first attack Tsushima Island and Iki Island before making landfall in Hakata Bay. The Japanese plan of defense was simply to contest them at every point with gokenin. Both Yuan and Japanese sources exaggerate the opposing side's numbers, with the History of Yuan putting the Japanese at 102,000, and the Japanese claiming they were outnumbered at least ten to one. In reality, there are no reliable records of the size of Japanese forces, but estimates put their total numbers at around 4,000 to 6,000. The Yuan invasion force was composed of 15,000 Mongol, Han Chinese, and Jurchen soldiers, 6,000 to 8,000 Korean troops, and 7,000 Korean sailors.[2][3]


A story widely known in Japan is that back in Kamakura, Tokimune was overcome with fear when the invasion finally came and wanting to overcome his cowardice, he asked Mugaku Sogen, his Zen master, also known as Bukkō, for advice. Bukkō replied that he had to sit in meditation to find the source of his cowardice in himself. Tokimune went to Bukkō and said, "Finally there is the greatest happening of my life." Bukkō asked, "How do you plan to face it?" Tokimune screamed, "Katsu!" as if he wanted to scare all the enemies in front of him. Bukkō responded with satisfaction, "It is true that the son of a lion roars as a lion!"[22] Since then, Tokimune was instrumental in spreading Zen and Bushido in Japan among the samurai.


First invasion (1274)

Main article: Battle of Bun'ei


Samurai Mitsui Sukenaga (right) defeating the Mongolian invasion army (left)


The Mongol fleet destroyed in a typhoon, ink and water on paper, by Kikuchi Yōsai, 1847

Invasion of Tsushima

The Yuan invasion forces set off from Hoppo (Chinese: 合浦, now Masan, South Gyeongsang Province, Korea) on 2 November 1274 (Dōngyuè 5 in the Chinese calendar).[23][24][25] Two days later they began landing on Tsushima Island. The principal landing was made at Komoda beach near Sasuura, on the northwestern tip of the southern island of Shimono. Additional landings occurred in the strait between the two islands of Tsushima, as well as at two points on the northern island of Kamino.[26]


The following description of events is based on contemporary Japanese sources, notably the Sō Shi Kafu, a history of the Sō clan of Tsushima.


At Sasuura, the invasion fleet was spotted offshore, allowing the deputy governor (jitodai) Sō Sukekuni to organize a hasty defense. On that day, the shrine to Hachiman caught fire, which would have been an omen of bad luck, but Sukekuni interpreted it as an omen of warning.[26]


With 80 mounted samurai and their retinue, Sukekuni confronted an invasion force of what the Sō Shi Kafu describes as 8,000 warriors embarked on 900 ships.[27] The Mongols landed at 02:00 in the morning on 4 November and ignored the Japanese negotiation attempts, shooting with their archers and forcing them to retreat. The fight was engaged by 04:00.[27] The small garrison force was quickly defeated, but according to the Sō Shi Kafu, one samurai, Sukesada, cut down 25 enemy soldiers in individual combat.[28] The invaders defeated a final Japanese cavalry charge around nightfall.[28][27]


After their victory at Komoda, the Yuan forces burnt down most of the buildings around Sasuura and slaughtered most of the inhabitants. They took the next few days to secure control of Tsushima.[27]


Invasion of Iki Island

The Yuan fleet departed Tsushima on 13 November and attacked Iki Island. Like Sukekuni, Taira no Kagetaka, the governor of Iki, gave a spirited defence with 100 samurai and the local armed populace before falling back to his castle by nightfall. The next morning, Yuan forces had surrounded the castle. Knowing that defeat was inevitable, Kagetaka sent his daughter with a trusted samurai, Sōzaburō, on a secret passage to the shore where a ship was waiting to take them to the mainland. Mongol archers spotted them and fired on the ship; Kagetaka's daughter was killed, but Sōzaburō managed to reach Hakata Bay and report Iki's defeat.[29]


Kagetaka made a final failed sortie with 36 men, 30 of whom died in battle, before committing suicide with his family.[30] According to the Japanese, the Mongols held down the surviving women and stabbed them through their palms with knives, stripped them naked, and tied their corpses to the sides of their ships to demonstrate to other Japanese what their fate would be if they did not surrender.[31]


Landing in Hakata Bay

The Yuan fleet crossed the sea and landed in Hakata Bay on 19 November, a short distance from Dazaifu, the ancient administrative capital of Kyūshū. The following day brought the Battle of Bun'ei (文永の役), also known as the "First Battle of Hakata Bay".


Conlan argues that the History of Yuan's account of the battle suggests that both the Japanese and Yuan forces were of similar size. Conlan estimates that both armies numbered around 3,000 each (not including the Yuan sailors) during this battle[32] while Japanese historians estimate 6,000 defenders on the Japanese side.[33] The Japanese forces, being inexperienced with non-Japanese tactics, found the Mongol army perplexing. The Yuan forces disembarked and advanced in a dense body protected by a screen of shields. They wielded their polearms in a tightly packed fashion with no space between them. As they advanced they also threw paper and iron casing bombs on occasion, frightening the Japanese horses and making them uncontrollable in battle. When the grandson of a Japanese commander shot an arrow to announce the beginning of battle, the Mongols burst out laughing.[34]


The commanding general kept his position on high ground, and directed the various detachments as need be with signals from hand-drums. But whenever the (Mongol) soldiers took to flight, they sent iron bomb-shells (tetsuho) flying against us, which made our side dizzy and confused. Our soldiers were frightened out of their wits by the thundering explosions; their eyes were blinded, their ears deafened, so that they could hardly distinguish east from west. According to our manner of fighting, we must first call out by name someone from the enemy ranks, and then attack in single combat. But they (the Mongols) took no notice at all of such conventions; they rushed forward all together in a mass, grappling with any individuals they could catch and killing them.[35]


— Hachiman Gudōkun

The History of Yuan gives a similar but shorter account:


Occupying the heights, his generals gave command by beating drums and the troops advanced or retreated according to the beat of the drums. When the enemy had moved into the pre-arranged positions, the invaders attacked from all sides. They also used firearms and [thus] slaughtered the enemy forces in countless numbers. Thus the Japanese were put to rout.[36]


— History of Yuan

The battle lasted for only a day, and the fighting, though fierce, was uncoordinated and brief.[37] One low-ranking samurai, Takezaki Suenaga, received word from his commander Shōni Kagesuke that he was to wait until the Mongols advanced due to difficult terrain, but Takezaki attacked the Mongols anyway. On his way to the beach, he encountered Kikuchi Takefusa, who had already encountered a Yuan detachment, driven them away and killed two. Kikuchi told him the "pirates" had already fled. Takezaki and his five companions charged the small Yuan detachment that Kikuchi had previously encountered, but their horses got stuck in the mud, and they were wounded by a barrage of arrows. Takezaki and three surviving retainers managed to retreat with the aid of Shiroishi Michiyasu, who charged the Yuan detachment and drove them away.[38][39] By nightfall the Yuan invasion force had forced the Japanese off the beach with a third of the defending forces dead, driving them several kilometres inland, and burning Hakata.[40]


The Japanese were preparing to make a last stand at Mizuki (water castle), an earthwork moat fort dating back to 664.[41] However the Yuan attack never came. One of the three commanding Yuan generals, Liu Fuxiang (Yu-Puk Hyong), was shot in the face by the retreating samurai, Shōni Kagesuke, and seriously injured. Liu convened with the other generals Holdon and Hong Dagu back on his ship. Holdon wanted to keep advancing through the night before more Japanese reinforcements arrived, but Hong was worried that their troops were too exhausted and needed rest. There was also fear of being ambushed in the night. Liu agreed with Hong and recalled the Yuan forces back to their ships.[42]


Disappearance of the invaders

By morning, most of the Yuan ships had disappeared. According to a Japanese courtier in his diary entry for 6 November 1274, a sudden reverse wind from the east blew back the Yuan fleet. A few ships were beached, and some 50 Yuan soldiers and sailors were captured and executed. According to the History of Yuan, "a great storm arose and many warships were dashed on the rocks and destroyed."[43] It is not certain whether the storm occurred at Hakata or if the fleet had already set sail for Korea and encountered it on their way back. Some accounts offer casualty reports that suggest 200 ships were lost. Of the 30,000 strong invasion force, 13,500 did not return.[44]


Second invasion preparations


A stone defense wall (Genkō Bōrui) at Nishijin, near Seinan University. Currently, only the top of a few stone walls are exposed to the ground, and most of them have been reclaimed.


A stake driven into the mouth of a river to prevent the Mongol army from landing. It was excavated in 1905 (Genkō Museum).

After the invasion of 1274, the shogunate made efforts to defend against a second invasion, which they thought was sure to come. They better organized the samurai of Kyūshū and ordered the construction of forts and a large stone wall (石塁, Sekirui or 防塁, Bōrui) and other defensive structures at many potential landing points, including Hakata Bay, where a two-meter (6.6 ft) high wall was constructed in 1276.[45] In addition, a large number of stakes were driven into the mouth of the river and the expected landing sites to prevent the Mongol army from landing.


Kublai Khan sent five Yuan emissaries in September 1275 to Kyūshū, who refused to leave without a reply. Tokimune responded by having them sent to Kamakura and then beheading them.[46] The graves of those five executed Yuan emissaries still exist at Jōryū-ji, in Fujisawa, Kanagawa, near the Tatsunokuchi Execution Place in Kamakura.[47] Five more Yuan emissaries were sent on 29 July 1279, in the same manner, and were again beheaded, this time in Hakata.


In the autumn of 1280, Kublai held a conference at his summer palaces to discuss plans for a second invasion of Japan. The major difference between the first and the second invasion was that the Yuan dynasty had finished conquering the Song dynasty in 1279 and was able to launch a two-pronged attack. The invading force was drawn from several sources, including criminals with commuted death sentences and even those mourning the loss of their parents—a serious affair in China. More than 1,500 ships were requisitioned for the invasion: 600 from southern China and 900 from Korea. Reportedly 40,000 troops were amassed in Korea and 100,000 in southern China. Those numbers are likely an exaggeration, but the addition of southern Chinese resources probably meant the second invasion force was still several times larger than the first invasion. Nothing is known about the size of the Japanese forces.[4]


Second invasion (1281)

Main article: Battle of Kōan

Attacks on Tsushima and Iki

Orders for the second invasion came in the first lunar month of 1281. Two fleets were prepared, a force of 900 ships in Korea and 3,500 ships in southern China with a combined force of 142,000 soldiers and sailors.[32] The Mongol general Arakhan was named supreme commander of the operation and was to travel with the Southern Route fleet, which was under the command of Fan Wenhu but was delayed by supply difficulties.[48]


The Eastern Route army set sail first from Korea on 22 May and attacked Tsushima on 9 June and Iki Island on 14 June. According to the History of Yuan, the Japanese commander Shōni Suketoki and Ryūzōji Suetoki led forces against the invasion force. The expeditionary forces discharged their firearms, and the Japanese were routed, with Suketoki killed in the process. More than 300 islanders were killed. The Yuan soldiers sought out the children and killed them as well. However, the History of Yuan merges events in June with the later battle in July, when Shōni Suketoki actually fell in battle.[49]


Landings in Nagato and Hakata Bay


Japanese samurai boarding Yuan ships in 1281.


