A mental disorder, also referred to as a mental illness,[6] a mental health condition,[7] or a psychiatric disability,[2] is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning.[8] A mental disorder is also characterized by a clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior, often in a social context.[9][10] Such disturbances may occur as single episodes, may be persistent, or may be relapsing–remitting. There are many different types of mental disorders, with signs and symptoms that vary widely between specific disorders.[10][11] A mental disorder is one aspect of mental health. The causes of mental disorders are often unclear. Theories incorporate findings from a range of fields. Disorders may be associated with particular regions or functions of the brain. Disorders are usually diagnosed or assessed by a mental health professional, such as a clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, psychiatric nurse, or clinical social worker, using various methods such as psychometric tests, but often relying on observation and questioning. Cultural and religious beliefs, as well as social norms, should be taken into account when making a diagnosis.[12] Services for mental disorders are usually based in psychiatric hospitals, outpatient clinics, or in the community (in the United Kingdom). Treatments are provided by mental health professionals. Common treatment options are psychotherapy or psychiatric medication, while lifestyle changes, social interventions, peer support, and self-help are also options. In a minority of cases, there may be involuntary detention or treatment. Prevention programs have been shown to reduce depression.[10][13] In 2019, common mental disorders around the globe include: major depression, which affects about 264 million people; dementia, which affects about 50 million; bipolar disorder, which affects about 45 million; and schizophrenia and other psychoses, which affect about 20 million people.[10] Neurodevelopmental disorders include attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (autism), and intellectual disability, of which onset occurs early in the developmental period.[14][10] Stigma and discrimination can add to the suffering and disability associated with mental disorders, leading to various social movements attempting to increase understanding and challenge social exclusion. Definition "Nervous breakdown" redirects here. For other uses, see Nervous breakdown (disambiguation). The definition and classification of mental disorders are key issues for researchers as well as service providers and those who may be diagnosed. For a mental state to be classified as a disorder, it generally needs to cause dysfunction.[15] Most international clinical documents use the term mental "disorder", while "illness" is also common. It has been noted that using the term "mental" (i.e., of the mind) is not necessarily meant to imply separateness from the brain or body. According to the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), published in 1994, a mental disorder is a psychological syndrome or pattern that is associated with distress (e.g., via a painful symptom), disability (impairment in one or more important areas of functioning), increased risk of death, or causes a significant loss of autonomy; however, it excludes normal responses such as the grief from loss of a loved one and also excludes deviant behavior for political, religious, or societal reasons not arising from a dysfunction in the individual.[16] The DSM-IV definition states that, like many medical terms, mental disorder "lacks a consistent operational definition that covers all situations". It notes that different levels of abstraction can be used for medical definitions, including pathology, symptomology, deviance from a normal range, or etiology, and that the same is true for mental disorders, so that sometimes one type of definition is appropriate and sometimes another, depending on the situation.[17] In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) redefined mental disorders in the DSM-5 as "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning."[18] The final draft of ICD-11 contains a very similar definition.[19] The terms "mental breakdown" or "nervous breakdown" may be used by the general population to mean a mental disorder.[20] The terms "nervous breakdown" and "mental breakdown" have not been formally defined through a medical diagnostic system such as the DSM-5 or ICD-10 and are nearly absent from scientific literature regarding mental illness.[21][22] Although "nervous breakdown" is not rigorously defined, surveys of laypersons suggest that the term refers to a specific acute time-limited reactive disorder involving symptoms such as anxiety or depression, usually precipitated by external stressors.[21] Many health experts today refer to a nervous breakdown as a mental health crisis.[23] Nervous illness This article contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. Please help summarize the quotations. Consider transferring direct quotations to Wikiquote or excerpts to Wikisource. (February 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message) In addition to the concept of mental disorder, some people have argued for a return to the old-fashioned concept of nervous illness. In How Everyone Became Depressed: The Rise and Fall of the Nervous Breakdown (2013), Edward Shorter, a professor of psychiatry and the history of medicine, says: We have had nervous illness for centuries. When you are too nervous to function ... it is a nervous breakdown. But that term has vanished from medicine, although not from the way we speak.... The nervous patients of yesteryear are the depressives of today. That is the bad news.... There is a deeper illness that drives depression and the symptoms of mood. We can call this deeper illness something else, or invent a neologism, but we need to get the discussion off depression and onto this deeper disorder in the brain and body. That is the point. — Edward Shorter, the University of Toronto[24] In eliminating the nervous breakdown, psychiatry has come close to having its own nervous breakdown. — David Healy, MD, FRCPsych, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Cardiff, Wales[25] Nerves stand at the core of common mental illness, no matter how much we try to forget them. — Peter J. Tyrer, FMedSci, Professor of Community Psychiatry, Imperial College, London[26] Classifications Main article: Classification of mental disorders There are currently two widely established systems that classify mental disorders: International Classification of Diseases produced by the WHO. The latest edition is the ICD-11, which is in effect since 1 January 2022.[27] The ICD is a broad medical classification system; mental disorders are contained in Chapter 06: Mental, behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders (06). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders produced by the American Psychiatric Association since 1952. The latest edition is the Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), which was released in 2022.[28] Both of these list categories of disorder and provide standardized criteria for diagnosis. They have deliberately converged their codes in recent revisions so that the manuals are often broadly comparable, although significant differences remain. Other classification schemes may be used in non-western cultures, for example, the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders, and other manuals may be used by those of alternative theoretical persuasions, such as the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. In general, mental disorders are classified separately from neurological disorders, learning disabilities or intellectual disability. Unlike the DSM and ICD, some approaches are not based on identifying distinct categories of disorder using dichotomous symptom profiles intended to separate the abnormal from the normal. There is significant scientific debate about the relative merits of categorical versus such non-categorical (or hybrid) schemes, also known as continuum or dimensional models. A spectrum approach may incorporate elements of both. In the scientific and academic literature on the definition or classification of mental disorder, one extreme argues that it is entirely a matter of value judgements (including of what is normal) while another proposes that it is or could be entirely objective and scientific (including by reference to statistical norms).[29] Common hybrid views argue that the concept of mental disorder is objective even if only a "fuzzy prototype" that can never be precisely defined, or conversely that the concept always involves a mixture of scientific facts and subjective value judgments.[30] Although the diagnostic categories are referred to as 'disorders', they are presented as medical diseases, but are not validated in the same way as most medical diagnoses. Some neurologists argue that classification will only be reliable and valid when based on neurobiological features rather than clinical interview, while others suggest that the differing ideological and practical perspectives need to be better integrated.[31][32] The DSM and ICD approach remains under attack both because of the implied causality model[33] and because some researchers believe it better to aim at underlying brain differences which can precede symptoms by many years.[34] Dimensional models The high degree of comorbidity between disorders in categorical models such as the DSM and ICD have led some to propose dimensional models. Studying comorbidity between disorders have demonstrated two latent (unobserved) factors or dimensions in the structure of mental disorders that are thought to possibly reflect etiological processes. These two dimensions reflect a distinction between internalizing disorders, such as mood or anxiety symptoms, and externalizing disorders such as behavioral or substance use symptoms.[35] A single general factor of psychopathology, similar to the g factor for intelligence, has been empirically supported. The p factor model supports the internalizing-externalizing distinction, but also supports the formation of a third dimension of thought disorders such as schizophrenia.[36] Biological evidence also supports the validity of the internalizing-externalizing structure of mental disorders, with twin and adoption studies supporting heritable factors for externalizing and internalizing disorders.[37][38][39] A leading dimensional model is the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology. Disorders See also: List of mental disorders There are many different categories of mental disorder, and many different facets of human behavior and personality that can become disordered.[40][41][42][43] Anxiety disorders Main article: Anxiety disorder An anxiety disorder is anxiety or fear that interferes with normal functioning.[41] Commonly recognized categories include specific phobias, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Obsessive–compulsive disorder was categorized as an anxiety disorder in DSM-III, which was published in 1980, but was later placed in its own section called "Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorder" in DSM-5.[44] Mood disorders Main article: Mood disorder Other affective (emotion/mood) processes can also become disordered. Mood disorder involving unusually intense and sustained sadness, melancholia, or despair is known as major depression (also known as unipolar or clinical depression). Milder, but still prolonged depression, can be diagnosed as dysthymia. Bipolar disorder (also known as manic depression) involves abnormally "high" or pressured mood states, known as mania or hypomania, alternating with normal or depressed moods. The extent to which unipolar and bipolar mood phenomena represent distinct categories of disorder, or mix and merge along a dimension or spectrum of mood, is subject to some scientific debate.[45][46] Psychotic disorders Main article: Psychotic disorder Patterns of belief, language use and perception of reality can become dysregulated (e.g., delusions, thought disorder, hallucinations). Psychotic disorders in this domain include schizophrenia, and delusional disorder. Schizoaffective disorder is a category used for individuals showing aspects of both schizophrenia and affective disorders. Schizotypy is a category used for individuals showing some of the characteristics associated with schizophrenia, but without meeting cutoff criteria.[citation needed] Personality disorders This section is an excerpt from Personality disorder.[edit] A personality disorder (PD) is a mental disorder characterized by an enduring and pervasive maladaptive pattern of behavior, emotions, cognition, and inner experience, deviating from social norms.[47][48] As a common feature, this manifests in significant impairment in interpersonal relationships and various aspects of functioning of the self, such as self-concept,[49] in conjunction with pathological personality traits.[50] These patterns develop early, are inflexible, and are associated with significant distress or disability.[48] There are both dimensional and categorical approaches to the classification of personality disorders, with the former being implemented in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), whereas the main model in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is categorical;[48] moreover, the Alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders (AMPD) combines the two into a hybrid model.[51] In accordance with the categorical approach, personality disorders are viewed as distinct types, such as avoidant or narcissistic; on the other hand, the dimensional systems employed in the ICD-11 and AMPD rate severity and pathological traits.[51] Neurodevelopmental disorders This section is an excerpt from Neurodevelopmental disorder.[edit] Neurodevelopmental disorders are a group of mental disorders causatively related to maldevelopment of the nervous system, which includes the brain and spinal cord[citation needed]. According to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) published in 2013, these conditions generally appear in early childhood, usually before children start school, and can persist into adulthood.[52] The key characteristic of all these disorders is that they negatively impact a person's functioning in one or more domains of life (personal, social, academic, occupational) depending on the disorder and deficits it has caused. All of these disorders and their levels of impairment exist on a spectrum, and affected individuals can experience varying degrees of symptoms and deficits, despite having the same diagnosis.[52][53] Some causes can contribute to these disorders, such as genetic factors (genetics, family medical history),[54] environmental factors (excessive stress, exposure to neurotoxins, pollution, viral infections, bacterial infections),[55][56] physical factors (traumatic brain injury, illness),[57] and prenatal factors (birth defects, exposure to drugs during pregnancy, low birth weight).[58] Neurodevelopmental disorders can be managed with behavioral therapy, applied behavior analysis (ABA), educational interventions, specific medications, and other such treatments.[59] The DSM-5 classifies neurodevelopmental disorders into six overarching groups: intellectual, communication, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, motor, and specific learning disorders.[52] Often one disorder is accompanied by another.[53] Eating disorders This section is an excerpt from Eating disorder.[edit] An eating disorder (ED) is a mental disorder defined by abnormal eating behaviors that adversely affect a person's physical or mental health.[60] These behaviors may include eating too much food or too little food, as well as body image issues. Types of eating disorders include binge eating disorder, where the person suffering keeps eating large amounts in a short period of time typically while not being hungry, often leading to weight gain; anorexia nervosa, where the person has an intense fear of gaining weight, thus restricts food and/or overexercises to manage this fear; bulimia nervosa, where individuals eat a large quantity (binging) then try to rid themselves of the food (purging), in an attempt to not gain any weight; pica, where the patient eats non-food items; rumination syndrome, where the patient regurgitates undigested or minimally digested food; avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), where people have a reduced or selective food intake due to some psychological reasons; and a group of other specified feeding or eating disorders.[60] Anxiety disorders, depression and substance abuse are common among people with eating disorders.[61] These disorders do not include obesity.[60] People often experience comorbidity between an eating disorder and OCD.[62] Sleep disorders Main article: Sleep disorder Sleep disorders are associated with disruption to normal sleep patterns. A common sleep disorder is insomnia, which is described as difficulty falling and/or staying asleep. Other sleep disorders include narcolepsy, sleep apnea, REM sleep behavior disorder, chronic sleep deprivation, and restless leg syndrome. Narcolepsy is a condition of extreme tendencies to fall asleep whenever and wherever. People with narcolepsy feel refreshed after their random sleep, but eventually get sleepy again. Narcolepsy diagnosis requires an overnight stay at a sleep center for analysis, during which doctors ask for a detailed sleep history and sleep records. Doctors also use actigraphs and polysomnography.[63] Doctors will do a multiple sleep latency test, which measures how long it takes a person to fall asleep.[63] Sleep apnea, when breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, can be a serious sleep disorder. Three types of sleep apnea include obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, and complex sleep apnea.[64] Sleep apnea can be diagnosed at home or with polysomnography at a sleep center. An ear, nose, and throat doctor may further help with the sleeping habits. Sexuality related Sexual disorders include dyspareunia and various kinds of paraphilia (sexual arousal to objects, situations, or individuals that are considered abnormal or harmful to the person or others).[citation needed] Other Impulse control disorders: People who are abnormally unable to resist certain urges or impulses that could be harmful to themselves or others, may be classified as having an impulse control disorder, and disorders such as kleptomania (stealing) or pyromania (fire-setting). Various behavioral addictions, such as gambling addiction, may be classed as a disorder.[citation needed] Substance use disorders: This disorder refers to the use of drugs (legal or illegal, including alcohol) that persists despite significant problems or harm related to its use. Substance dependence and substance abuse fall under this umbrella category in the DSM. Substance use disorder may be due to a pattern of compulsive and repetitive use of a drug that results in tolerance to its effects and withdrawal symptoms when use is reduced or stopped.[citation needed] Dissociative disorders: People with severe disturbances of their self-identity, memory, and general awareness of themselves and their surroundings may be classified as having these types of disorders, including depersonalization-derealization disorder or dissociative identity disorder (which was previously referred to as multiple personality disorder or "split personality").[citation needed] Cognitive disorders: These affect cognitive abilities, including learning and memory. This category includes delirium and mild and major neurocognitive disorder (previously termed dementia).[citation needed] Somatoform disorders may be diagnosed when there are problems that appear to originate in the body that are thought to be manifestations of a mental disorder. This includes somatization disorder and conversion disorder. There are also disorders of how a person perceives their body, such as body dysmorphic disorder. Neurasthenia is an old diagnosis involving somatic complaints as well as fatigue and low spirits/depression, which is officially recognized by the ICD-10 but no longer by the DSM-IV.[65][non-primary source needed] Factitious disorders are diagnosed where symptoms are thought to be reported for personal gain. Symptoms are often deliberately produced or feigned, and may relate to either symptoms in the individual or in someone close to them, particularly people they care for.[citation needed] There are attempts to introduce a category of relational disorder, where the diagnosis is of a relationship rather than on any one individual in that relationship. The relationship may be between children and their parents, between couples, or others. There already exists, under the category of psychosis, a diagnosis of shared psychotic disorder where two or more individuals share a particular delusion because of their close relationship with each other.[citation needed] There are a number of uncommon psychiatric syndromes, which are often named after the person who first described them, such as Capgras syndrome, De Clerambault syndrome, Othello syndrome, Ganser syndrome, Cotard delusion, and Ekbom syndrome, and additional disorders such as the Couvade syndrome and Geschwind syndrome.[66] Signs and symptoms Course The onset of psychiatric disorders usually occurs from childhood to early adulthood.[67] Impulse-control disorders and a few anxiety disorders tend to appear in childhood. Some other anxiety disorders, substance disorders, and mood disorders emerge later in the mid-teens.[68] Symptoms of schizophrenia typically manifest from late adolescence to early twenties.