The defensive wall at Hakata

The Eastern Route army was supposed to wait for the Southern Route army at Iki, but their commanders, Hong Dagu and Kim Bang-gyeong, disobeyed orders and set out to invade Mainland Japan by themselves. They departed on 23 June, a full week ahead of the expected arrival of the Southern Route army on 2 July. The Eastern Route army split their forces in half and simultaneously attacked Hakata Bay and Nagato Province. Three hundred ships attacked Nagato on 25 June but were driven off and forced to return to Iki.[49]


Meanwhile, the rest of the Eastern Route army attacked Hakata Bay, which was heavily fortified with a defensive wall. Some Mongol ships came ashore but were unable to make it past the defensive wall and were driven off by volleys of arrows.[50]


Japanese counterattacks and Mongol withdrawal

Unable to land, the Mongol invasion force occupied the islands of Shika and Noko from which it had planned to launch raids against Hakata. Instead, the Japanese launched raids at night on board small ships. The Hachiman Gudōkun credit Kusano Jirō with boarding a Mongol ship, setting fire to it, and taking 21 heads.[51]


The next day, Kawano Michiari led a daytime raid with just two boats. His uncle Michitoki was immediately killed by an arrow, and Michiari was wounded both in the shoulder and the left arm. However, upon boarding the enemy ship, he slew a large Mongol warrior for which he was made a hero and richly rewarded. Takezaki Suenaga was also among those who raided the Yuan fleet.[52] Takezaki also participated in driving the Mongols from Shika island, although in that instance, he was wounded and forced them to withdraw to Iki on 30 June.[53]


The Japanese defence of Hakata Bay is known as the Battle of Kōan. On 16 July, fighting commenced between the Japanese and Mongols at Iki Island, resulting in Mongol withdrawal to Hirado Island.[54]


Stalemate at Hakata

After the Southern Route fleet convened with the Eastern Route fleet, the two fleets took some time rearranging themselves before they advanced on Taka island. After taking Taka island, the Yuan army advanced on Hakata. A two-week battle ensued throughout the countryside that entered a stalemate.[55]


On 12 August, the Japanese repeated their small raids on the invasion fleet that lasted throughout the night. The Mongols responded by fastening their ships together with chains and planks to provide defensive platforms. There are no accounts of the raids from the Japanese side in this incident unlike at the defence of Hakata Bay. According to the History of Yuan, the Japanese ships were small and were all beaten off:[55][56]


Japanese war craft, being small in size, were no match [for these ships]. Those which came up to attack were all beaten off. The whole country therefore was trembling with fear. In the markets there was no rice for sale. The Japanese ruler went in person to visit the Hachiman Shrine to make supplication. He also had a royal rescript read at the shrine of the Sun Goddess, imploring that the country be saved in exchange for his own life.[57]


— History of Yuan

Typhoon kamikaze and the end of the invasion


Wooden anchor of Mongol invasion


Stone anchor of Mongol invasion


Illustration by Katsushika Isai(1821–1880)

On 15 August, a great typhoon, known in Japanese as kamikaze, struck the fleet at anchor from the west and devastated it. Sensing the oncoming typhoon, Korean and south Chinese mariners retreated and unsuccessfully docked in Imari Bay, where they were destroyed by the storm.[58] Thousands of soldiers were left drifting on pieces of wood or washed ashore. The Japanese defenders killed all those they found except for the southern Chinese, who they felt had been coerced into joining the attack on Japan.


Now it happened one day that such a gale was blowing from the north that the troops declared that, if they did not get away, all their ships would be wrecked. So they all embarked and left the island and put out to sea. And let me tell you that when they had sailed about four miles, the gale began to freshen and there was such a crowd of ships that many of them were smashed by colliding with one another.[57]


— Marco Polo

According to a Chinese survivor, after the typhoon Commander Fan Wenhu picked the best remaining ships and sailed away, leaving more than 100,000 troops to die. After being stranded for three days on Taka island, the Japanese attacked and captured tens of thousands. They were moved to Hakata where the Japanese killed all the Mongols, Koreans, and Northern Chinese. The Southern Chinese were spared but made slaves. According to a Korean source, of the 26,989 Koreans who set out with the Eastern Route fleet, 7,592 did not return.[6] Chinese and Mongol sources indicate a casualty rate of 60 to 90 percent.[59]


Size of the invasion

Many modern historians believe the figures for the invasion force to be exaggerated, as was common in post-classical chronicles. Thomas Conlan, from Princeton University, writes that they were likely exaggerated by an order of magnitude, implying 140,000 soldiers and sailors, and he expresses skepticism that a medieval-era kingdom could have managed an invasion on the scale of D-Day during World War II, across over ten times the distance, and questions if even 10,000 soldiers attacked Japan in 1281.[32]


Morris Rossabi writes that Conlan is correct in his assertion that the invasion force was much smaller than traditionally believed but argues that the expenditures lavished on the mission confirm that the fighting force was sizable and much larger than 10,000 soldiers and 4,000 sailors. He puts forward the alternative figure of 70,000 soldiers and sailors, half of what is stated in the Yuanshi and later Japanese claims.[60]


Turnbull believes that more than 140,000 is an exaggeration but does not offer his own estimate for the size of the army. Rather, he states that given the contributions of the Southern Song, the second invasion should have been around three times larger than the first. As he earlier listed the common figure of 23,000 for the first invasion uncritically—unlike the estimate of more than 140,000 for the second which would imply an invasion force of around 70,000, on par with Rossabbi's estimate.[61]


Aftermath


Shōni Kagesuke and his forces in Akasaka

The defeated Mongol Empire lost most of its naval power, and its naval defense capability declined significantly.[62] Korea, which was in charge of shipbuilding for the invasion, also lost its ability to build ships and its ability to defend the sea since a large amount of lumber was cut down.[63] On the other hand, in Japan there was no newly acquired land because it was a defensive war, and so the Kamakura shogunate could not give rewards to gokenin who participated in the battle, and its authority declined.[64] Later, taking advantage of the situation, the number of Japanese joining the wokou began to increase, and attacks on the coasts of China and Korea intensified.[62]


As a result of the war, there was a growing recognition in China that the Japanese were brave and violent and that invasion of Japan was futile. During the Ming dynasty, invasion into Japan was discussed three times but was never carried out considering the result of this war.[65][66][67]


Cultural influence

See also: Mongol invasions of Vietnam and Mongol invasion of Java

The Zen Buddhism of Hōjō Tokimune and his Zen master Bukkō gained credibility beyond national boundaries, and the first mass followings of Zen teachings among samurai began to flourish. The failed invasions also mark the first use of the word kamikaze ("divine wind"). The fact that the typhoon that helped Japan defeat the Mongol navy in the first invasion occurred in late November, well after the normal Pacific typhoon season (May to October), perpetuated the Japanese belief that they would never be defeated or successfully invaded, which remained an important aspect of Japanese foreign policy until the very end of World War II. The failed invasions also demonstrated one of the Mongols' weaknesses: the inability to mount naval invasions successfully.[68]


Military significance

Bombs and cannons


Stoneware bombs, known in Japanese as tetsuhō (iron bomb), or in Chinese as zhentianlei (literally, heaven-shaking thunder), excavated from Takashima shipwreck, October 2011.

The Mongol invasions are an early example of gunpowder warfare outside of China. One of the most notable technological innovations during the war was the use of explosive bombs.[7] The bombs are known in Chinese as "thunder crash bombs" and were fired from catapults, inflicting damage on enemy soldiers. An illustration of a bomb is depicted in the Japanese Mongol Invasion scrolls, but Thomas Conlan has shown that the illustration of the projectiles was added to the scrolls in the 18th century and should not be considered to be an eyewitness representation of their use.[69] However, archaeological discoveries since Conlan's statement have confirmed the existence of bombs in the Yuan invasion's arsenal. Multiple bomb shells were discovered in an underwater shipwreck off the shore of Japan by the Kyushu Okinawa Society for Underwater Archaeology. X-rays by Japanese scientists of the excavated shells show that they contained gunpowder and were also packed with scrap iron.[70][71]


The Yuan forces may have also used cannons during the invasion. The Nihon Kokujokushi, written around 1300, mentions huo tong (fire tubes) at the Battle of Tsushima in 1274 and the second coastal assault led by Holdon in 1281. The Hachiman Gudoukun of 1360 mentions iron pao "which caused a flash of light and a loud noise when fired."[72] The Taiheiki mentions a weapon shaped like a bell that made a noise like thunder-clap and shot out thousands of iron balls.[72][73]



Takezaki Suenaga and escaping Mongolians

Japanese sword

The yumi (longbow) and naginata were the main weapons of samurai in this period. Yumi is able to shoot while riding on horseback with the Japanese sword acting as a secondary weapon. As a result of the war, intellectuals of the Mongol Empire regarded Japanese swords as a threat. For example, Wang Yun, who served Kublai, and Zheng Si-xiao, a surviving retainer of the Song Dynasty, mentioned in their book that "Japanese swords are long and extremely sharp." They argued that the combination of a violent samurai and a Japanese sword was a threat.[74][75]


The Mongol invasions facilitated a change in the designs of Japanese swords. The swordsmiths of the Sōshū school represented by Masamune studied tachi that were broken or bent in battle, developed new production methods, and created innovative tachi. They forged the blade using a combination of soft and hard steel to optimize the temperature and timing of the heating and cooling of the blade, resulting in a lighter but more robust blade. They made the curve of the blade more gentle, lengthened the tip linearly, widened the width from the cutting edge to the opposite side of the blade, and thinned the cross section to improve the penetration and cutting ability of the blade.[76][77]


A typical Ko-Hōki (old Hōki) school tachi. Dōjigiri, by Yasutsuna. 12th century, Heian period, National Treasure, Tokyo National Museum. This sword is one of the Five Swords Under Heaven. (天下五剣 Tenka Goken)

A typical Ko-Hōki (old Hōki) school tachi. Dōjigiri, by Yasutsuna. 12th century, Heian period, National Treasure, Tokyo National Museum. This sword is one of the Five Swords Under Heaven. (天下五剣 Tenka Goken)

 

A Sōshū school katana. It was originally a tachi forged by Masamune in the 14th century, but later it was cut from the root and converted into a katana. As it was owned by Ishida Mitsunari, it was commonly called Ishida Masamune. Important Cultural Property, Tokyo National Museum.

A Sōshū school katana. It was originally a tachi forged by Masamune in the 14th century, but later it was cut from the root and converted into a katana. As it was owned by Ishida Mitsunari, it was commonly called Ishida Masamune. Important Cultural Property, Tokyo National Museum.

Gallery

Japanese attack ships

Japanese attack ships

 

Mongol soldiers, second version

Mongol soldiers, second version

 

Mongol ships, second version

Mongol ships, second version

 

Japanese armour ō-yoroi, National Treasure, Kasuga grand shrine

Japanese armour ō-yoroi, National Treasure, Kasuga grand shrine

 

Mongol brigandine armour

Mongol brigandine armour

 

Mongol helmet

Mongol helmet

See also

Mongol invasion of Java

Genkō Bōrui

Goryeo under Mongol rule

Battles of Khalkin Gol—failed Japanese attempt to invade Mongolia in 1939.

Mongol invasions of Sakhalin

Mongolians in Japan

Battle of Baekgang—battle between Baekje and Yamato Japan, against Silla and Tang China.

Japan–Mongolia relations

References

Footnotes

 Original text in Chinese: 上天眷命大蒙古國皇帝奉書日本國王朕惟自古小國之君境土相接尚務講信修睦況我祖宗受天明命奄有區夏遐方異域畏威懷德者不可悉數朕即位之初以高麗無辜之民久瘁鋒鏑即令罷兵還其疆域反其旄倪高麗君臣感戴來朝義雖君臣歡若父子計王之君臣亦已知之高麗朕之東藩也日本密邇高麗開國以來亦時通中國至於朕躬而無一乘之使以通和好尚恐王國知之未審故特遣使持書布告朕志冀自今以往通問結好以相親睦且聖人以四海為家不相通好豈一家之理哉以至用兵夫孰所好王其圖之不宣至元三年八月日

Citations

 Conlan 2001, pp. 261–263 cites a variety of estimate from various Japanese historians as well as the author's own.

 Twitchett 1994, pp. 437–442.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 32.

 Turnbull 2010, pp. 55–57.

 Turnbull 2010, pp. 49–50.

 Turnbull 2010, pp. 69–76.

 Turnbull, Stephen (19 February 2013). The Mongol Invasions of Japan 1274 and 1281. Osprey Publishing. pp. 41–42. ISBN 978-1-4728-0045-9. Retrieved 16 April 2013.

 The conquest of Ainu lands: ecology and culture in Japanese expansion, 1590–1800 By Brett L. Walker, p.133

 Nakamura, Kazuyuki (2010). "Kita kara no mōko shūrai wo meguru shōmondai" 「北からの蒙古襲来」をめぐる諸問題 [Several questions around "the Mongol attack from the north"]. In Kikuchi, Toshihiko (ed.). Hokutō Ajia no rekishi to bunka 北東アジアの歴史と文化 [A history and cultures of Northeast Asia] (in Japanese). Hokkaido University Press. p. 428. ISBN 9784832967342.

 元寇 (in Japanese). Japan Knowledge. Archived from the original on 5 October 2022. Retrieved 29 January 2023.

 "Joint project celebrating the 50th anniversary of Japan-Mongolia diplomatic relations. Relations between Japan and Mongolia in the 13th century". National Archives of Japan. Archived from the original on 25 August 2022. Retrieved 29 January 2023.

 Hulbert 1999, p. 344-345.

 Henthorn 1963, p. 68-69.

 Hulbert 1999, p. 345-346.

 Hulbert 1999, p. 346.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 12-13.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 14.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 13.

 Lo 2012, p. 253.

 Lo 2012, p. 253-254.

 Lo 2012, p. 254-2555.