[69] The likely course and outcome of mental disorders vary and are dependent on numerous factors related to the disorder itself, the individual as a whole, and the social environment. Some disorders may last a brief period of time, while others may be long-term in nature. All disorders can have a varied course. Long-term international studies of schizophrenia have found that over a half of individuals recover in terms of symptoms, and around a fifth to a third in terms of symptoms and functioning, with many requiring no medication. While some have serious difficulties and support needs for many years, "late" recovery is still plausible. The World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that the long-term studies' findings converged with others in "relieving patients, carers and clinicians of the chronicity paradigm which dominated thinking throughout much of the 20th century."[70][non-primary source needed][71] A follow-up study by Tohen and coworkers revealed that around half of people initially diagnosed with bipolar disorder achieve symptomatic recovery (no longer meeting criteria for the diagnosis) within six weeks, and nearly all achieve it within two years, with nearly half regaining their prior occupational and residential status in that period. Less than half go on to experience a new episode of mania or major depression within the next two years.[72][non-primary source needed] Disability Disorder Disability-adjusted life years[73] Major depressive disorder 65.5 million Alcohol-use disorder 23.7 million Schizophrenia 16.8 million Bipolar disorder 14.4 million Other drug-use disorders 8.4 million Panic disorder 7.0 million Obsessive-compulsive disorder 5.1 million Primary insomnia 3.6 million Post-traumatic stress disorder 3.5 million Some disorders may be very limited in their functional effects, while others may involve substantial disability and support needs. In this context, the terms psychiatric disability and psychological disability are sometimes used instead of mental disorder.[2][3] The degree of ability or disability may vary over time and across different life domains. Furthermore, psychiatric disability has been linked to institutionalization, discrimination and social exclusion as well as to the inherent effects of disorders. Alternatively, functioning may be affected by the stress of having to hide a condition in work or school, etc., by adverse effects of medications or other substances, or by mismatches between illness-related variations and demands for regularity.[74] It is also the case that, while often being characterized in purely negative terms, some mental traits or states labeled as psychiatric disabilities can also involve above-average creativity, non-conformity, goal-striving, meticulousness, or empathy.[75] In addition, the public perception of the level of disability associated with mental disorders can change.[76] Nevertheless, internationally, people report equal or greater disability from commonly occurring mental conditions than from commonly occurring physical conditions, particularly in their social roles and personal relationships. The proportion with access to professional help for mental disorders is far lower, however, even among those assessed as having a severe psychiatric disability.[77] Disability in this context may or may not involve such things as: Basic activities of daily living. Including looking after the self (health care, grooming, dressing, shopping, cooking etc.) or looking after accommodation (chores, DIY tasks, etc.) Interpersonal relationships. Including communication skills, ability to form relationships and sustain them, ability to leave the home or mix in crowds or particular settings Occupational functioning. Ability to acquire an employment and hold it, cognitive and social skills required for the job, dealing with workplace culture, or studying as a student. In terms of total disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is an estimate of how many years of life are lost due to premature death or to being in a state of poor health and disability, psychiatric disabilities rank amongst the most disabling conditions. Unipolar depressive disorder (also known as major depressive disorder) is the third leading cause of disability worldwide, of any condition mental or physical, accounting for 65.5 million years lost. The first systematic description of global disability arising in youth, in 2011, found that among 10- to 24-year-olds nearly half of all disability (current and as estimated to continue) was due to psychiatric disabilities, including substance use disorders and conditions involving self-harm. Second to this were accidental injuries (mainly traffic collisions) accounting for 12 percent of disability, followed by communicable diseases at 10 percent. The psychiatric disabilities associated with most disabilities in high-income countries were unipolar major depression (20%) and alcohol use disorder (11%). In the eastern Mediterranean region, it was unipolar major depression (12%) and schizophrenia (7%), and in Africa it was unipolar major depression (7%) and bipolar disorder (5%).[78] Suicide, which is often attributed to some underlying mental disorder, is a leading cause of death among teenagers and adults under 35.[79][80] There are an estimated 10 to 20 million non-fatal attempted suicides every year worldwide.[81] Risk factors Main article: Causes of mental disorders The predominant view as of 2018 is that genetic, psychological, and environmental factors all contribute to the development or progression of mental disorders.[82] Different risk factors may be present at different ages, with risk occurring as early as during prenatal period.[83] Genetics Main article: Psychiatric genetics A number of psychiatric disorders are linked to a family history (including depression, narcissistic personality disorder[84][85] and anxiety).[86] Twin studies have also revealed a very high heritability for many mental disorders (especially autism and schizophrenia).[87] Although researchers have been looking for decades for clear linkages between genetics and mental disorders, that work has not yielded specific genetic biomarkers yet that might lead to better diagnosis and better treatments.[88] Statistical research looking at eleven disorders found widespread assortative mating between people with mental illness. That means that individuals with one of these disorders were two to three times more likely than the general population to have a partner with a mental disorder. Sometimes people seemed to have preferred partners with the same mental illness. Thus, people with schizophrenia or ADHD are seven times more likely to have affected partners with the same disorder. This is even more pronounced for people with autism who are 10 times more likely to have a spouse with the same disorder.[89] Environment Main article: Brain health and pollution The prevalence of mental illness is higher in more economically unequal countries. During the prenatal stage, factors like unwanted pregnancy, lack of adaptation to pregnancy or substance use during pregnancy increases the risk of developing a mental disorder.[83] Maternal stress and birth complications including prematurity and infections have also been implicated in increasing susceptibility for mental illness.[90] Infants neglected or not provided optimal nutrition have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment.[83] Social influences have also been found to be important,[91] including abuse, neglect, bullying, social stress, traumatic events, and other negative or overwhelming life experiences. Aspects of the wider community have also been implicated,[92] including employment problems, socioeconomic inequality, lack of social cohesion, problems linked to migration, and features of particular societies and cultures. The specific risks and pathways to particular disorders are less clear, however. Nutrition also plays a role in mental disorders.[10][93] In schizophrenia and psychosis, risk factors include migration and discrimination, childhood trauma, bereavement or separation in families, recreational use of drugs,[94] and urbanicity.[92] In anxiety, risk factors may include parenting factors including parental rejection, lack of parental warmth, high hostility, harsh discipline, high maternal negative affect, anxious childrearing, modelling of dysfunctional and drug-abusing behavior, and child abuse (emotional, physical and sexual).[95] Adults with imbalance work to life are at higher risk for developing anxiety.[83] For bipolar disorder, stress (such as childhood adversity) is not a specific cause, but does place genetically and biologically vulnerable individuals at risk for a more severe course of illness.[96] Drug use Mental disorders are associated with drug use including: cannabis,[97] alcohol[98] and caffeine,[99] use of which appears to promote anxiety.[100] For psychosis and schizophrenia, usage of a number of drugs has been associated with development of the disorder, including cannabis, cocaine, and amphetamines.[101][97] There has been debate regarding the relationship between usage of cannabis and bipolar disorder.[102] Cannabis has also been associated with depression.[97] Adolescents are at increased risk for tobacco, alcohol and drug use; Peer pressure is the main reason why adolescents start using substances. At this age, the use of substances could be detrimental to the development of the brain and place them at higher risk of developing a mental disorder.[83] Chronic disease People living with chronic conditions like HIV and diabetes are at higher risk of developing a mental disorder. People living with diabetes experience significant stress from the biological impact of the disease, which places them at risk for developing anxiety and depression. Diabetic patients also have to deal with emotional stress trying to manage the disease. Conditions like heart disease, stroke, respiratory conditions, cancer, and arthritis increase the risk of developing a mental disorder when compared to the general population.[103] Personality traits Risk factors for mental illness include a propensity for high neuroticism[104][105] or "emotional instability". In anxiety, risk factors may include temperament and attitudes (e.g. pessimism).[86] Causal models Mental disorders can arise from multiple sources, and in many cases there is no single accepted or consistent cause currently established. An eclectic or pluralistic mix of models may be used to explain particular disorders.[105][106] The primary paradigm of contemporary mainstream Western psychiatry is said to be the biopsychosocial model, which incorporates biological, psychological and social factors, although this may not always be applied in practice. Biological psychiatry follows a biomedical model where many mental disorders are conceptualized as disorders of brain circuits likely caused by developmental processes shaped by a complex interplay of genetics and experience. A common assumption is that disorders may have resulted from genetic and developmental vulnerabilities, exposed by stress in life (for example in a diathesis–stress model), although there are various views on what causes differences between individuals. Some types of mental disorders may be viewed as primarily neurodevelopmental disorders.[citation needed] A distinction is sometimes made between a "medical model" or a "social model" of psychiatric disability.[107] Diagnosis Psychiatrists seek to provide a medical diagnosis of individuals by an assessment of symptoms, signs and impairment associated with particular types of mental disorder. Other mental health professionals, such as clinical psychologists, may or may not apply the same diagnostic categories to their clinical formulation of a client's difficulties and circumstances.[108] The majority of mental health problems are, at least initially, assessed and treated by family physicians (in the UK general practitioners) during consultations, who may refer a patient on for more specialist diagnosis in acute or chronic cases. Routine diagnostic practice in mental health services typically involves an interview known as a mental status examination, where evaluations are made of appearance and behavior, self-reported symptoms, mental health history, and current life circumstances. The views of other professionals, relatives, or other third parties may be taken into account. A physical examination to check for ill health or the effects of medications or other drugs may be conducted. Psychological testing is sometimes used via paper-and-pen or computerized questionnaires, which may include algorithms based on ticking off standardized diagnostic criteria, and in rare specialist cases neuroimaging tests may be requested, but such methods are more commonly found in research studies than routine clinical practice.[109][110] Time and budgetary constraints often limit practicing psychiatrists from conducting more thorough diagnostic evaluations.[111] It has been found that most clinicians evaluate patients using an unstructured, open-ended approach, with limited training in evidence-based assessment methods, and that inaccurate diagnosis may be common in routine practice.[112] In addition, comorbidity is very common in psychiatric diagnosis, where the same person meets the criteria for more than one disorder. On the other hand, a person may have several different difficulties only some of which meet the criteria for being diagnosed. There may be specific problems with accurate diagnosis in developing countries. More structured approaches are being increasingly used to measure levels of mental illness. HoNOS is the most widely used measure in English mental health services, being used by at least 61 trusts.[113] In HoNOS a score of 0–4 is given for each of 12 factors, based on functional living capacity.[114] Research has been supportive of HoNOS,[115] although some questions have been asked about whether it provides adequate coverage of the range and complexity of mental illness problems, and whether the fact that often only 3 of the 12 scales vary over time gives enough subtlety to accurately measure outcomes of treatment.[116] Criticism icon This section relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this section by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "criticism" psychiatric diagnosis – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message) Since the 1980s, Paula Caplan has been concerned about the subjectivity of psychiatric diagnosis, and people being arbitrarily "slapped with a psychiatric label." Caplan says because psychiatric diagnosis is unregulated, doctors are not required to spend much time interviewing patients or to seek a second opinion. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders can lead a psychiatrist to focus on narrow checklists of symptoms, with little consideration of what is actually causing the person's problems. So, according to Caplan, getting a psychiatric diagnosis and label often stands in the way of recovery.[117] In 2013, psychiatrist Allen Frances wrote a paper entitled "The New Crisis of Confidence in Psychiatric Diagnosis", which said that "psychiatric diagnosis... still relies exclusively on fallible subjective judgments rather than objective biological tests." Frances was also concerned about "unpredictable overdiagnosis."[118] For many years, marginalized psychiatrists (such as Peter Breggin, Thomas Szasz) and outside critics (such as Stuart A. Kirk) have "been accusing psychiatry of engaging in the systematic medicalization of normality." More recently these concerns have come from insiders who have worked for and promoted the American Psychiatric Association (e.g., Robert Spitzer, Allen Frances).[119] A 2002 editorial in the British Medical Journal warned of inappropriate medicalization leading to disease mongering, where the boundaries of the definition of illnesses are expanded to include personal problems as medical problems or risks of diseases are emphasized to broaden the market for medications.[120] Gary Greenberg, a psychoanalyst, in his book "the Book of Woe", argues that mental illness is really about suffering and how the DSM creates diagnostic labels to categorize people's suffering.[121] Indeed, the psychiatrist Thomas Szasz, in his book "the Medicalization of Everyday Life", also argues that what is psychiatric illness, is not always biological in nature (i.e. social problems, poverty, etc.), and may even be a part of the human condition.[122] Potential routine use of MRI/fMRI in diagnosis in 2018 the American Psychological Association commissioned a review to reach a consensus on whether modern clinical MRI/fMRI will be able to be used in the diagnosis of mental health disorders. The criteria presented by the APA stated that the biomarkers used in diagnosis should: "have a sensitivity of at least 80% for detecting a particular psychiatric disorder" should "have a specificity of at least 80% for distinguishing this disorder from other psychiatric or medical disorders" "should be reliable, reproducible, and ideally be noninvasive, simple to perform, and inexpensive" proposed biomarkers should be verified by 2 independent studies each by a different investigator and different population samples and published in a peer-reviewed journal. The review concluded that although neuroimaging diagnosis may technically be feasible, very large studies are needed to evaluate specific biomarkers which were not available.[123] Prevention Main article: Prevention of mental disorders The 2004 WHO report "Prevention of Mental Disorders" stated that "Prevention of these disorders is obviously one of the most effective ways to reduce the [disease] burden."[124] The 2011 European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on prevention of mental disorders states "There is considerable evidence that various psychiatric conditions can be prevented through the implementation of effective evidence-based interventions."[125] A 2011 UK Department of Health report on the economic case for mental health promotion and mental illness prevention found that "many interventions are outstandingly good value for money, low in cost and often become self-financing over time, saving public expenditure".[126] In 2016, the National Institute of Mental Health re-affirmed prevention as a research priority area.[127] Parenting may affect the child's mental health, and evidence suggests that helping parents to be more effective with their children can address mental health needs.[128][129][130] Universal prevention (aimed at a population that has no increased risk for developing a mental disorder, such as school programs or mass media campaigns) need very high numbers of people to show effect (sometimes known as the "power" problem). Approaches to overcome this are (1) focus on high-incidence groups (e.g. by targeting groups with high risk factors), (2) use multiple interventions to achieve greater, and thus more statistically valid, effects, (3) use cumulative meta-analyses of many trials, and (4) run very large trials.[131][132] Management Main articles: Treatment of mental disorders, Services for mental disorders, and Mental health professional The "Haus Tornow am See" (former manor house) in Germany from 1912 is today separated into a special education school and a hotel with integrated work/job- and rehabilitation-training for people with mental disorders. Treatment and support for mental disorders are provided in psychiatric hospitals, clinics or a range of community mental health services. In some countries services are increasingly based on a recovery approach, intended to support individuals' personal journey to gain the kind of life they want. There is a range of different types of treatment and what is most suitable depends on the disorder and the individual. Many things have been found to help at least some people, and a placebo effect may play a role in any intervention or medication. In a minority of cases, individuals may be treated against their will, which can cause particular difficulties depending on how it is carried out and perceived. Compulsory treatment while in the community versus non-compulsory treatment does not appear to make much of a difference except by maybe decreasing victimization.[133] Lifestyle Lifestyle strategies, including dietary changes, exercise and quitting smoking may be of benefit.[13][93][134] Therapy There is also a wide range of psychotherapists (including family therapists), counselors, and public health professionals. In addition, there are peer support roles where personal experience of similar issues is the primary source of expertise.[135][136][137][138] A major option for many mental disorders is psychotherapy. There are several main types. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely used and is based on modifying the patterns of thought and behavior associated with a particular disorder. Other psychotherapies include dialectic behavioral therapy (DBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). Psychoanalysis, addressing underlying psychic conflicts and defenses, has been a dominant school of psychotherapy and is still in use. Systemic therapy or family therapy is sometimes used, addressing a network of significant others as well as an individual. Some psychotherapies are based on a humanistic approach. There are many specific therapies used for particular disorders, which may be offshoots or hybrids of the above types. Mental health professionals often employ an eclectic or integrative approach. Much may depend on the therapeutic relationship, and there may be problems with trust, confidentiality and engagement. Medication