 Jonathan Clements (7 February 2013). A Brief History of the Samurai. Little, Brown Book Group. p. 93. ISBN 978-1-4721-0772-5.

 "여몽연합군의 일본 정벌, 실패한 까닭은 [윤명철의 한국, 한국인 재발견]". The Korea Economic Daily. 2020-08-09.

 "충렬왕 - Chungnyeong of Goryeo".

 "일본원정". Encyclopedia of Korean Culture.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 33.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 34.

 Delgado 2010, p. 92.

 Delgado 2010, p. 93.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 37.

 Delgado 2010, pp. 93–94.

 Conlan, p. 264

 Delgado 2010, p. 94.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 49.

 Needham 1986, p. 178.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 41.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 40.

 Delgado 2010, p. 95.

 Turnbull 2010, pp. 47–48.

 Delgado 2010, pp. 95–96.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 48.

 Delgado 2010, p. 96.

 Delgado 2010, p. 97.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 48-50.

 福岡市教育委員会 (1969). "福岡市今津元寇防塁発掘調査概報". Comprehensive Database of Archaeological Site Reports in Japan. Retrieved 2016-09-02.

 Reed, Edward J. (1881). Japan: its History, Traditions, and Religions, p. 291., p. 291, at Google Books

 "常立寺". www.kamakura-burabura.com. Archived from the original on 12 August 2017. Retrieved 30 April 2018.

 Winters, Harold et al. (2001). Battling the Elements, p. 14., p. 14, at Google Books

 Turnbull 2010, p. 58.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 59.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 62.

 Delgado 2010, p. 105.

 Delgado 2010, p. 106.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 69.

 Delgado 2010, p. 107.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 70.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 71.

 Emanuel, Kerry; Emanuel, Professor Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Program in Atmospheres Oceans and Climate Kerry (1 September 2005). Divine Wind: The History and Science of Hurricanes. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-514941-8. Retrieved 30 April 2018 – via Internet Archive. mongol invasion of japan.

 Turnbull 2010, p. 75.

 Rossabi, Morris. "Khubilai Khan: His Life and Times." 1988. Page xiii.

 Turnbull 2013, p. 57.

 Wang Yong, 中国史のなかの日本像 Section 2 of Chapter 6. Nousangyoson bunka Kyōkai, 2000, ISBN 9784540001710

 Hiroki Ōta, 高麗の艦船用材木事情 元の日本遠征に関連して. pp.2-20. Geirinkai, 1988, NAID 40000975703

 Davis, Paul K. (2001). 100 decisive battles: from ancient times to the present, p. 146., p. 146, at Google Books

 Wang Yong, 中国史のなかの日本像 Section 3 of Chapter 6. Nousangyoson bunka Kyōkai, 2000, ISBN 9784540001710

 Michihiro Ishihara 新訂 旧唐書倭国日本伝・ 宋史日本伝・元史日本伝―中国正史日本伝〈2〉, pp.213-216. Iwanani bunko, 1986 ISBN 978-4003340219

 Hiroki Ōta, 明朝による日本征討論の顛末-元帝国の遠征失敗から得た教訓 pp.1-24, 政治経済史学478, 2006 NAID 40015220057

 "The Mongols in World History | Asia Topics in World History". afe.easia.columbia.edu. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2018-04-05.

 Conlan, Thomas. "Myth, Memory and the Scrolls of the Mongol Invasions of Japan". in Lillehoj, Elizabeth ed. Archaism and Antiquarianism in Korean and Japanese Art (Chicago: Center for the Art of East Asia, University of Chicago and Art Media Resources, 2013), pp. 54-73.

 Sasaki 2015, p. 69.

 Delgado, James (February 2003). "Relics of the Kamikaze". Archaeology. 56 (1). Archaeological Institute of America. Archived from the original on 2013-12-29.

 Needham 1986, p. 295.

 Purton 2010, p. 109.

 Michihiro Ishihara 新訂 旧唐書倭国日本伝・ 宋史日本伝・元史日本伝―中国正史日本伝〈2〉, p.213. Iwanani bunko, 1986 ISBN 978-4003340219

 Yasuhiro Kawagoe 汎海小録の弘安の役記事について 軍事史学 第11巻第1号, pp.26-34. Kinseisha、1975, NAID 40000814544

 "なぜ「正宗」は名刀なのか" [Masamune Sword and Blade Workshop] (PDF).

 "五箇伝(五ヵ伝、五ヶ伝)" [Nagoya Japanese Sword Museum Touken world].

Sources


Wikimedia Commons has media related to Mongol invasions of Japan.

Conlan, Thomas (2001). In Little Need of Divine Intervention. Cornell University Press.

Delgado, James P. (2010). Khubilai Khan's Lost Fleet: In Search of a Legendary Armada.

Lo, Jung-pang (2012), China as a Sea Power 1127-1368

Davis, Paul K. (1999). 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-514366-9. OCLC 0195143663.

Henthorn, W. E. (1963). Korea: The Mongol Invasions. Leiden E. J. Brill.

Hulbert, HOMER B. (1999). The History of Korea Vol. 1. The Methodist Publishing House.

Needham, Joseph (1986). Science & Civilisation in China. Vol. V:7: The Gunpowder Epic. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-30358-3.

Purton, Peter (2010). A History of the Late Medieval Siege, 1200–1500. Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-84383-449-6.

Reed, Edward J. (1880). Japan: its History, Traditions, and Religions. London: J. Murray. OCLC 1309476.

Sansom, George (1958). A History of Japan to 1334. Stanford University Press.

Sasaki, Randall J. (2015). The Origins of the Lost Fleet of the Mongol Empire.

Satō, Kanzan (1983). The Japanese Sword. Kodansha International. ISBN 9780870115622.

Turnbull, Stephen (2003). Genghis Khan and the Mongol Conquests, 1190–1400. London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-415-96862-1.

Turnbull, Stephen (2010). The Mongol Invasions of Japan 1274 and 1281. Osprey.

Twitchett, Denis (1994). The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 6, Alien Regime and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243319.

Winters, Harold A.; Galloway, Gerald E.; Reynolds, William J.; Rhyne, David W. (2001). Battling the Elements: Weather and Terrain in the Conduct of War. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press. ISBN 9780801866487. OCLC 492683854.원나라의 일본 원정(元日戰爭)은 1274년과 1281년의 두 번에 걸쳐 원나라의 쿠빌라이 칸이 시도한 일본에 대한 군사 침공을 말한다. 당시 쿠빌라이 칸은 부마국(駙馬國) 충렬왕에게 출정을 강제로 요구하여 만들어진 원정연합군이 일본을 침략했으나 일본군의 완강한 방어와 도중에 만난 태풍으로 인해 실패하였다.


명칭

한국 및 중국의 사료에는 주로 동정(東征) 내지 정동(征東), 정일본(征日本)으로 언급된다. 한국의 역사학자들은 '원나라의 일본원정(日本遠征)', 중국의 사학자들은 원일전쟁(元日战争)이라 부르고 있다.


일본측에서 해당 사건을 가리켜 부르는 원구(元寇)라는 용어는 흔히 에도 시대에 도쿠가와 미쓰쿠니 등이 편찬한 대일본사에서 처음으로 등장한 이래 18세기 長村鑒의 『몽고구기』(蒙古寇紀)、오미야야마 마사히데(小宮山昌秀)의 『원구시말』(元寇始末)、19세기의 大橋訥庵의 『원구기략』(元寇紀略) 등 한국이나 중국의 왜구에서와 같은 「구」(寇)를 사서가 등장해, 해당 사건을 가리키는 일반적인 용어로 굳어갔다. 사건이 벌어졌던 당대 및 그 시점에서 멀지 않은 가마쿠라 ・ 무로마치 시대의 일본 문헌에서는 모코 슈라이(蒙古襲来), 이조쿠 슈라이(異賊襲来), 모코 갓센(蒙古合戦), 이코쿠 갓센(異国合戦) 등으로 표기되어 등장한다. '이조쿠(異賊)'라는 호칭은 일본 이외의 외래로부터 침입해 온 세력을 가리키는데 쓰였는데 『하치만구도훈』(八幡愚童訓) 등 가마쿠라 시대 후기를 전후한 문헌에서는 도이의 입구(刀伊の入寇)나 진구 황후(神功皇后)에 의한 삼한정벌(三韓征伐) 전설에 대해서도 이 호칭을 사용하였다. 그밖에 「흉도」(凶徒)라는 호칭도 사용되었다. 또한 1274년의 1차 침공을 분에이 캇센(文永合戦)、1281년의 제2차 침공을 고안 캇센(弘安合戦)이라 부르기도 한다.


내용

제 1차 원정

고려가 몽골에 굴복하게 되자 1268년에 쿠빌라이 칸은 고려를 통하여 일본에 사절을 보내 통호의 뜻을 전하고 입공을 촉구하였다. 이에 대해 일본 조정측에서는 답신을 보낼 것을 주장하였으나 싯켄(執權)이었던 호조 도키무네는 이를 거부하고 답신도 보내지 않았다. 몽고의 사절은 그 후에도 사절을 보내 왔으나 막부는 몽고의 요구를 듣지 않았다.[1]


결국 몽골은 고려로 하여금 원정을 준비하도록 압박했고 1274년(충렬왕 1년)11월 제 1차로 일본을 침략하였다. 막대한 비용이 소비되는 일이었지만 고려로서는 반대할 수 없었다. 원나라의 강압으로 꾸려진 원정군은 원나라의 훈둔과 고려의 김방경(金方慶)이 사령관으로 지정되어 9백 척의 함선에 총 4만의 군사를 거느리고 고려를 출발하여 10월 5일에 쓰시마(對馬), 10월 14일에 이키(壹岐)를 습격하고, 규슈의 하카타항에 도착, 히라도(平戶)·다카시마(鷹島)의 마쓰우라(松浦)의 본거지를 전멸시켰으나 전투 내내 태풍으로 인해 지속적인 피해를 입었고[2], 강남군의 지연 도착으로 군사 작전에 큰 차질이 생긴 연유로 하여 다음날 퇴각하였다. 개국을 목표로 1차 군사적 조치를 통한 압박에 목적이 있었다는 것이 일반적 견해이다.


제 2차 원정

제 2차 원정은 1281년(충렬왕 7년)에 행해졌다. 고려를 거쳐 가는 동로군(東路軍)은 함선 900, 병원(兵員) 4만, 강동군(江東軍)은 함선 3,500, 병원 10만이었다.


그러나 이번에도 태풍으로 인하여 실패하고 말았다. 여기에는 물론 해상의 기후에 대한 인식의 결핍에도 원인이 있었지만, 동시에 당시 일본의 정권을 쥐고 있던 가마쿠라 막부의 완강한 저항과 일본 정벌에 전력을 기울일 수 없던 원의 국내 사정에도 원인이 있었다.


3차 정벌 준비

3차 정벌도 준비 했으나 남송에서 반란이 일어나 도중에 계획이 무산되었다.


결과

고려의 기 고려

두 차례에 걸친 원정에 강제 동원된 고려는 막대한 피해를 입었으며, 농민들이 이 새로운 동원으로 입은 참상은 형언키 어려운 것이었다. 목선이나 무기에 동원된 자원도 엄청나서 여몽전쟁에 시달린 고려 백성에게 더욱 큰 부담이 되었으며, 원정 도중 징발된 많은 고려 백성이 원정 도중 만난 태풍으로 인해 사망해서 인적 손실 또한 막대하였다. 무엇보다도, 원나라가 일본정벌을 위해 설치한 정동행중서성은 고려의 내정을 간섭하는 기구로 변하였고, 1356년(공민왕 5) 반원(反元)정책을 추진하면서 폐지하게 될 때까지 고려를 압박하였다. 특히 속관(屬官)으로 존재한 이문소는 고려에 존재했던 부원세력(附元勢力)의 이익을 대변하는 기구로 변했다.[3]


일본의 기 일본

원정군의 공격과 미나모토노 가문 후손 단절로 인해 일본도 민심이 흔들리고 전쟁으로 가마쿠라 막부 정권이 쇠퇴하면서 세력이 분열되어 남북조 시대로 넘어가는 중대한 계기가 되었다. 또한 일본으로서는 최초로 받은 외부세력의 대규모 공격이었다.


각주

 연민수 1998 23쪽. "1268년에 쿠빌라이는 고려를 통하여 사절을 보내 통호의 뜻을 전하고 입공을 촉구하였다. 이에 대해 조정측에서는 답신을 보낼 것을 주장하였으나 싯켄(執權)이었던 호죠 토키무네(北条時宗)는 이를 거부하고 답신도 보내지 않았다. 몽고의 사절은 그 후에도 계속해서 사절을 보내 왔으나 막부는 몽고의 요구를 듣지 않았다."