 A mental disorder, also referred to as a mental illness,[6] a mental health condition,[7] or a psychiatric disability,[2] is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning.[8] A mental disorder is also characterized by a clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior, often in a social context.[9][10] Such disturbances may occur as single episodes, may be persistent, or may be relapsing–remitting. There are many different types of mental disorders, with signs and symptoms that vary widely between specific disorders.[10][11] A mental disorder is one aspect of mental health.

The causes of mental disorders are often unclear. Theories incorporate findings from a range of fields. Disorders may be associated with particular regions or functions of the brain. Disorders are usually diagnosed or assessed by a mental health professional, such as a clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, psychiatric nurse, or clinical social worker, using various methods such as psychometric tests, but often relying on observation and questioning. Cultural and religious beliefs, as well as social norms, should be taken into account when making a diagnosis.[12]

Services for mental disorders are usually based in psychiatric hospitals, outpatient clinics, or in the community (in the United Kingdom). Treatments are provided by mental health professionals. Common treatment options are psychotherapy or psychiatric medication, while lifestyle changes, social interventions, peer support, and self-help are also options. In a minority of cases, there may be involuntary detention or treatment. Prevention programs have been shown to reduce depression.[10][13]

In 2019, common mental disorders around the globe include: major depression, which affects about 264 million people; dementia, which affects about 50 million; bipolar disorder, which affects about 45 million; and schizophrenia and other psychoses, which affect about 20 million people.[10] Neurodevelopmental disorders include attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (autism), and intellectual disability, of which onset occurs early in the developmental period.[14][10] Stigma and discrimination can add to the suffering and disability associated with mental disorders, leading to various social movements attempting to increase understanding and challenge social exclusion.

Definition

The definition and classification of mental disorders are key issues for researchers as well as service providers and those who may be diagnosed. For a mental state to be classified as a disorder, it generally needs to cause dysfunction.[15] Most international clinical documents use the term mental "disorder", while "illness" is also common. It has been noted that using the term "mental" (i.e., of the mind) is not necessarily meant to imply separateness from the brain or body.

According to the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), published in 1994, a mental disorder is a psychological syndrome or pattern that is associated with distress (e.g., via a painful symptom), disability (impairment in one or more important areas of functioning), increased risk of death, or causes a significant loss of autonomy; however, it excludes normal responses such as the grief from loss of a loved one and also excludes deviant behavior for political, religious, or societal reasons not arising from a dysfunction in the individual.[16]

The DSM-IV definition states that, like many medical terms, mental disorder "lacks a consistent operational definition that covers all situations". It notes that different levels of abstraction can be used for medical definitions, including pathology, symptomology, deviance from a normal range, or etiology, and that the same is true for mental disorders, so that sometimes one type of definition is appropriate and sometimes another, depending on the situation.[17]

In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) redefined mental disorders in the DSM-5 as "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning."[18] The final draft of ICD-11 contains a very similar definition.[19]

The terms "mental breakdown" or "nervous breakdown" may be used by the general population to mean a mental disorder.[20] The terms "nervous breakdown" and "mental breakdown" have not been formally defined through a medical diagnostic system such as the DSM-5 or ICD-10 and are nearly absent from scientific literature regarding mental illness.[21][22] Although "nervous breakdown" is not rigorously defined, surveys of laypersons suggest that the term refers to a specific acute time-limited reactive disorder involving symptoms such as anxiety or depression, usually precipitated by external stressors.[21] Many health experts today refer to a nervous breakdown as a mental health crisis.[23]

Nervous illness

In addition to the concept of mental disorder, some people have argued for a return to the old-fashioned concept of nervous illness. In How Everyone Became Depressed: The Rise and Fall of the Nervous Breakdown (2013), Edward Shorter, a professor of psychiatry and the history of medicine, says:

We have had nervous illness for centuries. When you are too nervous to function ... it is a nervous breakdown. But that term has vanished from medicine, although not from the way we speak.... The nervous patients of yesteryear are the depressives of today. That is the bad news.... There is a deeper illness that drives depression and the symptoms of mood. We can call this deeper illness something else, or invent a neologism, but we need to get the discussion off depression and onto this deeper disorder in the brain and body. That is the point.

— Edward Shorter, the University of Toronto[24]

In eliminating the nervous breakdown, psychiatry has come close to having its own nervous breakdown.

— David Healy, MD, FRCPsych, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Cardiff, Wales[25]

Nerves stand at the core of common mental illness, no matter how much we try to forget them.

— Peter J. Tyrer, FMedSci, Professor of Community Psychiatry, Imperial College, London[26]

Classifications

There are currently two widely established systems that classify mental disorders:

Both of these list categories of disorder and provide standardized criteria for diagnosis. They have deliberately converged their codes in recent revisions so that the manuals are often broadly comparable, although significant differences remain. Other classification schemes may be used in non-western cultures, for example, the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders, and other manuals may be used by those of alternative theoretical persuasions, such as the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. In general, mental disorders are classified separately from neurological disorders, learning disabilities or intellectual disability.

Unlike the DSM and ICD, some approaches are not based on identifying distinct categories of disorder using dichotomous symptom profiles intended to separate the abnormal from the normal. There is significant scientific debate about the relative merits of categorical versus such non-categorical (or hybrid) schemes, also known as continuum or dimensional models. A spectrum approach may incorporate elements of both.

In the scientific and academic literature on the definition or classification of mental disorder, one extreme argues that it is entirely a matter of value judgements (including of what is normal) while another proposes that it is or could be entirely objective and scientific (including by reference to statistical norms).[29] Common hybrid views argue that the concept of mental disorder is objective even if only a "fuzzy prototype" that can never be precisely defined, or conversely that the concept always involves a mixture of scientific facts and subjective value judgments.[30] Although the diagnostic categories are referred to as 'disorders', they are presented as medical diseases, but are not validated in the same way as most medical diagnoses. Some neurologists argue that classification will only be reliable and valid when based on neurobiological features rather than clinical interview, while others suggest that the differing ideological and practical perspectives need to be better integrated.[31][32]

The DSM and ICD approach remains under attack both because of the implied causality model[33] and because some researchers believe it better to aim at underlying brain differences which can precede symptoms by many years.[34]

Dimensional models

The high degree of comorbidity between disorders in categorical models such as the DSM and ICD have led some to propose dimensional models. Studying comorbidity between disorders have demonstrated two latent (unobserved) factors or dimensions in the structure of mental disorders that are thought to possibly reflect etiological processes. These two dimensions reflect a distinction between internalizing disorders, such as mood or anxiety symptoms, and externalizing disorders such as behavioral or substance use symptoms.[35] A single general factor of psychopathology, similar to the g factor for intelligence, has been empirically supported. The p factor model supports the internalizing-externalizing distinction, but also supports the formation of a third dimension of thought disorders such as schizophrenia.[36] Biological evidence also supports the validity of the internalizing-externalizing structure of mental disorders, with twin and adoption studies supporting heritable factors for externalizing and internalizing disorders.[37][38][39] A leading dimensional model is the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology.

Disorders

There are many different categories of mental disorder, and many different facets of human behavior and personality that can become disordered.[40][41][42][43]

Anxiety disorders

An anxiety disorder is anxiety or fear that interferes with normal functioning.[41] Commonly recognized categories include specific phobias, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Obsessive–compulsive disorder was categorized as an anxiety disorder in DSM-III, which was published in 1980, but was later placed in its own section called "Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorder" in DSM-5.[44]

Mood disorders

Other affective (emotion/mood) processes can also become disordered. Mood disorder involving unusually intense and sustained sadness, melancholia, or despair is known as major depression (also known as unipolar or clinical depression). Milder, but still prolonged depression, can be diagnosed as dysthymia. Bipolar disorder (also known as manic depression) involves abnormally "high" or pressured mood states, known as mania or hypomania, alternating with normal or depressed moods. The extent to which unipolar and bipolar mood phenomena represent distinct categories of disorder, or mix and merge along a dimension or spectrum of mood, is subject to some scientific debate.[45][46]

Psychotic disorders

Patterns of belief, language use and perception of reality can become dysregulated (e.g., delusions, thought disorder, hallucinations). Psychotic disorders in this domain include schizophrenia, and delusional disorder. Schizoaffective disorder is a category used for individuals showing aspects of both schizophrenia and affective disorders. Schizotypy is a category used for individuals showing some of the characteristics associated with schizophrenia, but without meeting cutoff criteria.[citation needed]

Personality disorders

A personality disorder (PD) is a mental disorder characterized by an enduring and pervasive maladaptive pattern of behavior, emotions, cognition, and inner experience, deviating from social norms.[47][48] As a common feature, this manifests in significant impairment in interpersonal relationships and various aspects of functioning of the self, such as self-concept,[49] in conjunction with pathological personality traits.[50] These patterns develop early, are inflexible, and are associated with significant distress or disability.[48]

There are both dimensional and categorical approaches to the classification of personality disorders, with the former being implemented in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), whereas the main model in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is categorical;[48] moreover, the Alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders (AMPD) combines the two into a hybrid model.[51] In accordance with the categorical approach, personality disorders are viewed as distinct types, such as avoidant or narcissistic; on the other hand, the dimensional systems employed in the ICD-11 and AMPD rate severity and pathological traits.[51]

Neurodevelopmental disorders

Neurodevelopmental disorders are a group of mental disorders causatively related to maldevelopment of the nervous system, which includes the brain and spinal cord[citation needed]. According to the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) published in 2013, these conditions generally appear in early childhood, usually before children start school, and can persist into adulthood.[52] The key characteristic of all these disorders is that they negatively impact a person's functioning in one or more domains of life (personal, social, academic, occupational) depending on the disorder and deficits it has caused. All of these disorders and their levels of impairment exist on a spectrum, and affected individuals can experience varying degrees of symptoms and deficits, despite having the same diagnosis.[52][53]

Some causes can contribute to these disorders, such as genetic factors (genetics, family medical history),[54] environmental factors (excessive stress, exposure to neurotoxins, pollution, viral infections, bacterial infections),[55][56] physical factors (traumatic brain injury, illness),[57] and prenatal factors (birth defects, exposure to drugs during pregnancy, low birth weight).[58] Neurodevelopmental disorders can be managed with behavioral therapy, applied behavior analysis (ABA), educational interventions, specific medications, and other such treatments.[59]

The DSM-5 classifies neurodevelopmental disorders into six overarching groups: intellectual, communication, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, motor, and specific learning disorders.[52] Often one disorder is accompanied by another.[53]

Eating disorders

An eating disorder (ED) is a mental disorder defined by abnormal eating behaviors that adversely affect a person's physical or mental health.[60] These behaviors may include eating too much food or too little food, as well as body image issues. Types of eating disorders include binge eating disorder, where the person suffering keeps eating large amounts in a short period of time typically while not being hungry, often leading to weight gain; anorexia nervosa, where the person has an intense fear of gaining weight, thus restricts food and/or overexercises to manage this fear; bulimia nervosa, where individuals eat a large quantity (binging) then try to rid themselves of the food (purging), in an attempt to not gain any weight; pica, where the patient eats non-food items; rumination syndrome, where the patient regurgitates undigested or minimally digested food; avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), where people have a reduced or selective food intake due to some psychological reasons; and a group of other specified feeding or eating disorders.[60] Anxiety disorders, depression and substance abuse are common among people with eating disorders.[61] These disorders do not include obesity.[60] People often experience comorbidity between an eating disorder and OCD.[62]

Sleep disorders

Sleep disorders are associated with disruption to normal sleep patterns. A common sleep disorder is insomnia, which is described as difficulty falling and/or staying asleep. Other sleep disorders include narcolepsy, sleep apnea, REM sleep behavior disorder, chronic sleep deprivation, and restless leg syndrome.

Narcolepsy is a condition of extreme tendencies to fall asleep whenever and wherever. People with narcolepsy feel refreshed after their random sleep, but eventually get sleepy again. Narcolepsy diagnosis requires an overnight stay at a sleep center for analysis, during which doctors ask for a detailed sleep history and sleep records. Doctors also use actigraphs and polysomnography.[63] Doctors will do a multiple sleep latency test, which measures how long it takes a person to fall asleep.[63]

Sleep apnea, when breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep, can be a serious sleep disorder. Three types of sleep apnea include obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, and complex sleep apnea.[64] Sleep apnea can be diagnosed at home or with polysomnography at a sleep center. An ear, nose, and throat doctor may further help with the sleeping habits.

Sexual disorders include dyspareunia and various kinds of paraphilia (sexual arousal to objects, situations, or individuals that are considered abnormal or harmful to the person or others).[citation needed]

Other

Impulse control disorders: People who are abnormally unable to resist certain urges or impulses that could be harmful to themselves or others, may be classified as having an impulse control disorder, and disorders such as kleptomania (stealing) or pyromania (fire-setting). Various behavioral addictions, such as gambling addiction, may be classed as a disorder.[citation needed]

Substance use disorders: This disorder refers to the use of drugs (legal or illegal, including alcohol) that persists despite significant problems or harm related to its use. Substance dependence and substance abuse fall under this umbrella category in the DSM. Substance use disorder may be due to a pattern of compulsive and repetitive use of a drug that results in tolerance to its effects and withdrawal symptoms when use is reduced or stopped.[citation needed]

Dissociative disorders: People with severe disturbances of their self-identity, memory, and general awareness of themselves and their surroundings may be classified as having these types of disorders, including depersonalization-derealization disorder or dissociative identity disorder (which was previously referred to as multiple personality disorder or "split personality").[citation needed]

Cognitive disorders: These affect cognitive abilities, including learning and memory. This category includes delirium and mild and major neurocognitive disorder (previously termed dementia).[citation needed]

Somatoform disorders may be diagnosed when there are problems that appear to originate in the body that are thought to be manifestations of a mental disorder. This includes somatization disorder and conversion disorder. There are also disorders of how a person perceives their body, such as body dysmorphic disorder. Neurasthenia is an old diagnosis involving somatic complaints as well as fatigue and low spirits/depression, which is officially recognized by the ICD-10 but no longer by the DSM-IV.[65][non-primary source needed]

Factitious disorders are diagnosed where symptoms are thought to be reported for personal gain. Symptoms are often deliberately produced or feigned, and may relate to either symptoms in the individual or in someone close to them, particularly people they care for.[citation needed]

There are attempts to introduce a category of relational disorder, where the diagnosis is of a relationship rather than on any one individual in that relationship. The relationship may be between children and their parents, between couples, or others. There already exists, under the category of psychosis, a diagnosis of shared psychotic disorder where two or more individuals share a particular delusion because of their close relationship with each other.[citation needed]

There are a number of uncommon psychiatric syndromes, which are often named after the person who first described them, such as Capgras syndrome, De Clerambault syndrome, Othello syndrome, Ganser syndrome, Cotard delusion, and Ekbom syndrome, and additional disorders such as the Couvade syndrome and Geschwind syndrome.[66]

Signs and symptoms

Course

The onset of psychiatric disorders usually occurs from childhood to early adulthood.[67] Impulse-control disorders and a few anxiety disorders tend to appear in childhood. Some other anxiety disorders, substance disorders, and mood disorders emerge later in the mid-teens.[68] Symptoms of schizophrenia typically manifest from late adolescence to early twenties.[69]

The likely course and outcome of mental disorders vary and are dependent on numerous factors related to the disorder itself, the individual as a whole, and the social environment. Some disorders may last a brief period of time, while others may be long-term in nature.

All disorders can have a varied course. Long-term international studies of schizophrenia have found that over a half of individuals recover in terms of symptoms, and around a fifth to a third in terms of symptoms and functioning, with many requiring no medication. While some have serious difficulties and support needs for many years, "late" recovery is still plausible. The World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that the long-term studies' findings converged with others in "relieving patients, carers and clinicians of the chronicity paradigm which dominated thinking throughout much of the 20th century."[70][non-primary source needed][71]

A follow-up study by Tohen and coworkers revealed that around half of people initially diagnosed with bipolar disorder achieve symptomatic recovery (no longer meeting criteria for the diagnosis) within six weeks, and nearly all achieve it within two years, with nearly half regaining their prior occupational and residential status in that period. Less than half go on to experience a new episode of mania or major depression within the next two years.[72][non-primary source needed]

Disability

DisorderDisability-adjusted life years[73]
Major depressive disorder65.5 million
Alcohol-use disorder23.7 million
Schizophrenia16.8 million
Bipolar disorder14.4 million
Other drug-use disorders8.4 million
Panic disorder7.0 million
Obsessive-compulsive disorder5.1 million
Primary insomnia3.6 million
Post-traumatic stress disorder3.5 million

Some disorders may be very limited in their functional effects, while others may involve substantial disability and support needs. In this context, the terms psychiatric disability and psychological disability are sometimes used instead of mental disorder.[2][3] The degree of ability or disability may vary over time and across different life domains. Furthermore, psychiatric disability has been linked to institutionalization, discrimination and social exclusion as well as to the inherent effects of disorders. Alternatively, functioning may be affected by the stress of having to hide a condition in work or school, etc., by adverse effects of medications or other substances, or by mismatches between illness-related variations and demands for regularity.[74]

It is also the case that, while often being characterized in purely negative terms, some mental traits or states labeled as psychiatric disabilities can also involve above-average creativity, non-conformity, goal-striving, meticulousness, or empathy.[75] In addition, the public perception of the level of disability associated with mental disorders can change.[76]

Nevertheless, internationally, people report equal or greater disability from commonly occurring mental conditions than from commonly occurring physical conditions, particularly in their social roles and personal relationships. The proportion with access to professional help for mental disorders is far lower, however, even among those assessed as having a severe psychiatric disability.[77] Disability in this context may or may not involve such things as:

  • Basic activities of daily living. Including looking after the self (health care, grooming, dressing, shopping, cooking etc.) or looking after accommodation (chores, DIY tasks, etc.)
  • Interpersonal relationships. Including communication skills, ability to form relationships and sustain them, ability to leave the home or mix in crowds or particular settings
  • Occupational functioning. Ability to acquire an employment and hold it, cognitive and social skills required for the job, dealing with workplace culture, or studying as a student.