 『쿠빌라이칸의 일본 원정과 충렬왕』(이승한, 푸른역사, 2009)

 정동행중서성












































댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

프리드리히 2세(독일어: Friedrich II, 1712년 1월 24일 ~ 1786년 8월 17일)는 독일 프로이센 왕국의 제3대 프로이센 국왕이다(재위 : 1740년 5월 31일 - 1786년 8월 17일). 종교에 대한 관용 정책을 펼치고 재판과정에서 고문을 근절한 계몽군주였다.국가를 통치하고 인재를 기용하는 것과 군대 조직과 군대의 지휘, 정복전쟁 지휘를 직접 담당하는 등의 역할을 모두 빈틈없이 해결했다. 뛰어난 군사적 재능과 합리적인 국가경영을 발휘해 프로이센을 당시 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 성장시켰을 뿐만 아니라 플루트 연주 등 예술적 재능과 관심까지 겸비하고 있었기에 계몽전제군주의 전형으로 여겨진다.또한 오스트리아와의 전쟁에서 승리를 거두어 독일 제국 내의 프로이센의 패권을 차지하였다. 오스트리아와 주변 강국에 맞선 외교전략과 전쟁을 통해 프로이센의 영토를 확장하고 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 만든 특출한 군사 전략가였다. 그는 신성 로마 제국의 해체와 독일 통일을 이루는 데 주도적 역할을 했다. 또한 군사 병력을 위해 국민징병제를 실시해 프로이센 남자들만 군입대를 시켜 군사훈련을 강화시켰다[1]는 평가도 있다.또한 가톨릭과 개신교간의 갈등이 극심했던 독일내 왕국, 공국들과는 다른, 모든 종교에 관용적인 정책을 폈고 보통교육을 확대했으며 성문헌법 제정작업에도 참여했다. 정치분야에서는 스스로를 국가의 첫 번째 종이라고 자처하면서 전제정치에 인간적인 자비로움을 접목시키려고 시도해 개화된 독재라는 평가를 받고 있다. 샤를마뉴, 나폴레옹과 함께 유럽의 위대한 지도자의 한 사람으로 꼽힌다. 그 공적을 기리기 위해 후세에 독일인들로부터 프리드리히 대왕(Friedrich der Große, Friedrich der Grosse, Friedrich the Great), 영광의 프리드리히(honor of Frederick) 등으로 불리게 된다.악습 폐지1740년 5월 31일 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세가 세상을 떠나자 프리드리히가 새 왕으로 즉위했다. 프리드리히 2세는 즉위하자마자 즉시 계몽주의적인 개혁정책에 돌입했다. 즉위 초기에 바로 고문 폐지, 언론 검열 폐지, 종교적 차별금지를 추진, 법으로 제정해 나갔고 즉위 초기에 오페라 극장 건설, 빈민구제, 거인 연대 폐지 등이 실행되었다. 선왕 때부터 원성이 자자했던 왕실 근위부대를 해산했다.학문부흥사업또한 죄수들에 대한 대사면을 단행하였지만, 죄인들의 죄질과 성격은 꼼꼼히 따져서 석방을 결정하는 등의 수완을 발휘했다. 학문을 멸시했던 선왕 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세의 반지성주의 아래 폐업이나 다름없는 상태였던 베를린 아카테미를 부흥시켜 과거에 추방되었던 학자들을 다시 불러들임으로써, 베를린은 ‘북방의 아테네’로 칭송받게 되었다. 프리드리히 2세 국왕 치세에 독일에서는 의무교육을 실시하는데, 국가의 통치이념을 교육하기 위한 것이었지만 의무교육은 독일 사람들이 글을 읽고 쓸 수 있도록 하였다.저술활동또한 볼테르의 도움으로 그는 《반(反) 마키아벨리론》을 공식 발표해 문단에 데뷔하기도 했다. 이 책은 자비·정의·의무·책임감을 바탕으로 한 군주의 윤리, 통치자의 윤리를 규정하고 있다. 그러나 그의 친구들뿐만 아니라 자기 자신조차도 놀랄 만큼 위축되었다. 그들은 적대 진영과 마찬가지로 예술애호와 자유방임을 주창하는 정권의 도래를 성급하게 환영했지만, 프리드리히가 선왕보다 못하다는 것을 발견했다.[4] 한편, 프리드리히 2세는 주위의 반대를 무릅쓰고 아버지로부터 물려받은 8만 명의 상비군을 더욱 증원시켜 차후에 있을 전쟁에 대비하였다.그는 신뢰, 책임감을 지도자의 최고의 덕목으로 규정했다. 목표 달성을 위해서 방법을 가리지 않는 것을 그는 불쾌히 여겼다.부국강병1744년 5월 24일 동프리슬란트 공작 카를 에드차르트(Carl Edzard)가 후계자 없이 사망하자 프리드리히는 동프리슬란트를 점령하여 병합하였다. 전후, 프리드리히 2세는 프로이센의 부흥을 위해 온 힘을 다했다.명실상부한 대왕의 위치를 굳히기 위해 프리드리히는 그동안 주창해온 시민국가에 대한 봉사·의무의 실현에 주력했다. 먼저 자신의 문학적 관심과 취미를 충족시키기 위해 노력했을 뿐만 아니라 예술과 과학의 열렬한 후원자임을 입증했다. 그는 책과 논문, 시 등 다양한 문학작품을 저술하는 데 심혈을 기울이고 정부 간행물에 대한 지원도 아끼지 않았다.[5] 세세한 일까지 자신이 직접 확인하였으며, 산업 진흥과 이민자 수용 등을 통해 프로이센은 다시 국력을 키워갔다.또한 직접 '앞으로 1마리의 고양이라도 공격하지 않을 것'이라면서 불가피한 경우를 제외하고 일체의 전쟁을 중단하겠다고 선언하여 평화의지를 과시하는 한편, 예상되는 외부침략에 대비해 군대를 훈련시키고 기병을 강화했다.[5] 병력 증강과 군비를 늘리게 되자 오스트리아와 남부 독일 지방의 소왕국, 공국들은 다시 긴장했고, 그의 평화론에 의문을 제기하며 다시 오스트리아를 중심으로 똘똘 뭉쳤다. 그러나 오랜 격무 탓에 프리드리히 2세의 건강은 갈수록 나빠졌다. 그러나 평화로운 날은 오래 가지 못했다.이후 그는 바쁜 정무 와중에도 틈틈이 시간을 내어 서신 왕래나 플룻 연주, 저술활동을 즐기며 지낸다. 그러나 프리드리히는 처음부터 몇몇 소수의 친밀한 인사들과 교류하며 제한적인 인간관계를 형성했다. 또한 그는 사람을 경멸하는 태도를 드러내 귀족들과 관료, 외교관들의 비위를 건드리기도 했다.[6] 생애 후반에 갈수록 그의 인간 불신, 인간 혐오는 심해졌다.만년의 프리드리히 2세는 그의 가족이나 친구가 모두 죽자, 점차 고독해 하고 다른 사람을 멀리하기 시작했다. 그는 수많은 예술가들을 궁정으로 초대하여 시인, 음악가 등을 재정적으로 후원하는 등 문화예술인의 보호자를 자처했다. 그러나 그의 고독과 인간 불신은 사라지지 않았다. 오직 애견 그레이하운드들만이 그의 위로대상이었다.그 때문에 원체 허약했던 몸이 한층 더 악화되어 심장 발작이나 호흡 곤란에 시달리면서 하루의 대부분을 의자에 앉아 보냈다. 그는 마지막 소원이라면서 애견들 곁에 묻어달라고 부탁했다고 한다.프리드리히 2세는 1786년 8월 17일 포츠담의 상수시 궁전에서 갑작스레 죽게 된다. 당시 대왕의 나이는 74세였다.Frederick II (German: Friedrich II.; 24 January 1712 – 17 August 1786) was the monarch of Prussia from 1740 until his death in 1786. He was the last Hohenzollern monarch titled King in Prussia, declaring himself King of Prussia after annexing Royal Prussia from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1772. His most significant accomplishments include military successes in the Silesian wars, reorganisation of the Prussian Army, the First Partition of Poland, and patronage of the arts and the Enlightenment. Prussia greatly increased its territories and became a major military power in Europe under his rule. He became known as Frederick the Great (German: Friedrich der Große) and was nicknamed "Old Fritz" (German: der Alte Fritz).-----------------프레드렉,프리드리히대왕에 대한 고찰목격관찰결과 : 은하연합참조, 상부참조. 프리드리히대왕->고구려상장군 을지문덕 -> 임경업 -> 프리드리히대왕 -> 빌헬름왕가 빌헬름 1세프리드리히 3세빌헬름 2세 병행 -> 비스마르크 병행 (이 과정부터 기미두(박원규,원균,프리프라바라티,아이젠하워,펠레콘),이건희(필립공 영국여왕남편, 웨일즈왕가원시조상왕격,삼성그룹2대총수,중국국가상무위원 위정성계열-루퍼쓰,아루쓰로서 기미두아종)가 개입하여 아돌프히틀러, 히믈러(독고신, 말데크독룡), 구데리안(이재용,필립보로서 열두사도로 위장된 중국놈 이재용 당현종-이건희프로젝트로 유인된후 살해되어 이건희가 만든 지옥맵,이건희서재에 감금구속된 박종권이가 과거 용강리박종권시절부터 이복순의 음모로서 기미두,당고모(측천무후,기미두원아종)안일규(라이라12주신-대흑암지옥마귀대장12놈, 라이라여주신,임청하,삼합회회장놈이자 중국을 장악한 라이라주신급인 동시에 라마12승의 원조격, 라마12승은 훗날 여호와라고 불리는 이상한 놈들로 위승격, 측천무후의 아들, 슈퍼맨을 죽이고 불구자로 만든 루퍼쓰놈)가 위조작하여 만든 이영애(이영애는 최초 당고모 측천무후년이 주제에 안맞게 제년이 이영애를 한다며 최초시발하였으나 더럽고 추하고 촌스럽고 부적합하여 박종권이가 대리하여 간신히 이영애역할을 한 것으로 목격관찰, 이 과정에서 이복순이가 이영애로 박종권이를 유인하는데 그게 용강리 박종권이었으며, 박종권이의 경우는 이분화되어 한쪽은 을지문덕계열의 임경업, 다른 한쪽은 이영애로 연결되는 세종대왕라인으로 이분화되며, 이 세종대왕라인은 다시 원신라 박혁거세, 원효대사와 연결됨을 목격관찰하다. 여기서 박종권이의 원본래를 말한다면 을지문덕계통의 임경업, 최배달이 원본래이며 세종대왕과 박혁거세의 경우는, 이 새끼들의 불국토제안, 부모자식관계제안, 내가 과거에는 그랬지만 이제는 안 그러려고 한다는 간교한 속임수에 속아서 이중분기된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 특히 세종대왕의 경우는, 허다한 인육죄업,5대죄업으로 나치독일패망, 대영제국패망, 미국경제와해등으로 존폐의 기로에 선 인육무리들, 대흑암지옥마귀들로서의 이른바 지구지배계층놈들이 회생하기 위한 편법으로서 제안된 것으로서, 세종대왕을 악용하여 실제로는 제2차세계대전종결후 가난궁핍속에서 고통받아야 했던 무리들이 회생하게 된 이유가 되었음을 목격관찰하다. 세종대왕으로 인하여, 독일의 라인강기적이 왔으며, 일본경제의 부흥이 왔으며, 미국경제가 회생되었으며, 망해가던 대영제국이 다시 영연방으로 올라서는데 그 과정에서 이 대흑암지옥의 패역한 무리들이 그러한 일을 해준 세종대왕과 프리드리히대왕, 명치천황, 임경업, 이순신등을 모두 배후를 쳐서 살인하여 죽이고 이영애로 만든후 남경대학살에서 목을 잘라 참살하고, 현생하급하층민으로 대속되어 나자렛예수대속희생양으로 전락한 박종권이까지 죽이려 드는 사태로 파급되다로 목격관찰되다.(참조 : 제2차 세계 대전 이후 경제 팽창은 전후 경제 호황 또는 자본주의의 황금기[1][2]로도 알려져 있으며, 제2차 세계 대전의 여파와 함께 시작되어 1973~1975년 경기후퇴로 끝난 전 세계적인 경제 팽창 기간을 말한다.[1] 특히 미국, 소련, 오스트레일리아와 서유럽 및 동아시아 국가들은 완전 고용과 함께 이례적으로 높고 지속적인 성장을 경험했다.초기의 예측과 달리, 이 높은 성장은 일본(고도경제성장), 서독과 오스트리아(라인강의 기적), 대한민국(한강의 기적), 벨기에(벨기에의 경제 기적), 프랑스(영광의 30년), 이탈리아(이탈리아의 경제 기적) 및 그리스(그리스의 경제 기적)와 같이 전쟁으로 폐허가 된 많은 국가를 포함했다. 심지어 스웨덴(기록 시대)과 같이 전쟁의 영향을 비교적 덜 받은 국가들도 상당한 경제 성장을 경험했다.-> 이러한 경제회생기적은 근본적으로는 세종대왕의 선업공덕을 찬립한 결과로서, 20000인의 아르하트급박종권 복제복사를 통하여 독일의 경제부흥과 일본경제부흥이 성취되었음을 목격관찰하다. 이들의 원업과 원성품상 이와같은 일은 절대로 불가능했다. 독일은 프리드리히대왕, 일본은 명치유신의 명치천황에 의한 부흥이며 전전에는 이와같았으되 전후에는 이들의 허다한 중죄업(인육죄업,5대죄업등 무서운 죄업들)으로 인해 잘 먹고 잘 살고 선진부국이 된 다는 것이 아예 불가능했으나, 세종대왕을 내세워 이를 간신히 모면한 것으로 목격관찰되는데 다만 이 세종대왕조차도, 우중문이라는 놈이 제놈 주제에 하나님이 되겠다며 세종대왕을 때려죽이고 준성단급 품격과 등급, 선업공덕을 강제로 찬탈찬립하여 자행함으로서 종국에는 제3차세계대전이 발발하게 된 주요이유가 된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이재용이 놈은, 루마니아왕조의 시조왕으로서 현재 차우셰쿠스놈이며, 이병철,이건희,이재용,박원규 이 네놈이 누리는 부귀영화와 영광은 이루 말로 표현할수 없었으나 이들을 이렇게 만들어준 주역들은 하급인축생인박종권으로 전락되어 음옥과 무간지옥 팔대구천지옥과 팔승지옥등 무서운 지옥을 떠도는 망령이 되었다. 이와같이 된 주요원인을 보면, 첫째는 부처로 알려진 잡놈인데 이 새끼가 해탈성불하기 위하여 박종권이를 부처인육대속을 자행했으며, 두번째는 나자렛예수인데, 우중문이 같이 무식무지미개한 놈으로서 영광의 하나님(준성단급)이 되겠다며 강제로 임의대속을 자행하여 골고다언덕에서 열두사도로 위장한 말데크인육룡들이 담합하여 때려죽인후, 영구죽음을 자행하고 이 글을 쓰는 하급하층민 축생급박종권으로 전락시킨후 이영애를 만들어 음옥에 처박은후, 다시 이 이영애를 이재용이 새끼를 시켜서 목을 잘라 죽인후 당고종놈에게 바치고, 양귀비를 만든후, 다시 측천무후가 된 당고모놈(바바라핸드클로우로서 아주 지적이고 참한 외계플레이아데스여성으로 위장, 박종권아르하트급의 좋은 것을 이영애를 죽이고 모조리 빼앗은 결과, 실제로 이 당고모라는 놈은 기미두자신이다. 마거릿힐다대처도 마찬가지로 기미두놈 그 자신인데, 이 씹새끼는 제놈의 현생아들 박종권이라는 것을 알면서도 무려 17번에 걸쳐서 칠천량해전맵과 남경대학살맵등에서 목을 잘라서 참살하여 죽이고 좋은 것을 빼앗으며 종국에는 마거릿힐다대처까지 된 놈으로 목격관찰되다. 이영애가 된 박종권이는 당고모놈 측천무후놈이 때려죽였으며, 이후 사지를 절단하고 변소측간에 처박은 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이와같이 잔인하고 흉포하고 간악한 놈들로서 절대로 인육주식하는 놈들과는 일을 해서는 안되며 동행해서도 안된다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 최초에 어떤 개새끼가 이런 프로젝트를 기안하고 실행했는지 반드시 시간의 제한없이 영구추적하여 밝히고 중처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것)이들 스스로는 이와같은 일을 할수 없다는 것이 매우 명백하다는 것이 목격관찰결과이다.이 호황은 냉전이 절정에 달했을 때 포스트모더니즘, 탈식민지화, 소비주의의 현저한 증가, 복지국가, 우주 경쟁, 비동맹 운동, 수입 대체 산업화, 1960년대 반문화, 제2세대 여성주의의 시작, 핵 군비 경쟁을 포함한 광범위한 글로벌 변화의 조건을 형성했다. 이와같은 일은, 한순조,동탁,장비,항우의 연장선상인 이건희놈과 박종권이의 현생거짓애비놈 박원규(원균이자 프타이며 아이젠하워이며 펠레콘이 된 놈, 나자렛예수의 거짓애비 성요셉역할을 한 말데크곤충룡, 말데크개룡)놈이 영구복락을 목적으로, 나자렛예수2차대속을 자행하려하여 사태가 이와같이 악화된 이유로 목격관찰되다. 이들은 인육주식하며 반우주마귀들로서 사람으로서 살아이영애를 당고종에게 바쳐 측천무후가 이영애를 때려죽이게 만든 놈이며 삼성그룹3대총수이자 당현종인 놈이 나자렛예수음모에 적극개입하여 열두사도놈으로 위장, 필립보가 되다. 개나 소나 전부 여호와가 된 이유), 헤르만괴링, 롬멜등 5인의 나치지도자놈들이 프리드리히대왕을 해코지하여 살해)오토 에두아르트 레오폴트 폰 비스마르크쇤하우젠 후작(독일어: Otto Eduard Leopold Fürst von Bismarck-Schönhausen, 1815년 4월 1일 ~ 1898년 7월 30일)은 독일을 통일하여 독일 제국을 건설한 프로이센의 외교관이자 정치인이다. -> 비스마르크시기부터 기미두놈이 독고신(히틀러)놈으로 개입하여 프리드리히대왕을 사라예보폭탄테러에서 죽였으며, 이에 대한 후유증으로 심각한 고통의 지옥에 감금되는데, 장소와 영역을 보면, 화성이었던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 화성에 도시가 건설되었으며 이는 영화 토탈리콜에 묘사된 것과 같으며, 한 시기 말데크악룡놈이 화성도시에서 살았던 것이 목격관찰되고, 이 시기의 화성 역시 오늘날의 지구와 동일한 체계로서 움직인 것으로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕시대는 이 화성으로 확장된다로 목격관찰되다. 화성과 해왕성 그리고 달은 서로 겹쳐지는바, 이 세군데가 모두 인육제조시설을 갖춘 인육주식장소로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕 사후 필사적인 탈출과정에서 고구려가 제안되는데, 고구려상장군이 바로 프리드리히대왕일계로 목격관찰되고 다시 을지문덕계가 임경업, 최배달과 일계로서 관찰되는데, 지금 기미두와 이건희,이재용이 놈이 마구잡이로 패죽이고 찢어죽이는 대상은 프리드리히대왕,고구려상장군을지문덕계로서의 임경업이며, 임경업이를 패죽이려고 자행하는 놈이 바로 조선선조 우중문이 놈과 이상노(광해군놈으로서 현생박종권이의 외삼촌이나 말데크촌수로는 동생놈 박종성이 놈임, 이양순이도 동생놈 박종성이고 박종성이가 분기하여 이노임, 이양순, 이상노, 이현순이 되는 과정에 목격관찰되다. 박종성이 놈은 현생동생이다.)로서 임경업이는 또 대우그룹 창업자와 연관되는데, 대우그룹을 잡고, 프리드리히도 잡으려는 목적으로 만든 캐릭터가 임경업으로 목격관찰되다. 그리고 임경업이는 정밀관찰시 박종권 나 자신이다. 박종권원본래를 때려죽이려고 제안된 캐릭터가 임경업이다. 그리고 그렇게 하는 놈이 외삼촌을 주장하는 이상노라는 놈인데, 이 새끼는 영국왕조지5세이자 조선광해군으로 목격관찰되고 이어서 육영수라는 잡년으로 목격관찰된다. 임경업의 경우, 내가 보건대, 이상노가 외삼촌이고 이중근이가 외조부로서 호감과 선의로서 돕고자 참여한 캐릭터이고 이유를 보면 왕을 하기에는 이상노가 부족했으므로 이것을 보완해주는 목적이었으나 이 패악패역한 놈들이 이를 악용하여 나를 죽인 것이다. 이게 내 외조부놈이고 내 외삼촌놈이며 내 어미,애비였다. 이 문제를 상부에 고소하고, 이들 전원을 재판에 회부하여 영구파문할것, 영구죽음처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것. 특히 나의 원등급원지위원서열원신분상 직접무력폭력폭행구타는 거의 불가능한데도 마구잡이 구타폭력이 자행되는 이유는 부모자식관계로서 특히 박원규(기미두,아이젠하워)놈이며, 이 새끼가 직접무력폭행하는 놈으로서, 마거릿힐다대처라는 놈이 나를 직접 무력구타폭행한 이유가 바로 기미두놈이 마거릿힐다대처였기에 가능했던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 부모자식관계를 악용한 해코지를 엄중처벌하고 박원규,이복순을 영구파문할것, 영구추방할것, 함께 하지 않는다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것 기존의 가족친인척관계 전체를 영구파문할것 단 한놈도 가족친인척이 아니며 단 한놈도 친구가 없었다로 전원영구파문할것 전원 함께 하지 않는다로 지속적처리할것 고통은 이건희같은 하등무식무지미개한 놈이 내가 했던 역할을 제놈이 한 것으로 처리하겠다며 들러붙어 있는 것에서 오는바, 이 자를 영구파문할것 영구죽음시킬것 지속적처리할것(기미두 동일, 우리가 관찰한바로는 미물버러지수준밖에 안되는 놈들로서 이들이 사는 초극렬지옥에서는 장군노릇을 할지 모르나, 상급상위상천계로 오면 졸지에 미물버러지로 전락되는 놈들로 목격관찰되다) Frederick II프리드리히 2세을지문덕(乙支文德The SakaSiddhartha GautamatheBuddha예수JesusofNazareth임경업(林慶業靈魂魄等級右側女子之眼 靈魂魄等級