In terms of total disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is an estimate of how many years of life are lost due to premature death or to being in a state of poor health and disability, psychiatric disabilities rank amongst the most disabling conditions. Unipolar depressive disorder (also known as major depressive disorder) is the third leading cause of disability worldwide, of any condition mental or physical, accounting for 65.5 million years lost. The first systematic description of global disability arising in youth, in 2011, found that among 10- to 24-year-olds nearly half of all disability (current and as estimated to continue) was due to psychiatric disabilities, including substance use disorders and conditions involving self-harm. Second to this were accidental injuries (mainly traffic collisions) accounting for 12 percent of disability, followed by communicable diseases at 10 percent. The psychiatric disabilities associated with most disabilities in high-income countries were unipolar major depression (20%) and alcohol use disorder (11%). In the eastern Mediterranean region, it was unipolar major depression (12%) and schizophrenia (7%), and in Africa it was unipolar major depression (7%) and bipolar disorder (5%).[78]

Suicide, which is often attributed to some underlying mental disorder, is a leading cause of death among teenagers and adults under 35.[79][80] There are an estimated 10 to 20 million non-fatal attempted suicides every year worldwide.[81]

Risk factors

The predominant view as of 2018 is that genetic, psychological, and environmental factors all contribute to the development or progression of mental disorders.[82] Different risk factors may be present at different ages, with risk occurring as early as during prenatal period.[83]

Genetics

A number of psychiatric disorders are linked to a family history (including depression, narcissistic personality disorder[84][85] and anxiety).[86] Twin studies have also revealed a very high heritability for many mental disorders (especially autism and schizophrenia).[87] Although researchers have been looking for decades for clear linkages between genetics and mental disorders, that work has not yielded specific genetic biomarkers yet that might lead to better diagnosis and better treatments.[88]

Statistical research looking at eleven disorders found widespread assortative mating between people with mental illness. That means that individuals with one of these disorders were two to three times more likely than the general population to have a partner with a mental disorder. Sometimes people seemed to have preferred partners with the same mental illness. Thus, people with schizophrenia or ADHD are seven times more likely to have affected partners with the same disorder. This is even more pronounced for people with autism who are 10 times more likely to have a spouse with the same disorder.[89]

Environment

The prevalence of mental illness is higher in more economically unequal countries.

During the prenatal stage, factors like unwanted pregnancy, lack of adaptation to pregnancy or substance use during pregnancy increases the risk of developing a mental disorder.[83] Maternal stress and birth complications including prematurity and infections have also been implicated in increasing susceptibility for mental illness.[90] Infants neglected or not provided optimal nutrition have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment.[83]

Social influences have also been found to be important,[91] including abuse, neglect, bullying, social stress, traumatic events, and other negative or overwhelming life experiences. Aspects of the wider community have also been implicated,[92] including employment problems, socioeconomic inequality, lack of social cohesion, problems linked to migration, and features of particular societies and cultures. The specific risks and pathways to particular disorders are less clear, however.

Nutrition also plays a role in mental disorders.[10][93]

In schizophrenia and psychosis, risk factors include migration and discrimination, childhood trauma, bereavement or separation in families, recreational use of drugs,[94] and urbanicity.[92]

In anxiety, risk factors may include parenting factors including parental rejection, lack of parental warmth, high hostility, harsh discipline, high maternal negative affect, anxious childrearing, modelling of dysfunctional and drug-abusing behavior, and child abuse (emotional, physical and sexual).[95] Adults with imbalance work to life are at higher risk for developing anxiety.[83]

For bipolar disorder, stress (such as childhood adversity) is not a specific cause, but does place genetically and biologically vulnerable individuals at risk for a more severe course of illness.[96]

Drug use

Mental disorders are associated with drug use including: cannabis,[97] alcohol[98] and caffeine,[99] use of which appears to promote anxiety.[100] For psychosis and schizophrenia, usage of a number of drugs has been associated with development of the disorder, including cannabis, cocaine, and amphetamines.[101][97] There has been debate regarding the relationship between usage of cannabis and bipolar disorder.[102] Cannabis has also been associated with depression.[97] Adolescents are at increased risk for tobacco, alcohol and drug use; Peer pressure is the main reason why adolescents start using substances. At this age, the use of substances could be detrimental to the development of the brain and place them at higher risk of developing a mental disorder.[83]

Chronic disease

People living with chronic conditions like HIV and diabetes are at higher risk of developing a mental disorder. People living with diabetes experience significant stress from the biological impact of the disease, which places them at risk for developing anxiety and depression. Diabetic patients also have to deal with emotional stress trying to manage the disease. Conditions like heart disease, stroke, respiratory conditions, cancer, and arthritis increase the risk of developing a mental disorder when compared to the general population.[103]

Personality traits

Risk factors for mental illness include a propensity for high neuroticism[104][105] or "emotional instability". In anxiety, risk factors may include temperament and attitudes (e.g. pessimism).[86]

Causal models

Mental disorders can arise from multiple sources, and in many cases there is no single accepted or consistent cause currently established. An eclectic or pluralistic mix of models may be used to explain particular disorders.[105][106] The primary paradigm of contemporary mainstream Western psychiatry is said to be the biopsychosocial model, which incorporates biological, psychological and social factors, although this may not always be applied in practice.

Biological psychiatry follows a biomedical model where many mental disorders are conceptualized as disorders of brain circuits likely caused by developmental processes shaped by a complex interplay of genetics and experience. A common assumption is that disorders may have resulted from genetic and developmental vulnerabilities, exposed by stress in life (for example in a diathesis–stress model), although there are various views on what causes differences between individuals. Some types of mental disorders may be viewed as primarily neurodevelopmental disorders.[citation needed]

A distinction is sometimes made between a "medical model" or a "social model" of psychiatric disability.[107]

Diagnosis

Psychiatrists seek to provide a medical diagnosis of individuals by an assessment of symptoms, signs and impairment associated with particular types of mental disorder. Other mental health professionals, such as clinical psychologists, may or may not apply the same diagnostic categories to their clinical formulation of a client's difficulties and circumstances.[108] The majority of mental health problems are, at least initially, assessed and treated by family physicians (in the UK general practitioners) during consultations, who may refer a patient on for more specialist diagnosis in acute or chronic cases.

Routine diagnostic practice in mental health services typically involves an interview known as a mental status examination, where evaluations are made of appearance and behavior, self-reported symptoms, mental health history, and current life circumstances. The views of other professionals, relatives, or other third parties may be taken into account. A physical examination to check for ill health or the effects of medications or other drugs may be conducted. Psychological testing is sometimes used via paper-and-pen or computerized questionnaires, which may include algorithms based on ticking off standardized diagnostic criteria, and in rare specialist cases neuroimaging tests may be requested, but such methods are more commonly found in research studies than routine clinical practice.[109][110]

Time and budgetary constraints often limit practicing psychiatrists from conducting more thorough diagnostic evaluations.[111] It has been found that most clinicians evaluate patients using an unstructured, open-ended approach, with limited training in evidence-based assessment methods, and that inaccurate diagnosis may be common in routine practice.[112] In addition, comorbidity is very common in psychiatric diagnosis, where the same person meets the criteria for more than one disorder. On the other hand, a person may have several different difficulties only some of which meet the criteria for being diagnosed. There may be specific problems with accurate diagnosis in developing countries.

More structured approaches are being increasingly used to measure levels of mental illness.

  • HoNOS is the most widely used measure in English mental health services, being used by at least 61 trusts.[113] In HoNOS a score of 0–4 is given for each of 12 factors, based on functional living capacity.[114] Research has been supportive of HoNOS,[115] although some questions have been asked about whether it provides adequate coverage of the range and complexity of mental illness problems, and whether the fact that often only 3 of the 12 scales vary over time gives enough subtlety to accurately measure outcomes of treatment.[116]

Criticism

Since the 1980s, Paula Caplan has been concerned about the subjectivity of psychiatric diagnosis, and people being arbitrarily "slapped with a psychiatric label." Caplan says because psychiatric diagnosis is unregulated, doctors are not required to spend much time interviewing patients or to seek a second opinion. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders can lead a psychiatrist to focus on narrow checklists of symptoms, with little consideration of what is actually causing the person's problems. So, according to Caplan, getting a psychiatric diagnosis and label often stands in the way of recovery.[117]

In 2013, psychiatrist Allen Frances wrote a paper entitled "The New Crisis of Confidence in Psychiatric Diagnosis", which said that "psychiatric diagnosis... still relies exclusively on fallible subjective judgments rather than objective biological tests." Frances was also concerned about "unpredictable overdiagnosis."[118] For many years, marginalized psychiatrists (such as Peter Breggin, Thomas Szasz) and outside critics (such as Stuart A. Kirk) have "been accusing psychiatry of engaging in the systematic medicalization of normality." More recently these concerns have come from insiders who have worked for and promoted the American Psychiatric Association (e.g., Robert Spitzer, Allen Frances).[119] A 2002 editorial in the British Medical Journal warned of inappropriate medicalization leading to disease mongering, where the boundaries of the definition of illnesses are expanded to include personal problems as medical problems or risks of diseases are emphasized to broaden the market for medications.[120]

Gary Greenberg, a psychoanalyst, in his book "the Book of Woe", argues that mental illness is really about suffering and how the DSM creates diagnostic labels to categorize people's suffering.[121] Indeed, the psychiatrist Thomas Szasz, in his book "the Medicalization of Everyday Life", also argues that what is psychiatric illness, is not always biological in nature (i.e. social problems, poverty, etc.), and may even be a part of the human condition.[122]

Potential routine use of MRI/fMRI in diagnosis

in 2018 the American Psychological Association commissioned a review to reach a consensus on whether modern clinical MRI/fMRI will be able to be used in the diagnosis of mental health disorders. The criteria presented by the APA stated that the biomarkers used in diagnosis should:

  1. "have a sensitivity of at least 80% for detecting a particular psychiatric disorder"
  2. should "have a specificity of at least 80% for distinguishing this disorder from other psychiatric or medical disorders"
  3. "should be reliable, reproducible, and ideally be noninvasive, simple to perform, and inexpensive"
  4. proposed biomarkers should be verified by 2 independent studies each by a different investigator and different population samples and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The review concluded that although neuroimaging diagnosis may technically be feasible, very large studies are needed to evaluate specific biomarkers which were not available.[123]

Prevention

The 2004 WHO report "Prevention of Mental Disorders" stated that "Prevention of these disorders is obviously one of the most effective ways to reduce the [disease] burden."[124] The 2011 European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on prevention of mental disorders states "There is considerable evidence that various psychiatric conditions can be prevented through the implementation of effective evidence-based interventions."[125] A 2011 UK Department of Health report on the economic case for mental health promotion and mental illness prevention found that "many interventions are outstandingly good value for money, low in cost and often become self-financing over time, saving public expenditure".[126] In 2016, the National Institute of Mental Health re-affirmed prevention as a research priority area.[127]

Parenting may affect the child's mental health, and evidence suggests that helping parents to be more effective with their children can address mental health needs.[128][129][130]

Universal prevention (aimed at a population that has no increased risk for developing a mental disorder, such as school programs or mass media campaigns) need very high numbers of people to show effect (sometimes known as the "power" problem). Approaches to overcome this are (1) focus on high-incidence groups (e.g. by targeting groups with high risk factors), (2) use multiple interventions to achieve greater, and thus more statistically valid, effects, (3) use cumulative meta-analyses of many trials, and (4) run very large trials.[131][132]

Management

The "Haus Tornow am See" (former manor house) in Germany from 1912 is today separated into a special education school and a hotel with integrated work/job- and rehabilitation-training for people with mental disorders.

Treatment and support for mental disorders are provided in psychiatric hospitals, clinics or a range of community mental health services. In some countries services are increasingly based on a recovery approach, intended to support individuals' personal journey to gain the kind of life they want.

There is a range of different types of treatment and what is most suitable depends on the disorder and the individual. Many things have been found to help at least some people, and a placebo effect may play a role in any intervention or medication. In a minority of cases, individuals may be treated against their will, which can cause particular difficulties depending on how it is carried out and perceived. Compulsory treatment while in the community versus non-compulsory treatment does not appear to make much of a difference except by maybe decreasing victimization.[133]

Lifestyle

Lifestyle strategies, including dietary changes, exercise and quitting smoking may be of benefit.[13][93][134]

Therapy

There is also a wide range of psychotherapists (including family therapists), counselors, and public health professionals. In addition, there are peer support roles where personal experience of similar issues is the primary source of expertise.[135][136][137][138]

A major option for many mental disorders is psychotherapy. There are several main types. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is widely used and is based on modifying the patterns of thought and behavior associated with a particular disorder. Other psychotherapies include dialectic behavioral therapy (DBT) and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). Psychoanalysis, addressing underlying psychic conflicts and defenses, has been a dominant school of psychotherapy and is still in use. Systemic therapy or family therapy is sometimes used, addressing a network of significant others as well as an individual.

Some psychotherapies are based on a humanistic approach. There are many specific therapies used for particular disorders, which may be offshoots or hybrids of the above types. Mental health professionals often employ an eclectic or integrative approach. Much may depend on the therapeutic relationship, and there may be problems with trust, confidentiality and engagement.

Medication


































댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

프리드리히 2세(독일어: Friedrich II, 1712년 1월 24일 ~ 1786년 8월 17일)는 독일 프로이센 왕국의 제3대 프로이센 국왕이다(재위 : 1740년 5월 31일 - 1786년 8월 17일). 종교에 대한 관용 정책을 펼치고 재판과정에서 고문을 근절한 계몽군주였다.국가를 통치하고 인재를 기용하는 것과 군대 조직과 군대의 지휘, 정복전쟁 지휘를 직접 담당하는 등의 역할을 모두 빈틈없이 해결했다. 뛰어난 군사적 재능과 합리적인 국가경영을 발휘해 프로이센을 당시 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 성장시켰을 뿐만 아니라 플루트 연주 등 예술적 재능과 관심까지 겸비하고 있었기에 계몽전제군주의 전형으로 여겨진다.또한 오스트리아와의 전쟁에서 승리를 거두어 독일 제국 내의 프로이센의 패권을 차지하였다. 오스트리아와 주변 강국에 맞선 외교전략과 전쟁을 통해 프로이센의 영토를 확장하고 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 만든 특출한 군사 전략가였다. 그는 신성 로마 제국의 해체와 독일 통일을 이루는 데 주도적 역할을 했다. 또한 군사 병력을 위해 국민징병제를 실시해 프로이센 남자들만 군입대를 시켜 군사훈련을 강화시켰다[1]는 평가도 있다.또한 가톨릭과 개신교간의 갈등이 극심했던 독일내 왕국, 공국들과는 다른, 모든 종교에 관용적인 정책을 폈고 보통교육을 확대했으며 성문헌법 제정작업에도 참여했다. 정치분야에서는 스스로를 국가의 첫 번째 종이라고 자처하면서 전제정치에 인간적인 자비로움을 접목시키려고 시도해 개화된 독재라는 평가를 받고 있다. 샤를마뉴, 나폴레옹과 함께 유럽의 위대한 지도자의 한 사람으로 꼽힌다. 그 공적을 기리기 위해 후세에 독일인들로부터 프리드리히 대왕(Friedrich der Große, Friedrich der Grosse, Friedrich the Great), 영광의 프리드리히(honor of Frederick) 등으로 불리게 된다.악습 폐지1740년 5월 31일 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세가 세상을 떠나자 프리드리히가 새 왕으로 즉위했다. 프리드리히 2세는 즉위하자마자 즉시 계몽주의적인 개혁정책에 돌입했다. 즉위 초기에 바로 고문 폐지, 언론 검열 폐지, 종교적 차별금지를 추진, 법으로 제정해 나갔고 즉위 초기에 오페라 극장 건설, 빈민구제, 거인 연대 폐지 등이 실행되었다. 선왕 때부터 원성이 자자했던 왕실 근위부대를 해산했다.학문부흥사업또한 죄수들에 대한 대사면을 단행하였지만, 죄인들의 죄질과 성격은 꼼꼼히 따져서 석방을 결정하는 등의 수완을 발휘했다. 학문을 멸시했던 선왕 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세의 반지성주의 아래 폐업이나 다름없는 상태였던 베를린 아카테미를 부흥시켜 과거에 추방되었던 학자들을 다시 불러들임으로써, 베를린은 ‘북방의 아테네’로 칭송받게 되었다. 프리드리히 2세 국왕 치세에 독일에서는 의무교육을 실시하는데, 국가의 통치이념을 교육하기 위한 것이었지만 의무교육은 독일 사람들이 글을 읽고 쓸 수 있도록 하였다.저술활동또한 볼테르의 도움으로 그는 《반(反) 마키아벨리론》을 공식 발표해 문단에 데뷔하기도 했다. 이 책은 자비·정의·의무·책임감을 바탕으로 한 군주의 윤리, 통치자의 윤리를 규정하고 있다. 그러나 그의 친구들뿐만 아니라 자기 자신조차도 놀랄 만큼 위축되었다. 그들은 적대 진영과 마찬가지로 예술애호와 자유방임을 주창하는 정권의 도래를 성급하게 환영했지만, 프리드리히가 선왕보다 못하다는 것을 발견했다.[4] 한편, 프리드리히 2세는 주위의 반대를 무릅쓰고 아버지로부터 물려받은 8만 명의 상비군을 더욱 증원시켜 차후에 있을 전쟁에 대비하였다.그는 신뢰, 책임감을 지도자의 최고의 덕목으로 규정했다. 목표 달성을 위해서 방법을 가리지 않는 것을 그는 불쾌히 여겼다.부국강병1744년 5월 24일 동프리슬란트 공작 카를 에드차르트(Carl Edzard)가 후계자 없이 사망하자 프리드리히는 동프리슬란트를 점령하여 병합하였다. 전후, 프리드리히 2세는 프로이센의 부흥을 위해 온 힘을 다했다.명실상부한 대왕의 위치를 굳히기 위해 프리드리히는 그동안 주창해온 시민국가에 대한 봉사·의무의 실현에 주력했다. 먼저 자신의 문학적 관심과 취미를 충족시키기 위해 노력했을 뿐만 아니라 예술과 과학의 열렬한 후원자임을 입증했다. 그는 책과 논문, 시 등 다양한 문학작품을 저술하는 데 심혈을 기울이고 정부 간행물에 대한 지원도 아끼지 않았다.[5] 세세한 일까지 자신이 직접 확인하였으며, 산업 진흥과 이민자 수용 등을 통해 프로이센은 다시 국력을 키워갔다.또한 직접 '앞으로 1마리의 고양이라도 공격하지 않을 것'이라면서 불가피한 경우를 제외하고 일체의 전쟁을 중단하겠다고 선언하여 평화의지를 과시하는 한편, 예상되는 외부침략에 대비해 군대를 훈련시키고 기병을 강화했다.[5] 병력 증강과 군비를 늘리게 되자 오스트리아와 남부 독일 지방의 소왕국, 공국들은 다시 긴장했고, 그의 평화론에 의문을 제기하며 다시 오스트리아를 중심으로 똘똘 뭉쳤다. 그러나 오랜 격무 탓에 프리드리히 2세의 건강은 갈수록 나빠졌다. 그러나 평화로운 날은 오래 가지 못했다.이후 그는 바쁜 정무 와중에도 틈틈이 시간을 내어 서신 왕래나 플룻 연주, 저술활동을 즐기며 지낸다. 그러나 프리드리히는 처음부터 몇몇 소수의 친밀한 인사들과 교류하며 제한적인 인간관계를 형성했다. 또한 그는 사람을 경멸하는 태도를 드러내 귀족들과 관료, 외교관들의 비위를 건드리기도 했다.[6] 생애 후반에 갈수록 그의 인간 불신, 인간 혐오는 심해졌다.만년의 프리드리히 2세는 그의 가족이나 친구가 모두 죽자, 점차 고독해 하고 다른 사람을 멀리하기 시작했다. 그는 수많은 예술가들을 궁정으로 초대하여 시인, 음악가 등을 재정적으로 후원하는 등 문화예술인의 보호자를 자처했다. 그러나 그의 고독과 인간 불신은 사라지지 않았다. 오직 애견 그레이하운드들만이 그의 위로대상이었다.그 때문에 원체 허약했던 몸이 한층 더 악화되어 심장 발작이나 호흡 곤란에 시달리면서 하루의 대부분을 의자에 앉아 보냈다. 그는 마지막 소원이라면서 애견들 곁에 묻어달라고 부탁했다고 한다.프리드리히 2세는 1786년 8월 17일 포츠담의 상수시 궁전에서 갑작스레 죽게 된다. 당시 대왕의 나이는 74세였다.Frederick II (German: Friedrich II.; 24 January 1712 – 17 August 1786) was the monarch of Prussia from 1740 until his death in 1786. He was the last Hohenzollern monarch titled King in Prussia, declaring himself King of Prussia after annexing Royal Prussia from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1772. His most significant accomplishments include military successes in the Silesian wars, reorganisation of the Prussian Army, the First Partition of Poland, and patronage of the arts and the Enlightenment. Prussia greatly increased its territories and became a major military power in Europe under his rule. He became known as Frederick the Great (German: Friedrich der Große) and was nicknamed "Old Fritz" (German: der Alte Fritz).-----------------프레드렉,프리드리히대왕에 대한 고찰목격관찰결과 : 은하연합참조, 상부참조. 