프리드리히 2세(독일어: Friedrich II, 1712년 1월 24일 ~ 1786년 8월 17일)는 독일 프로이센 왕국의 제3대 프로이센 국왕이다(재위 : 1740년 5월 31일 - 1786년 8월 17일). 종교에 대한 관용 정책을 펼치고 재판과정에서 고문을 근절한 계몽군주였다.국가를 통치하고 인재를 기용하는 것과 군대 조직과 군대의 지휘, 정복전쟁 지휘를 직접 담당하는 등의 역할을 모두 빈틈없이 해결했다. 뛰어난 군사적 재능과 합리적인 국가경영을 발휘해 프로이센을 당시 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 성장시켰을 뿐만 아니라 플루트 연주 등 예술적 재능과 관심까지 겸비하고 있었기에 계몽전제군주의 전형으로 여겨진다.또한 오스트리아와의 전쟁에서 승리를 거두어 독일 제국 내의 프로이센의 패권을 차지하였다. 오스트리아와 주변 강국에 맞선 외교전략과 전쟁을 통해 프로이센의 영토를 확장하고 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 만든 특출한 군사 전략가였다. 그는 신성 로마 제국의 해체와 독일 통일을 이루는 데 주도적 역할을 했다. 또한 군사 병력을 위해 국민징병제를 실시해 프로이센 남자들만 군입대를 시켜 군사훈련을 강화시켰다[1]는 평가도 있다.또한 가톨릭과 개신교간의 갈등이 극심했던 독일내 왕국, 공국들과는 다른, 모든 종교에 관용적인 정책을 폈고 보통교육을 확대했으며 성문헌법 제정작업에도 참여했다. 정치분야에서는 스스로를 국가의 첫 번째 종이라고 자처하면서 전제정치에 인간적인 자비로움을 접목시키려고 시도해 개화된 독재라는 평가를 받고 있다. 샤를마뉴, 나폴레옹과 함께 유럽의 위대한 지도자의 한 사람으로 꼽힌다. 그 공적을 기리기 위해 후세에 독일인들로부터 프리드리히 대왕(Friedrich der Große, Friedrich der Grosse, Friedrich the Great), 영광의 프리드리히(honor of Frederick) 등으로 불리게 된다.악습 폐지1740년 5월 31일 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세가 세상을 떠나자 프리드리히가 새 왕으로 즉위했다. 프리드리히 2세는 즉위하자마자 즉시 계몽주의적인 개혁정책에 돌입했다. 즉위 초기에 바로 고문 폐지, 언론 검열 폐지, 종교적 차별금지를 추진, 법으로 제정해 나갔고 즉위 초기에 오페라 극장 건설, 빈민구제, 거인 연대 폐지 등이 실행되었다. 선왕 때부터 원성이 자자했던 왕실 근위부대를 해산했다.학문부흥사업또한 죄수들에 대한 대사면을 단행하였지만, 죄인들의 죄질과 성격은 꼼꼼히 따져서 석방을 결정하는 등의 수완을 발휘했다. 학문을 멸시했던 선왕 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세의 반지성주의 아래 폐업이나 다름없는 상태였던 베를린 아카테미를 부흥시켜 과거에 추방되었던 학자들을 다시 불러들임으로써, 베를린은 ‘북방의 아테네’로 칭송받게 되었다. 프리드리히 2세 국왕 치세에 독일에서는 의무교육을 실시하는데, 국가의 통치이념을 교육하기 위한 것이었지만 의무교육은 독일 사람들이 글을 읽고 쓸 수 있도록 하였다.저술활동또한 볼테르의 도움으로 그는 《반(反) 마키아벨리론》을 공식 발표해 문단에 데뷔하기도 했다. 이 책은 자비·정의·의무·책임감을 바탕으로 한 군주의 윤리, 통치자의 윤리를 규정하고 있다. 그러나 그의 친구들뿐만 아니라 자기 자신조차도 놀랄 만큼 위축되었다. 그들은 적대 진영과 마찬가지로 예술애호와 자유방임을 주창하는 정권의 도래를 성급하게 환영했지만, 프리드리히가 선왕보다 못하다는 것을 발견했다.[4] 한편, 프리드리히 2세는 주위의 반대를 무릅쓰고 아버지로부터 물려받은 8만 명의 상비군을 더욱 증원시켜 차후에 있을 전쟁에 대비하였다.그는 신뢰, 책임감을 지도자의 최고의 덕목으로 규정했다. 목표 달성을 위해서 방법을 가리지 않는 것을 그는 불쾌히 여겼다.부국강병1744년 5월 24일 동프리슬란트 공작 카를 에드차르트(Carl Edzard)가 후계자 없이 사망하자 프리드리히는 동프리슬란트를 점령하여 병합하였다. 전후, 프리드리히 2세는 프로이센의 부흥을 위해 온 힘을 다했다.명실상부한 대왕의 위치를 굳히기 위해 프리드리히는 그동안 주창해온 시민국가에 대한 봉사·의무의 실현에 주력했다. 먼저 자신의 문학적 관심과 취미를 충족시키기 위해 노력했을 뿐만 아니라 예술과 과학의 열렬한 후원자임을 입증했다. 그는 책과 논문, 시 등 다양한 문학작품을 저술하는 데 심혈을 기울이고 정부 간행물에 대한 지원도 아끼지 않았다.[5] 세세한 일까지 자신이 직접 확인하였으며, 산업 진흥과 이민자 수용 등을 통해 프로이센은 다시 국력을 키워갔다.또한 직접 '앞으로 1마리의 고양이라도 공격하지 않을 것'이라면서 불가피한 경우를 제외하고 일체의 전쟁을 중단하겠다고 선언하여 평화의지를 과시하는 한편, 예상되는 외부침략에 대비해 군대를 훈련시키고 기병을 강화했다.[5] 병력 증강과 군비를 늘리게 되자 오스트리아와 남부 독일 지방의 소왕국, 공국들은 다시 긴장했고, 그의 평화론에 의문을 제기하며 다시 오스트리아를 중심으로 똘똘 뭉쳤다. 그러나 오랜 격무 탓에 프리드리히 2세의 건강은 갈수록 나빠졌다. 그러나 평화로운 날은 오래 가지 못했다.이후 그는 바쁜 정무 와중에도 틈틈이 시간을 내어 서신 왕래나 플룻 연주, 저술활동을 즐기며 지낸다. 그러나 프리드리히는 처음부터 몇몇 소수의 친밀한 인사들과 교류하며 제한적인 인간관계를 형성했다. 또한 그는 사람을 경멸하는 태도를 드러내 귀족들과 관료, 외교관들의 비위를 건드리기도 했다.[6] 생애 후반에 갈수록 그의 인간 불신, 인간 혐오는 심해졌다.만년의 프리드리히 2세는 그의 가족이나 친구가 모두 죽자, 점차 고독해 하고 다른 사람을 멀리하기 시작했다. 그는 수많은 예술가들을 궁정으로 초대하여 시인, 음악가 등을 재정적으로 후원하는 등 문화예술인의 보호자를 자처했다. 그러나 그의 고독과 인간 불신은 사라지지 않았다. 오직 애견 그레이하운드들만이 그의 위로대상이었다.그 때문에 원체 허약했던 몸이 한층 더 악화되어 심장 발작이나 호흡 곤란에 시달리면서 하루의 대부분을 의자에 앉아 보냈다. 그는 마지막 소원이라면서 애견들 곁에 묻어달라고 부탁했다고 한다.프리드리히 2세는 1786년 8월 17일 포츠담의 상수시 궁전에서 갑작스레 죽게 된다. 당시 대왕의 나이는 74세였다.Frederick II (German: Friedrich II.; 24 January 1712 – 17 August 1786) was the monarch of Prussia from 1740 until his death in 1786. He was the last Hohenzollern monarch titled King in Prussia, declaring himself King of Prussia after annexing Royal Prussia from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1772. His most significant accomplishments include military successes in the Silesian wars, reorganisation of the Prussian Army, the First Partition of Poland, and patronage of the arts and the Enlightenment. Prussia greatly increased its territories and became a major military power in Europe under his rule. He became known as Frederick the Great (German: Friedrich der Große) and was nicknamed "Old Fritz" (German: der Alte Fritz).-----------------프레드렉,프리드리히대왕에 대한 고찰목격관찰결과 : 은하연합참조, 상부참조. 프리드리히대왕->고구려상장군 을지문덕 -> 임경업 -> 프리드리히대왕 -> 빌헬름왕가 빌헬름 1세프리드리히 3세빌헬름 2세 병행 -> 비스마르크 병행 (이 과정부터 기미두(박원규,원균,프리프라바라티,아이젠하워,펠레콘),이건희(필립공 영국여왕남편, 웨일즈왕가원시조상왕격,삼성그룹2대총수,중국국가상무위원 위정성계열-루퍼쓰,아루쓰로서 기미두아종)가 개입하여 아돌프히틀러, 히믈러(독고신, 말데크독룡), 구데리안(이재용,필립보로서 열두사도로 위장된 중국놈 이재용 당현종-이건희프로젝트로 유인된후 살해되어 이건희가 만든 지옥맵,이건희서재에 감금구속된 박종권이가 과거 용강리박종권시절부터 이복순의 음모로서 기미두,당고모(측천무후,기미두원아종)안일규(라이라12주신-대흑암지옥마귀대장12놈, 라이라여주신,임청하,삼합회회장놈이자 중국을 장악한 라이라주신급인 동시에 라마12승의 원조격, 라마12승은 훗날 여호와라고 불리는 이상한 놈들로 위승격, 측천무후의 아들, 슈퍼맨을 죽이고 불구자로 만든 루퍼쓰놈)가 위조작하여 만든 이영애(이영애는 최초 당고모 측천무후년이 주제에 안맞게 제년이 이영애를 한다며 최초시발하였으나 더럽고 추하고 촌스럽고 부적합하여 박종권이가 대리하여 간신히 이영애역할을 한 것으로 목격관찰, 이 과정에서 이복순이가 이영애로 박종권이를 유인하는데 그게 용강리 박종권이었으며, 박종권이의 경우는 이분화되어 한쪽은 을지문덕계열의 임경업, 다른 한쪽은 이영애로 연결되는 세종대왕라인으로 이분화되며, 이 세종대왕라인은 다시 원신라 박혁거세, 원효대사와 연결됨을 목격관찰하다. 여기서 박종권이의 원본래를 말한다면 을지문덕계통의 임경업, 최배달이 원본래이며 세종대왕과 박혁거세의 경우는, 이 새끼들의 불국토제안, 부모자식관계제안, 내가 과거에는 그랬지만 이제는 안 그러려고 한다는 간교한 속임수에 속아서 이중분기된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 특히 세종대왕의 경우는, 허다한 인육죄업,5대죄업으로 나치독일패망, 대영제국패망, 미국경제와해등으로 존폐의 기로에 선 인육무리들, 대흑암지옥마귀들로서의 이른바 지구지배계층놈들이 회생하기 위한 편법으로서 제안된 것으로서, 세종대왕을 악용하여 실제로는 제2차세계대전종결후 가난궁핍속에서 고통받아야 했던 무리들이 회생하게 된 이유가 되었음을 목격관찰하다. 세종대왕으로 인하여, 독일의 라인강기적이 왔으며, 일본경제의 부흥이 왔으며, 미국경제가 회생되었으며, 망해가던 대영제국이 다시 영연방으로 올라서는데 그 과정에서 이 대흑암지옥의 패역한 무리들이 그러한 일을 해준 세종대왕과 프리드리히대왕, 명치천황, 임경업, 이순신등을 모두 배후를 쳐서 살인하여 죽이고 이영애로 만든후 남경대학살에서 목을 잘라 참살하고, 현생하급하층민으로 대속되어 나자렛예수대속희생양으로 전락한 박종권이까지 죽이려 드는 사태로 파급되다로 목격관찰되다.(참조 : 제2차 세계 대전 이후 경제 팽창은 전후 경제 호황 또는 자본주의의 황금기[1][2]로도 알려져 있으며, 제2차 세계 대전의 여파와 함께 시작되어 1973~1975년 경기후퇴로 끝난 전 세계적인 경제 팽창 기간을 말한다.[1] 특히 미국, 소련, 오스트레일리아와 서유럽 및 동아시아 국가들은 완전 고용과 함께 이례적으로 높고 지속적인 성장을 경험했다.초기의 예측과 달리, 이 높은 성장은 일본(고도경제성장), 서독과 오스트리아(라인강의 기적), 대한민국(한강의 기적), 벨기에(벨기에의 경제 기적), 프랑스(영광의 30년), 이탈리아(이탈리아의 경제 기적) 및 그리스(그리스의 경제 기적)와 같이 전쟁으로 폐허가 된 많은 국가를 포함했다. 심지어 스웨덴(기록 시대)과 같이 전쟁의 영향을 비교적 덜 받은 국가들도 상당한 경제 성장을 경험했다.-> 이러한 경제회생기적은 근본적으로는 세종대왕의 선업공덕을 찬립한 결과로서, 20000인의 아르하트급박종권 복제복사를 통하여 독일의 경제부흥과 일본경제부흥이 성취되었음을 목격관찰하다. 이들의 원업과 원성품상 이와같은 일은 절대로 불가능했다. 독일은 프리드리히대왕, 일본은 명치유신의 명치천황에 의한 부흥이며 전전에는 이와같았으되 전후에는 이들의 허다한 중죄업(인육죄업,5대죄업등 무서운 죄업들)으로 인해 잘 먹고 잘 살고 선진부국이 된 다는 것이 아예 불가능했으나, 세종대왕을 내세워 이를 간신히 모면한 것으로 목격관찰되는데 다만 이 세종대왕조차도, 우중문이라는 놈이 제놈 주제에 하나님이 되겠다며 세종대왕을 때려죽이고 준성단급 품격과 등급, 선업공덕을 강제로 찬탈찬립하여 자행함으로서 종국에는 제3차세계대전이 발발하게 된 주요이유가 된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이재용이 놈은, 루마니아왕조의 시조왕으로서 현재 차우셰쿠스놈이며, 이병철,이건희,이재용,박원규 이 네놈이 누리는 부귀영화와 영광은 이루 말로 표현할수 없었으나 이들을 이렇게 만들어준 주역들은 하급인축생인박종권으로 전락되어 음옥과 무간지옥 팔대구천지옥과 팔승지옥등 무서운 지옥을 떠도는 망령이 되었다. 이와같이 된 주요원인을 보면, 첫째는 부처로 알려진 잡놈인데 이 새끼가 해탈성불하기 위하여 박종권이를 부처인육대속을 자행했으며, 두번째는 나자렛예수인데, 우중문이 같이 무식무지미개한 놈으로서 영광의 하나님(준성단급)이 되겠다며 강제로 임의대속을 자행하여 골고다언덕에서 열두사도로 위장한 말데크인육룡들이 담합하여 때려죽인후, 영구죽음을 자행하고 이 글을 쓰는 하급하층민 축생급박종권으로 전락시킨후 이영애를 만들어 음옥에 처박은후, 다시 이 이영애를 이재용이 새끼를 시켜서 목을 잘라 죽인후 당고종놈에게 바치고, 양귀비를 만든후, 다시 측천무후가 된 당고모놈(바바라핸드클로우로서 아주 지적이고 참한 외계플레이아데스여성으로 위장, 박종권아르하트급의 좋은 것을 이영애를 죽이고 모조리 빼앗은 결과, 실제로 이 당고모라는 놈은 기미두자신이다. 마거릿힐다대처도 마찬가지로 기미두놈 그 자신인데, 이 씹새끼는 제놈의 현생아들 박종권이라는 것을 알면서도 무려 17번에 걸쳐서 칠천량해전맵과 남경대학살맵등에서 목을 잘라서 참살하여 죽이고 좋은 것을 빼앗으며 종국에는 마거릿힐다대처까지 된 놈으로 목격관찰되다. 이영애가 된 박종권이는 당고모놈 측천무후놈이 때려죽였으며, 이후 사지를 절단하고 변소측간에 처박은 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이와같이 잔인하고 흉포하고 간악한 놈들로서 절대로 인육주식하는 놈들과는 일을 해서는 안되며 동행해서도 안된다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 최초에 어떤 개새끼가 이런 프로젝트를 기안하고 실행했는지 반드시 시간의 제한없이 영구추적하여 밝히고 중처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것)이들 스스로는 이와같은 일을 할수 없다는 것이 매우 명백하다는 것이 목격관찰결과이다.이 호황은 냉전이 절정에 달했을 때 포스트모더니즘, 탈식민지화, 소비주의의 현저한 증가, 복지국가, 우주 경쟁, 비동맹 운동, 수입 대체 산업화, 1960년대 반문화, 제2세대 여성주의의 시작, 핵 군비 경쟁을 포함한 광범위한 글로벌 변화의 조건을 형성했다. 이와같은 일은, 한순조,동탁,장비,항우의 연장선상인 이건희놈과 박종권이의 현생거짓애비놈 박원규(원균이자 프타이며 아이젠하워이며 펠레콘이 된 놈, 나자렛예수의 거짓애비 성요셉역할을 한 말데크곤충룡, 말데크개룡)놈이 영구복락을 목적으로, 나자렛예수2차대속을 자행하려하여 사태가 이와같이 악화된 이유로 목격관찰되다. 이들은 인육주식하며 반우주마귀들로서 사람으로서 살아이영애를 당고종에게 바쳐 측천무후가 이영애를 때려죽이게 만든 놈이며 삼성그룹3대총수이자 당현종인 놈이 나자렛예수음모에 적극개입하여 열두사도놈으로 위장, 필립보가 되다. 개나 소나 전부 여호와가 된 이유), 헤르만괴링, 롬멜등 5인의 나치지도자놈들이 프리드리히대왕을 해코지하여 살해)오토 에두아르트 레오폴트 폰 비스마르크쇤하우젠 후작(독일어: Otto Eduard Leopold Fürst von Bismarck-Schönhausen, 1815년 4월 1일 ~ 1898년 7월 30일)은 독일을 통일하여 독일 제국을 건설한 프로이센의 외교관이자 정치인이다. -> 비스마르크시기부터 기미두놈이 독고신(히틀러)놈으로 개입하여 프리드리히대왕을 사라예보폭탄테러에서 죽였으며, 이에 대한 후유증으로 심각한 고통의 지옥에 감금되는데, 장소와 영역을 보면, 화성이었던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 화성에 도시가 건설되었으며 이는 영화 토탈리콜에 묘사된 것과 같으며, 한 시기 말데크악룡놈이 화성도시에서 살았던 것이 목격관찰되고, 이 시기의 화성 역시 오늘날의 지구와 동일한 체계로서 움직인 것으로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕시대는 이 화성으로 확장된다로 목격관찰되다. 화성과 해왕성 그리고 달은 서로 겹쳐지는바, 이 세군데가 모두 인육제조시설을 갖춘 인육주식장소로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕 사후 필사적인 탈출과정에서 고구려가 제안되는데, 고구려상장군이 바로 프리드리히대왕일계로 목격관찰되고 다시 을지문덕계가 임경업, 최배달과 일계로서 관찰되는데, 지금 기미두와 이건희,이재용이 놈이 마구잡이로 패죽이고 찢어죽이는 대상은 프리드리히대왕,고구려상장군을지문덕계로서의 임경업이며, 임경업이를 패죽이려고 자행하는 놈이 바로 조선선조 우중문이 놈과 이상노(광해군놈으로서 현생박종권이의 외삼촌이나 말데크촌수로는 동생놈 박종성이 놈임, 이양순이도 동생놈 박종성이고 박종성이가 분기하여 이노임, 이양순, 이상노, 이현순이 되는 과정에 목격관찰되다. 박종성이 놈은 현생동생이다.)로서 임경업이는 또 대우그룹 창업자와 연관되는데, 대우그룹을 잡고, 프리드리히도 잡으려는 목적으로 만든 캐릭터가 임경업으로 목격관찰되다. 그리고 임경업이는 정밀관찰시 박종권 나 자신이다. 박종권원본래를 때려죽이려고 제안된 캐릭터가 임경업이다. 그리고 그렇게 하는 놈이 외삼촌을 주장하는 이상노라는 놈인데, 이 새끼는 영국왕조지5세이자 조선광해군으로 목격관찰되고 이어서 육영수라는 잡년으로 목격관찰된다. 임경업의 경우, 내가 보건대, 이상노가 외삼촌이고 이중근이가 외조부로서 호감과 선의로서 돕고자 참여한 캐릭터이고 이유를 보면 왕을 하기에는 이상노가 부족했으므로 이것을 보완해주는 목적이었으나 이 패악패역한 놈들이 이를 악용하여 나를 죽인 것이다. 이게 내 외조부놈이고 내 외삼촌놈이며 내 어미,애비였다. 이 문제를 상부에 고소하고, 이들 전원을 재판에 회부하여 영구파문할것, 영구죽음처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것. 특히 나의 원등급원지위원서열원신분상 직접무력폭력폭행구타는 거의 불가능한데도 마구잡이 구타폭력이 자행되는 이유는 부모자식관계로서 특히 박원규(기미두,아이젠하워)놈이며, 이 새끼가 직접무력폭행하는 놈으로서, 마거릿힐다대처라는 놈이 나를 직접 무력구타폭행한 이유가 바로 기미두놈이 마거릿힐다대처였기에 가능했던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 부모자식관계를 악용한 해코지를 엄중처벌하고 박원규,이복순을 영구파문할것, 영구추방할것, 함께 하지 않는다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것 기존의 가족친인척관계 전체를 영구파문할것 단 한놈도 가족친인척이 아니며 단 한놈도 친구가 없었다로 전원영구파문할것 전원 함께 하지 않는다로 지속적처리할것 고통은 이건희같은 하등무식무지미개한 놈이 내가 했던 역할을 제놈이 한 것으로 처리하겠다며 들러붙어 있는 것에서 오는바, 이 자를 영구파문할것 영구죽음시킬것 지속적처리할것(기미두 동일, 우리가 관찰한바로는 미물버러지수준밖에 안되는 놈들로서 이들이 사는 초극렬지옥에서는 장군노릇을 할지 모르나, 상급상위상천계로 오면 졸지에 미물버러지로 전락되는 놈들로 목격관찰되다) Frederick II프리드리히 2세을지문덕(乙支文德The SakaSiddhartha GautamatheBuddha예수JesusofNazareth임경업(林慶業靈魂魄等級右側女子之眼 靈魂魄等級