프리드리히대왕->고구려상장군 을지문덕 -> 임경업 -> 프리드리히대왕 -> 빌헬름왕가 빌헬름 1세프리드리히 3세빌헬름 2세 병행 -> 비스마르크 병행 (이 과정부터 기미두(박원규,원균,프리프라바라티,아이젠하워,펠레콘),이건희(필립공 영국여왕남편, 웨일즈왕가원시조상왕격,삼성그룹2대총수,중국국가상무위원 위정성계열-루퍼쓰,아루쓰로서 기미두아종)가 개입하여 아돌프히틀러, 히믈러(독고신, 말데크독룡), 구데리안(이재용,필립보로서 열두사도로 위장된 중국놈 이재용 당현종-이건희프로젝트로 유인된후 살해되어 이건희가 만든 지옥맵,이건희서재에 감금구속된 박종권이가 과거 용강리박종권시절부터 이복순의 음모로서 기미두,당고모(측천무후,기미두원아종)안일규(라이라12주신-대흑암지옥마귀대장12놈, 라이라여주신,임청하,삼합회회장놈이자 중국을 장악한 라이라주신급인 동시에 라마12승의 원조격, 라마12승은 훗날 여호와라고 불리는 이상한 놈들로 위승격, 측천무후의 아들, 슈퍼맨을 죽이고 불구자로 만든 루퍼쓰놈)가 위조작하여 만든 이영애(이영애는 최초 당고모 측천무후년이 주제에 안맞게 제년이 이영애를 한다며 최초시발하였으나 더럽고 추하고 촌스럽고 부적합하여 박종권이가 대리하여 간신히 이영애역할을 한 것으로 목격관찰, 이 과정에서 이복순이가 이영애로 박종권이를 유인하는데 그게 용강리 박종권이었으며, 박종권이의 경우는 이분화되어 한쪽은 을지문덕계열의 임경업, 다른 한쪽은 이영애로 연결되는 세종대왕라인으로 이분화되며, 이 세종대왕라인은 다시 원신라 박혁거세, 원효대사와 연결됨을 목격관찰하다. 여기서 박종권이의 원본래를 말한다면 을지문덕계통의 임경업, 최배달이 원본래이며 세종대왕과 박혁거세의 경우는, 이 새끼들의 불국토제안, 부모자식관계제안, 내가 과거에는 그랬지만 이제는 안 그러려고 한다는 간교한 속임수에 속아서 이중분기된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 특히 세종대왕의 경우는, 허다한 인육죄업,5대죄업으로 나치독일패망, 대영제국패망, 미국경제와해등으로 존폐의 기로에 선 인육무리들, 대흑암지옥마귀들로서의 이른바 지구지배계층놈들이 회생하기 위한 편법으로서 제안된 것으로서, 세종대왕을 악용하여 실제로는 제2차세계대전종결후 가난궁핍속에서 고통받아야 했던 무리들이 회생하게 된 이유가 되었음을 목격관찰하다. 세종대왕으로 인하여, 독일의 라인강기적이 왔으며, 일본경제의 부흥이 왔으며, 미국경제가 회생되었으며, 망해가던 대영제국이 다시 영연방으로 올라서는데 그 과정에서 이 대흑암지옥의 패역한 무리들이 그러한 일을 해준 세종대왕과 프리드리히대왕, 명치천황, 임경업, 이순신등을 모두 배후를 쳐서 살인하여 죽이고 이영애로 만든후 남경대학살에서 목을 잘라 참살하고, 현생하급하층민으로 대속되어 나자렛예수대속희생양으로 전락한 박종권이까지 죽이려 드는 사태로 파급되다로 목격관찰되다.(참조 : 제2차 세계 대전 이후 경제 팽창은 전후 경제 호황 또는 자본주의의 황금기[1][2]로도 알려져 있으며, 제2차 세계 대전의 여파와 함께 시작되어 1973~1975년 경기후퇴로 끝난 전 세계적인 경제 팽창 기간을 말한다.[1] 특히 미국, 소련, 오스트레일리아와 서유럽 및 동아시아 국가들은 완전 고용과 함께 이례적으로 높고 지속적인 성장을 경험했다.초기의 예측과 달리, 이 높은 성장은 일본(고도경제성장), 서독과 오스트리아(라인강의 기적), 대한민국(한강의 기적), 벨기에(벨기에의 경제 기적), 프랑스(영광의 30년), 이탈리아(이탈리아의 경제 기적) 및 그리스(그리스의 경제 기적)와 같이 전쟁으로 폐허가 된 많은 국가를 포함했다. 심지어 스웨덴(기록 시대)과 같이 전쟁의 영향을 비교적 덜 받은 국가들도 상당한 경제 성장을 경험했다.-> 이러한 경제회생기적은 근본적으로는 세종대왕의 선업공덕을 찬립한 결과로서, 20000인의 아르하트급박종권 복제복사를 통하여 독일의 경제부흥과 일본경제부흥이 성취되었음을 목격관찰하다. 이들의 원업과 원성품상 이와같은 일은 절대로 불가능했다. 독일은 프리드리히대왕, 일본은 명치유신의 명치천황에 의한 부흥이며 전전에는 이와같았으되 전후에는 이들의 허다한 중죄업(인육죄업,5대죄업등 무서운 죄업들)으로 인해 잘 먹고 잘 살고 선진부국이 된 다는 것이 아예 불가능했으나, 세종대왕을 내세워 이를 간신히 모면한 것으로 목격관찰되는데 다만 이 세종대왕조차도, 우중문이라는 놈이 제놈 주제에 하나님이 되겠다며 세종대왕을 때려죽이고 준성단급 품격과 등급, 선업공덕을 강제로 찬탈찬립하여 자행함으로서 종국에는 제3차세계대전이 발발하게 된 주요이유가 된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이재용이 놈은, 루마니아왕조의 시조왕으로서 현재 차우셰쿠스놈이며, 이병철,이건희,이재용,박원규 이 네놈이 누리는 부귀영화와 영광은 이루 말로 표현할수 없었으나 이들을 이렇게 만들어준 주역들은 하급인축생인박종권으로 전락되어 음옥과 무간지옥 팔대구천지옥과 팔승지옥등 무서운 지옥을 떠도는 망령이 되었다. 이와같이 된 주요원인을 보면, 첫째는 부처로 알려진 잡놈인데 이 새끼가 해탈성불하기 위하여 박종권이를 부처인육대속을 자행했으며, 두번째는 나자렛예수인데, 우중문이 같이 무식무지미개한 놈으로서 영광의 하나님(준성단급)이 되겠다며 강제로 임의대속을 자행하여 골고다언덕에서 열두사도로 위장한 말데크인육룡들이 담합하여 때려죽인후, 영구죽음을 자행하고 이 글을 쓰는 하급하층민 축생급박종권으로 전락시킨후 이영애를 만들어 음옥에 처박은후, 다시 이 이영애를 이재용이 새끼를 시켜서 목을 잘라 죽인후 당고종놈에게 바치고, 양귀비를 만든후, 다시 측천무후가 된 당고모놈(바바라핸드클로우로서 아주 지적이고 참한 외계플레이아데스여성으로 위장, 박종권아르하트급의 좋은 것을 이영애를 죽이고 모조리 빼앗은 결과, 실제로 이 당고모라는 놈은 기미두자신이다. 마거릿힐다대처도 마찬가지로 기미두놈 그 자신인데, 이 씹새끼는 제놈의 현생아들 박종권이라는 것을 알면서도 무려 17번에 걸쳐서 칠천량해전맵과 남경대학살맵등에서 목을 잘라서 참살하여 죽이고 좋은 것을 빼앗으며 종국에는 마거릿힐다대처까지 된 놈으로 목격관찰되다. 이영애가 된 박종권이는 당고모놈 측천무후놈이 때려죽였으며, 이후 사지를 절단하고 변소측간에 처박은 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이와같이 잔인하고 흉포하고 간악한 놈들로서 절대로 인육주식하는 놈들과는 일을 해서는 안되며 동행해서도 안된다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 최초에 어떤 개새끼가 이런 프로젝트를 기안하고 실행했는지 반드시 시간의 제한없이 영구추적하여 밝히고 중처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것)이들 스스로는 이와같은 일을 할수 없다는 것이 매우 명백하다는 것이 목격관찰결과이다.이 호황은 냉전이 절정에 달했을 때 포스트모더니즘, 탈식민지화, 소비주의의 현저한 증가, 복지국가, 우주 경쟁, 비동맹 운동, 수입 대체 산업화, 1960년대 반문화, 제2세대 여성주의의 시작, 핵 군비 경쟁을 포함한 광범위한 글로벌 변화의 조건을 형성했다. 이와같은 일은, 한순조,동탁,장비,항우의 연장선상인 이건희놈과 박종권이의 현생거짓애비놈 박원규(원균이자 프타이며 아이젠하워이며 펠레콘이 된 놈, 나자렛예수의 거짓애비 성요셉역할을 한 말데크곤충룡, 말데크개룡)놈이 영구복락을 목적으로, 나자렛예수2차대속을 자행하려하여 사태가 이와같이 악화된 이유로 목격관찰되다. 이들은 인육주식하며 반우주마귀들로서 사람으로서 살아이영애를 당고종에게 바쳐 측천무후가 이영애를 때려죽이게 만든 놈이며 삼성그룹3대총수이자 당현종인 놈이 나자렛예수음모에 적극개입하여 열두사도놈으로 위장, 필립보가 되다. 개나 소나 전부 여호와가 된 이유), 헤르만괴링, 롬멜등 5인의 나치지도자놈들이 프리드리히대왕을 해코지하여 살해)오토 에두아르트 레오폴트 폰 비스마르크쇤하우젠 후작(독일어: Otto Eduard Leopold Fürst von Bismarck-Schönhausen, 1815년 4월 1일 ~ 1898년 7월 30일)은 독일을 통일하여 독일 제국을 건설한 프로이센의 외교관이자 정치인이다. -> 비스마르크시기부터 기미두놈이 독고신(히틀러)놈으로 개입하여 프리드리히대왕을 사라예보폭탄테러에서 죽였으며, 이에 대한 후유증으로 심각한 고통의 지옥에 감금되는데, 장소와 영역을 보면, 화성이었던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 화성에 도시가 건설되었으며 이는 영화 토탈리콜에 묘사된 것과 같으며, 한 시기 말데크악룡놈이 화성도시에서 살았던 것이 목격관찰되고, 이 시기의 화성 역시 오늘날의 지구와 동일한 체계로서 움직인 것으로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕시대는 이 화성으로 확장된다로 목격관찰되다. 화성과 해왕성 그리고 달은 서로 겹쳐지는바, 이 세군데가 모두 인육제조시설을 갖춘 인육주식장소로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕 사후 필사적인 탈출과정에서 고구려가 제안되는데, 고구려상장군이 바로 프리드리히대왕일계로 목격관찰되고 다시 을지문덕계가 임경업, 최배달과 일계로서 관찰되는데, 지금 기미두와 이건희,이재용이 놈이 마구잡이로 패죽이고 찢어죽이는 대상은 프리드리히대왕,고구려상장군을지문덕계로서의 임경업이며, 임경업이를 패죽이려고 자행하는 놈이 바로 조선선조 우중문이 놈과 이상노(광해군놈으로서 현생박종권이의 외삼촌이나 말데크촌수로는 동생놈 박종성이 놈임, 이양순이도 동생놈 박종성이고 박종성이가 분기하여 이노임, 이양순, 이상노, 이현순이 되는 과정에 목격관찰되다. 박종성이 놈은 현생동생이다.)로서 임경업이는 또 대우그룹 창업자와 연관되는데, 대우그룹을 잡고, 프리드리히도 잡으려는 목적으로 만든 캐릭터가 임경업으로 목격관찰되다. 그리고 임경업이는 정밀관찰시 박종권 나 자신이다. 박종권원본래를 때려죽이려고 제안된 캐릭터가 임경업이다. 그리고 그렇게 하는 놈이 외삼촌을 주장하는 이상노라는 놈인데, 이 새끼는 영국왕조지5세이자 조선광해군으로 목격관찰되고 이어서 육영수라는 잡년으로 목격관찰된다. 임경업의 경우, 내가 보건대, 이상노가 외삼촌이고 이중근이가 외조부로서 호감과 선의로서 돕고자 참여한 캐릭터이고 이유를 보면 왕을 하기에는 이상노가 부족했으므로 이것을 보완해주는 목적이었으나 이 패악패역한 놈들이 이를 악용하여 나를 죽인 것이다. 이게 내 외조부놈이고 내 외삼촌놈이며 내 어미,애비였다. 이 문제를 상부에 고소하고, 이들 전원을 재판에 회부하여 영구파문할것, 영구죽음처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것. 특히 나의 원등급원지위원서열원신분상 직접무력폭력폭행구타는 거의 불가능한데도 마구잡이 구타폭력이 자행되는 이유는 부모자식관계로서 특히 박원규(기미두,아이젠하워)놈이며, 이 새끼가 직접무력폭행하는 놈으로서, 마거릿힐다대처라는 놈이 나를 직접 무력구타폭행한 이유가 바로 기미두놈이 마거릿힐다대처였기에 가능했던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 부모자식관계를 악용한 해코지를 엄중처벌하고 박원규,이복순을 영구파문할것, 영구추방할것, 함께 하지 않는다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것 기존의 가족친인척관계 전체를 영구파문할것 단 한놈도 가족친인척이 아니며 단 한놈도 친구가 없었다로 전원영구파문할것 전원 함께 하지 않는다로 지속적처리할것 고통은 이건희같은 하등무식무지미개한 놈이 내가 했던 역할을 제놈이 한 것으로 처리하겠다며 들러붙어 있는 것에서 오는바, 이 자를 영구파문할것 영구죽음시킬것 지속적처리할것(기미두 동일, 우리가 관찰한바로는 미물버러지수준밖에 안되는 놈들로서 이들이 사는 초극렬지옥에서는 장군노릇을 할지 모르나, 상급상위상천계로 오면 졸지에 미물버러지로 전락되는 놈들로 목격관찰되다) Frederick II프리드리히 2세을지문덕(乙支文德The SakaSiddhartha GautamatheBuddha예수JesusofNazareth임경업(林慶業靈魂魄等級右側女子之眼 靈魂魄等級