나는그렇게하겠다고한적이없다殺格簒奪下剋上나로서여자가되어진놈confirmwithstar cluster'sways원등급+22(이십이)品格位格人格奸惡凶惡狡猾나의피땀원등급원지위을·를살인강탈하여극상부귀극상음락하는놈630128-1067814朴鐘權的大億劫的削的磨的滅的處理的이승만李承晚1875년 3월 26일 ~ 1965년 7월 19일왕주王主kingmonarchthe LordMental breakdown간악성 奸惡性이재용소원(所願)이재용李在鎔삼성그룹 제3대 총수당 현종 이융기구에르세리온가귀네드가마스라발가호엔촐레른지크마링겐가하인츠 빌헬름 구데리안Atlantìs nêsosAge of Atlantis World MapA map of AtlantisAtlantisATLANTIS150000B.C.Maldek惡竜Maldek毒蠬Maldek混蠬이재용李在鎔삼성그룹 제3대 총수당 현종 이융기구에르세리온가귀네드가마스라발가호엔촐레른지크마링겐가하인츠 빌헬름 구데리안바바라핸드클로우이건희李健熙삼성 제2대 총수항우項羽초 장왕중국공산당 중앙정치국 상무위원회정치국 상무위원에든버러 공작 필립 공헤르만 빌헬름 괴링조동봉위만하인리히 루이트폴트 힘러아틀라스박종성미마쓰대한민국전도 大韓民國全圖a complete map of Korea, a map of the whole of KoreaThe universe우주宇宙world map세계 지도世界地圖세계전도만국지도 지구 전체, 또는 대부분을 보여주는 지도Age of Atlantis World MapAtlantisAtlantìs nêsosA map of Atlantis630128-1067814朴鐘權증평공립국민학교The Making of Atlantis大韓民國忠淸北道槐山郡曾坪邑校洞里大韓民國忠淸北道槐山郡曾坪邑曾坪里우측목right sideneckthroatgullethead右側咽喉噲嗌嗓㗋嚨喖哙㗇肮咙喉門食氣顙吭𡃡𣣼𡁐𠽥𦞈𦞕𠺠𠾰𦝪𠰸𡲙𠼙㖶胭臙颃𠰉頏䑍脰齸亢㰺喉舌頸颈頚𩒤The universe우주宇宙world map세계 지도世界地圖세계전도만국지도 지구 전체, 또는 대부분을 보여주는 지도630128-1067814朴鐘權的大億劫的削的磨的滅的處理的630128-1067814朴鐘權的大億劫的削的磨的滅的處理的智力着想發想아이디어(idea)意圖意向意味義差別流轉緣起4%artman我2%Artman我나는가르쳐달라고한적이없다나는그렇게말한적이없다나는그렇게하겠다고한적이없다대연각호텔 대화재 사고대한민국의 IMF 구제금융 요청Age of Atlantis World MapA map of AtlantisThe Making of AtlantisAtlantìs nêsosAtlantis이순신李舜臣여성성(女性性)Femininity (also called womanliness)아틀란티스원신체Atlantìs nêsos源身體세종類似Atlantis準Atlantis我吾余予身𢦖偺民塊朕愚𣦶𠎳卬孤子𠨐魚厶台儂𢦓𩇶喒俺𦨶喒𨖍姎𢓲𠮣𣍹𢀹𦩎𦩗𠨂𩇶𦨶𨈟𢦠𢦐唔核心意識體身己幹肉形骨中躬室軀干魄躳臗骵躯躰䏱軆躸形軀體膚𣎑𡰬𩪆𨈬𢀒𩪍𨊘𡦆𨉦𨈴𦡊𦣂宮体宍人窮耦浴現在意識體身己幹肉形骨中躬室軀干魄躳臗骵躯躰䏱軆躸形軀體膚𣎑𡰬𩪆𨈬𢀒𩪍𨊘𡦆𨉦𨈴𦡊𦣂宮体宍人窮耦浴朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814戶籍謄本戶籍抄本住民登錄抄本275000B.C.朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814戶籍謄本戶籍抄本住民登錄抄本575000B.C.‐2025A.D.大韓民國忠淸北道槐山郡曾坪邑曾坪里서울特別市 永登浦區奉天洞345番地서울特別市 永登浦區奉天洞347番地京畿道 水原市 勸善區 勸善洞서울特別市 銅雀區 舍堂路262 사당동(舍堂洞)1001-17호 304호 리빙캐슬원룸텔서울特別市 龍山區 靑坡路四七가길19-17(청파동3가)안시성 전투安市城 戰鬪우측목right sideneckthroatgullethead右側咽喉噲嗌嗓㗋嚨喖哙㗇肮咙喉門食氣顙吭𡃡𣣼𡁐𠽥𦞈𦞕𠺠𠾰𦝪𠰸𡲙𠼙㖶胭臙颃𠰉頏䑍脰齸亢㰺喉舌頸颈頚𩒤우측입右側口吻喙緌㗃肳𠙵𠮚咡㖧噭呅叭咼㚗喗𠲰𩔆𠱜凵喎啃𡁋囕㗪叼磭㗂呙㖞咁𣄮䙹㱉㗼𠶴𠹦䶠䶢㖟嘺哚𤿐𡆟𠪒𠳊髥𡄵琀舌戾翟吐咊听噳吧歍叽馕噆饢嘰우측턱右側頤顎頷颐頥頜㖤颔顄圅颌顊䫷颚䪶𦣝𩠡𦣞𩔞𦜆𩠛𩩂𩔓𩩊𩑪𩒫𩠢𦛜頙䏭䨨齕頉龁𪗟䪺顉頦颏䪹𦞞𦝣을지문덕(乙支文德, ?~?)고려 태조양만춘(楊萬春, ?~?)임경업林慶業이건희李健熙삼성 제2대 총수항우項羽초 장왕중국공산당 중앙정치국 상무위원회정치국 상무위원에든버러 공작 필립 공헤르만 빌헬름 괴링이재용李在鎔삼성그룹 제3대 총수당 현종 이융기구에르세리온가귀네드가마스라발가호엔촐레른지크마링겐가하인츠 빌헬름 구데리안조동봉위만하인리히 루이트폴트 힘러아틀라스박종성미마쓰증평공립국민학교칠천량 해전(漆川梁海戰) 또는 칠천 해전혁거세 거서간赫居世 居西干현생우주원신체現生宇宙源身體호엔촐레른지크마링겐가구에르세리온가구르세런보티건귀네드가디네부르가마스라발가웨일스 공(잉글랜드 왕세자)이영애(李英愛, 1971년 1월 31일~)입자 물리학의 입자기본 입자페르미온쿼크위(u)아래(d)맵시(c)기묘(s)꼭대기(t)바닥(b)렙톤전자(e−)/양전자(e+)뮤온(μ−/μ+)타우 입자(τ−/τ+)중성미자 전자 중성미자/전자 반중성미자뮤온 중성미자/뮤온 반중성미자타우 중성미자/타우 반중성미자보손게이지 보손 (광자W · Z보손글루온)스칼라 보손(힉스 보손)미관측 입자대통일 이론 등액시온(A0)마요론(J)X · Y보손W' · Z' 보손비활성 중성미자자기 홀극테크니컬러 관련 입자초대칭짝게이지노글루이노중력미자 (골드스티노)뉴트랄리노 (포티노힉시노지노)차지노 (위노힉시노)색시온액시노스페르미온스쿼크 (스칼라 위 쿼크, 스칼라 아래 쿼크, 스칼라 맵시 쿼크, 스칼라 기묘 쿼크, 스칼라 꼭대기 쿼크, 스칼라 바닥 쿼크)슬렙톤 (스엘렉트론, 스뮤온, 스타우온, 스뉴트리노, 스뮤온 스뉴트리노, 스타우 스뉴트리노)양자 중력 및 끈 이론중력자딜라톤라디온(중력스칼라)중력광자기타유령 입자골드스톤 보손타키온순간자합성 입자강입자중입자핵자(N) (양성자(p)중성자(n))Δ(델타)Λ(람다)Σ(시그마)Ξ(크시)Ω(오메가)맛깔없는 가벼운 중간자π(파이온)ρ(로)η(에타)·η′(에타 프라임)φ(피)ω(오메가)a(에이)b(비)f(에프)·f′(에프 프라임)h(에이치)·h′(에이치 프라임)맛깔없는 무거운 중간자J/ψ(제이/프시)ϒ(입실론)θ(세타)χ(키)ηc/b/t(에타 쿼코늄)hc/b/t맛깔있는 중간자K(케이온)DBT기타원자핵원자분자별난 원자 오늄포지트로늄뮤오늄 등펜타쿼크미관측 입자테트라쿼크글루볼중간자 분자준입자솔리톤엑시톤마그논포논플라스몬폴라리톤폴라론로톤목록기타 가설 입자무의식초자아트라우마방어기제정신분석게슈탈트 붕괴고전적 조건형성조작적 조건형성인지부조화바넘 효과심리 검사성격 검사초두효과설단 현상칵테일 파티 효과전경-배경 이론깨진 유리창 이론정보처리이론루시퍼 이펙트스탠퍼드 감옥 실험편안한 복제인간 증후군원인론목적론해석 수준 이론심리치료인문학재난심리학(disaster psychology)군사심리학(영어판)군중심리학자살 예방환경심리학깨진 유리창 이론범죄예방 환경설계심리역사학(영어판)로이드 드마우스(영어판)의상심리학(clothing psychology)의사소통(휴먼 커뮤니케이션)대인간 커뮤니케이션(영어판)잔소리 (심리)(영어판)편집성 인격 장애폭력 / 가정폭력아동학대 / 동물학대힐가드와 애트킨슨의 심리학 원론(Atkinson & Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology)볼더 모델찰스 다윈심리학역사심리학자연구 분야감정생물심리학임상심리학인지심리학인지 신경과학비교심리학비판심리학문화심리학발달심리학진화심리학실험심리학개인심리학해방심리학수리심리학매체심리학약물심리학신경심리학수행심리학성격심리학생리심리학정치심리학긍정심리학심리언어학정신병리학정신물리학심리생리학정성적 심리 연구정량적 심리 연구사회심리학이론심리학교육심리학군중심리학스포츠심리학프시응용 분야심리 실험임상심리학상담심리학교육심리학법정심리학건강심리학산업 및 조직 심리학법심리학산업 건강심리학관계심리학학교심리학스포츠심리학음향심리학체제심리학심리철학시각심리학접근 방법분석심리학행동주의인지주의인지 행동 치료기술심리학실존주의 상담가족 치료인지 정서 행동 치료여성주의 상담게슈탈트 치료인본주의심리학초심리학이야기 치료정신분석학정신 역동 치료초개인심리학주요 심리학자버러스 프레더릭 스키너장 피아제지그문트 프로이트오토 랑크멜라니 클라인앨버트 반두라레온 페스팅거로이 샤퍼칼 로저스스탠리 샤흐터닐 엘가 밀러에드워드 손다이크에이브러햄 매슬로고던 올포트에릭 에릭슨한스 아이젠크윌프레드 비용윌리엄 제임스데이비드 맥클랜드앨버트 엘리스아론 벡레이몬드 캐텔존 B. 왓슨쿠르트 르빈도널드 올딩 헤브조지 밀러클라크 헐제롬 케이건카를 융이반 파블로프앙드레 그린알프레트 아들러사회과학주류경제학 거시경제학미시경제학계량경제학수리경제학법학 공법학사법학법계학법제사학판례학사학 경제사학군사사학문화사학사회사학세계사학정치사학역사보조학사회학 농촌사회학도시사회학범죄학인구통계학인터넷사회학언어학 기호학인류학 고고학문화인류학사회인류학체질인류학정치학 국제관계학비교정치학정치철학공공정책학지리학 기술지리학인문지리학자연지리학환경지리학응용개발학경영학군 경영학행정학계획학군 토지이용계획연구지역계획연구도시계획연구공중보건학과학기술학과학철학군 경제철학사회과학철학심리철학역사철학교육학기술사학과학학군 과학사학양자과학학사회복지학상업학언론정보학역사사회학인간동물학인지과학인류생태학정보과학정치경제학정치사회학정치생태학젠더학지역과학지역학환경학군 환경사회과학환경연구문화연구미디어연구세계화연구식품연구지역연구채식연구해부학뼈대뼈몸통뼈대 머리뼈척추가슴우리팔다리뼈대 팔뼈대다리뼈대골수연골유리연골섬유연골탄력연골관절섬유관절연골관절윤활관절근육계골격근민무늬근심장근내분비계뇌하수체시상하부솔방울샘갑상샘부갑상샘가슴샘부신이자정소난소순환계심혈관계심장혈관 동맥정맥모세혈관대동맥대정맥폐동맥폐정맥혈액 혈장적혈구백혈구혈소판림프계림프관림프절비장가슴샘편도파이어판점막관련림프조직비뇨계콩팥요관방광요도생식계남성고환부고환정관정삭요도정낭전립샘망울요도샘음낭음경귀두포피여성난소자궁관자궁질질입구주름음문대음순소음순젖샘소화계소화관입인두식도위작은창자 샘창자공장회장큰창자 맹장결장곧은창자항문소화샘침샘이자쓸개간신경계중추신경계 뇌척수말초신경계 몸신경계자율신경계 교감신경계부교감신경계눈귀코혀피부계피부모낭땀샘피지샘손발톱유방호흡계비강인두후두기관기관지허파외분비계땀샘망울요도샘스킨샘젖샘전립샘전미골부샘점액정낭침샘코딱지큰질어귀샘생물학의 주요 분야생물학의 분야계생명학고생물학고유전학균학기생충학동물학면역학미생물학발생생물학 (발생학)병리학보전생물학분류학분자생물학분자세포유전학생리학생물리학생물정보학생물통계학생태학생화학세포생물학세포유전학수리생물학시간생물학식물학신경과학약리학역학우주생물학유전체학유전학위생학인간생물학조직학진화생물학해부학해양생물학생물학의 가설들자연발생설Personality disorder classificationGeneral classificationsDimensionalCategoricalMulti-axialPrototypalRelationalStructuralICD classifications (ICD-10)SchizotypalSchizotypalSpecificAnankastic personality disorderAnxious (avoidant)DependentDissocialEmotionallyunstableHistrionicParanoidSchizoidOtherEccentricHaltloseImmatureNarcissisticPassive–aggressivePsychoneuroticOrganicOrganicUnspecifiedUnspecifiedDSM classificationsDSM-III-R onlySadisticSelf-defeating (masochistic)DSM-IV onlyPersonality disorder not otherwise specifiedAppendix B (proposed)DepressiveNegativistic (passive–aggressive)DSM-5Cluster A (odd)ParanoidSchizoidSchizotypalCluster B (dramatic)AntisocialBorderlineHistrionicNarcissisticCluster C (anxious)AvoidantDependentObsessive-compulsiveOtherOther specifiedUnspecifiedAlternative DSM-5 Modelfor Personality DisordersSpecificAntisocialAvoidantBorderlineNarcissisticObsessive-compulsiveSchizotypalGeneralTrait SpecifiedvteMental disorders (Classification)Adult personality and behaviorChildhood and learningMood (affective)Neurological and symptomaticNeurotic, stress-related and somatoformPhysiological and physical behaviorPsychoactive substances, substance abuse and substance-relatedSchizophrenia, schizotypal and delusionalSymptoms and uncategorized시시비비 是是非非right and[or] wrong불문곡직without inquiring into the right or wrong敗輪敗tolose(agame)tobedefeatedtofailsuccessorfailuretodefeattotarnishtoruintodestroytosquanderafamilyfortunetohaveone'sreputationdestroyedtocorruptpublicmoralstowitherandfallwitheredbranchesandleavesThechrysanthemumshavewithereddilapidatedworn-outofclothingtatteredworncottonwooltorotrottentoremovetogetridof輪wheelgeartricyclecargoshipedgerimtotaketurnstoworkinshiftsIt'syourturnI'vewaitedforovertenminutesnowandit'sstillnotmyturnthisisridiculoustowaitforone'sturntoqueueforpublichousingClassifierforthesunortheroundmoonabrightmoonaredsunClassifierforroundssecondroundoftalksacycleofChinesezodiactwelveyearstogang-rape飼敎飼tofeedtoraise敎toteachtoinstructtocausetomakeetc較贖較tocomparetocompetecomparativelyrelativelyratherbetterthanintroducestheobjectofcomparisonMy salaryismorethanmyparentsobviousclearmoreevenmorenomatterhow贖toredeemtoransomwashingawayyoursinclearingyourdebtbyofferingmoneywealthoreffort源本來體源等級體630128-1067814朴鐘權現在體現在流體now體past體present體current體up to now體Self-knowledge(psychology)Self-imageSelf-conceptSelf-schemaPersonalityTheoriesNeural basis of selfSelf-categorization theoryProcessesSelf-perception theorySelf-awarenessSelf-reflectionSelf-consciousnessValue judgmentSelf-esteemTrue self and false selfAs applied to activitiesSelf-assessmentSelf-efficacyInterpersonalSelf-disclosureSelf-concealmentSocialPersonal identity (philosophy)Identity (social science)Collective identitySocial identity theoryIn-group and out-groupSocial identity threatPoliticsIdentity politics / Respectability politicsPolitical identityRight to personal identity反獸獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血智獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血性獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數口品血人獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血精獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血忄青獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血道獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血道獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血智獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血面獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血忄青獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血位獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血格獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數