프리드리히 2세(독일어: Friedrich II, 1712년 1월 24일 ~ 1786년 8월 17일)는 독일 프로이센 왕국의 제3대 프로이센 국왕이다(재위 : 1740년 5월 31일 - 1786년 8월 17일). 종교에 대한 관용 정책을 펼치고 재판과정에서 고문을 근절한 계몽군주였다.국가를 통치하고 인재를 기용하는 것과 군대 조직과 군대의 지휘, 정복전쟁 지휘를 직접 담당하는 등의 역할을 모두 빈틈없이 해결했다. 뛰어난 군사적 재능과 합리적인 국가경영을 발휘해 프로이센을 당시 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 성장시켰을 뿐만 아니라 플루트 연주 등 예술적 재능과 관심까지 겸비하고 있었기에 계몽전제군주의 전형으로 여겨진다.또한 오스트리아와의 전쟁에서 승리를 거두어 독일 제국 내의 프로이센의 패권을 차지하였다. 오스트리아와 주변 강국에 맞선 외교전략과 전쟁을 통해 프로이센의 영토를 확장하고 유럽 최강의 군사대국으로 만든 특출한 군사 전략가였다. 그는 신성 로마 제국의 해체와 독일 통일을 이루는 데 주도적 역할을 했다. 또한 군사 병력을 위해 국민징병제를 실시해 프로이센 남자들만 군입대를 시켜 군사훈련을 강화시켰다[1]는 평가도 있다.또한 가톨릭과 개신교간의 갈등이 극심했던 독일내 왕국, 공국들과는 다른, 모든 종교에 관용적인 정책을 폈고 보통교육을 확대했으며 성문헌법 제정작업에도 참여했다. 정치분야에서는 스스로를 국가의 첫 번째 종이라고 자처하면서 전제정치에 인간적인 자비로움을 접목시키려고 시도해 개화된 독재라는 평가를 받고 있다. 샤를마뉴, 나폴레옹과 함께 유럽의 위대한 지도자의 한 사람으로 꼽힌다. 그 공적을 기리기 위해 후세에 독일인들로부터 프리드리히 대왕(Friedrich der Große, Friedrich der Grosse, Friedrich the Great), 영광의 프리드리히(honor of Frederick) 등으로 불리게 된다.악습 폐지1740년 5월 31일 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세가 세상을 떠나자 프리드리히가 새 왕으로 즉위했다. 프리드리히 2세는 즉위하자마자 즉시 계몽주의적인 개혁정책에 돌입했다. 즉위 초기에 바로 고문 폐지, 언론 검열 폐지, 종교적 차별금지를 추진, 법으로 제정해 나갔고 즉위 초기에 오페라 극장 건설, 빈민구제, 거인 연대 폐지 등이 실행되었다. 선왕 때부터 원성이 자자했던 왕실 근위부대를 해산했다.학문부흥사업또한 죄수들에 대한 대사면을 단행하였지만, 죄인들의 죄질과 성격은 꼼꼼히 따져서 석방을 결정하는 등의 수완을 발휘했다. 학문을 멸시했던 선왕 프리드리히 빌헬름 1세의 반지성주의 아래 폐업이나 다름없는 상태였던 베를린 아카테미를 부흥시켜 과거에 추방되었던 학자들을 다시 불러들임으로써, 베를린은 ‘북방의 아테네’로 칭송받게 되었다. 프리드리히 2세 국왕 치세에 독일에서는 의무교육을 실시하는데, 국가의 통치이념을 교육하기 위한 것이었지만 의무교육은 독일 사람들이 글을 읽고 쓸 수 있도록 하였다.저술활동또한 볼테르의 도움으로 그는 《반(反) 마키아벨리론》을 공식 발표해 문단에 데뷔하기도 했다. 이 책은 자비·정의·의무·책임감을 바탕으로 한 군주의 윤리, 통치자의 윤리를 규정하고 있다. 그러나 그의 친구들뿐만 아니라 자기 자신조차도 놀랄 만큼 위축되었다. 그들은 적대 진영과 마찬가지로 예술애호와 자유방임을 주창하는 정권의 도래를 성급하게 환영했지만, 프리드리히가 선왕보다 못하다는 것을 발견했다.[4] 한편, 프리드리히 2세는 주위의 반대를 무릅쓰고 아버지로부터 물려받은 8만 명의 상비군을 더욱 증원시켜 차후에 있을 전쟁에 대비하였다.그는 신뢰, 책임감을 지도자의 최고의 덕목으로 규정했다. 목표 달성을 위해서 방법을 가리지 않는 것을 그는 불쾌히 여겼다.부국강병1744년 5월 24일 동프리슬란트 공작 카를 에드차르트(Carl Edzard)가 후계자 없이 사망하자 프리드리히는 동프리슬란트를 점령하여 병합하였다. 전후, 프리드리히 2세는 프로이센의 부흥을 위해 온 힘을 다했다.명실상부한 대왕의 위치를 굳히기 위해 프리드리히는 그동안 주창해온 시민국가에 대한 봉사·의무의 실현에 주력했다. 먼저 자신의 문학적 관심과 취미를 충족시키기 위해 노력했을 뿐만 아니라 예술과 과학의 열렬한 후원자임을 입증했다. 그는 책과 논문, 시 등 다양한 문학작품을 저술하는 데 심혈을 기울이고 정부 간행물에 대한 지원도 아끼지 않았다.[5] 세세한 일까지 자신이 직접 확인하였으며, 산업 진흥과 이민자 수용 등을 통해 프로이센은 다시 국력을 키워갔다.또한 직접 '앞으로 1마리의 고양이라도 공격하지 않을 것'이라면서 불가피한 경우를 제외하고 일체의 전쟁을 중단하겠다고 선언하여 평화의지를 과시하는 한편, 예상되는 외부침략에 대비해 군대를 훈련시키고 기병을 강화했다.[5] 병력 증강과 군비를 늘리게 되자 오스트리아와 남부 독일 지방의 소왕국, 공국들은 다시 긴장했고, 그의 평화론에 의문을 제기하며 다시 오스트리아를 중심으로 똘똘 뭉쳤다. 그러나 오랜 격무 탓에 프리드리히 2세의 건강은 갈수록 나빠졌다. 그러나 평화로운 날은 오래 가지 못했다.이후 그는 바쁜 정무 와중에도 틈틈이 시간을 내어 서신 왕래나 플룻 연주, 저술활동을 즐기며 지낸다. 그러나 프리드리히는 처음부터 몇몇 소수의 친밀한 인사들과 교류하며 제한적인 인간관계를 형성했다. 또한 그는 사람을 경멸하는 태도를 드러내 귀족들과 관료, 외교관들의 비위를 건드리기도 했다.[6] 생애 후반에 갈수록 그의 인간 불신, 인간 혐오는 심해졌다.만년의 프리드리히 2세는 그의 가족이나 친구가 모두 죽자, 점차 고독해 하고 다른 사람을 멀리하기 시작했다. 그는 수많은 예술가들을 궁정으로 초대하여 시인, 음악가 등을 재정적으로 후원하는 등 문화예술인의 보호자를 자처했다. 그러나 그의 고독과 인간 불신은 사라지지 않았다. 오직 애견 그레이하운드들만이 그의 위로대상이었다.그 때문에 원체 허약했던 몸이 한층 더 악화되어 심장 발작이나 호흡 곤란에 시달리면서 하루의 대부분을 의자에 앉아 보냈다. 그는 마지막 소원이라면서 애견들 곁에 묻어달라고 부탁했다고 한다.프리드리히 2세는 1786년 8월 17일 포츠담의 상수시 궁전에서 갑작스레 죽게 된다. 당시 대왕의 나이는 74세였다.Frederick II (German: Friedrich II.; 24 January 1712 – 17 August 1786) was the monarch of Prussia from 1740 until his death in 1786. He was the last Hohenzollern monarch titled King in Prussia, declaring himself King of Prussia after annexing Royal Prussia from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1772. His most significant accomplishments include military successes in the Silesian wars, reorganisation of the Prussian Army, the First Partition of Poland, and patronage of the arts and the Enlightenment. Prussia greatly increased its territories and became a major military power in Europe under his rule. He became known as Frederick the Great (German: Friedrich der Große) and was nicknamed "Old Fritz" (German: der Alte Fritz).-----------------프레드렉,프리드리히대왕에 대한 고찰목격관찰결과 : 은하연합참조, 상부참조. 프리드리히대왕->고구려상장군 을지문덕 -> 임경업 -> 프리드리히대왕 -> 빌헬름왕가 빌헬름 1세프리드리히 3세빌헬름 2세 병행 -> 비스마르크 병행 (이 과정부터 기미두(박원규,원균,프리프라바라티,아이젠하워,펠레콘),이건희(필립공 영국여왕남편, 웨일즈왕가원시조상왕격,삼성그룹2대총수,중국국가상무위원 위정성계열-루퍼쓰,아루쓰로서 기미두아종)가 개입하여 아돌프히틀러, 히믈러(독고신, 말데크독룡), 구데리안(이재용,필립보로서 열두사도로 위장된 중국놈 이재용 당현종-이건희프로젝트로 유인된후 살해되어 이건희가 만든 지옥맵,이건희서재에 감금구속된 박종권이가 과거 용강리박종권시절부터 이복순의 음모로서 기미두,당고모(측천무후,기미두원아종)안일규(라이라12주신-대흑암지옥마귀대장12놈, 라이라여주신,임청하,삼합회회장놈이자 중국을 장악한 라이라주신급인 동시에 라마12승의 원조격, 라마12승은 훗날 여호와라고 불리는 이상한 놈들로 위승격, 측천무후의 아들, 슈퍼맨을 죽이고 불구자로 만든 루퍼쓰놈)가 위조작하여 만든 이영애(이영애는 최초 당고모 측천무후년이 주제에 안맞게 제년이 이영애를 한다며 최초시발하였으나 더럽고 추하고 촌스럽고 부적합하여 박종권이가 대리하여 간신히 이영애역할을 한 것으로 목격관찰, 이 과정에서 이복순이가 이영애로 박종권이를 유인하는데 그게 용강리 박종권이었으며, 박종권이의 경우는 이분화되어 한쪽은 을지문덕계열의 임경업, 다른 한쪽은 이영애로 연결되는 세종대왕라인으로 이분화되며, 이 세종대왕라인은 다시 원신라 박혁거세, 원효대사와 연결됨을 목격관찰하다. 여기서 박종권이의 원본래를 말한다면 을지문덕계통의 임경업, 최배달이 원본래이며 세종대왕과 박혁거세의 경우는, 이 새끼들의 불국토제안, 부모자식관계제안, 내가 과거에는 그랬지만 이제는 안 그러려고 한다는 간교한 속임수에 속아서 이중분기된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 특히 세종대왕의 경우는, 허다한 인육죄업,5대죄업으로 나치독일패망, 대영제국패망, 미국경제와해등으로 존폐의 기로에 선 인육무리들, 대흑암지옥마귀들로서의 이른바 지구지배계층놈들이 회생하기 위한 편법으로서 제안된 것으로서, 세종대왕을 악용하여 실제로는 제2차세계대전종결후 가난궁핍속에서 고통받아야 했던 무리들이 회생하게 된 이유가 되었음을 목격관찰하다. 세종대왕으로 인하여, 독일의 라인강기적이 왔으며, 일본경제의 부흥이 왔으며, 미국경제가 회생되었으며, 망해가던 대영제국이 다시 영연방으로 올라서는데 그 과정에서 이 대흑암지옥의 패역한 무리들이 그러한 일을 해준 세종대왕과 프리드리히대왕, 명치천황, 임경업, 이순신등을 모두 배후를 쳐서 살인하여 죽이고 이영애로 만든후 남경대학살에서 목을 잘라 참살하고, 현생하급하층민으로 대속되어 나자렛예수대속희생양으로 전락한 박종권이까지 죽이려 드는 사태로 파급되다로 목격관찰되다.(참조 : 제2차 세계 대전 이후 경제 팽창은 전후 경제 호황 또는 자본주의의 황금기[1][2]로도 알려져 있으며, 제2차 세계 대전의 여파와 함께 시작되어 1973~1975년 경기후퇴로 끝난 전 세계적인 경제 팽창 기간을 말한다.[1] 특히 미국, 소련, 오스트레일리아와 서유럽 및 동아시아 국가들은 완전 고용과 함께 이례적으로 높고 지속적인 성장을 경험했다.초기의 예측과 달리, 이 높은 성장은 일본(고도경제성장), 서독과 오스트리아(라인강의 기적), 대한민국(한강의 기적), 벨기에(벨기에의 경제 기적), 프랑스(영광의 30년), 이탈리아(이탈리아의 경제 기적) 및 그리스(그리스의 경제 기적)와 같이 전쟁으로 폐허가 된 많은 국가를 포함했다. 심지어 스웨덴(기록 시대)과 같이 전쟁의 영향을 비교적 덜 받은 국가들도 상당한 경제 성장을 경험했다.-> 이러한 경제회생기적은 근본적으로는 세종대왕의 선업공덕을 찬립한 결과로서, 20000인의 아르하트급박종권 복제복사를 통하여 독일의 경제부흥과 일본경제부흥이 성취되었음을 목격관찰하다. 이들의 원업과 원성품상 이와같은 일은 절대로 불가능했다. 독일은 프리드리히대왕, 일본은 명치유신의 명치천황에 의한 부흥이며 전전에는 이와같았으되 전후에는 이들의 허다한 중죄업(인육죄업,5대죄업등 무서운 죄업들)으로 인해 잘 먹고 잘 살고 선진부국이 된 다는 것이 아예 불가능했으나, 세종대왕을 내세워 이를 간신히 모면한 것으로 목격관찰되는데 다만 이 세종대왕조차도, 우중문이라는 놈이 제놈 주제에 하나님이 되겠다며 세종대왕을 때려죽이고 준성단급 품격과 등급, 선업공덕을 강제로 찬탈찬립하여 자행함으로서 종국에는 제3차세계대전이 발발하게 된 주요이유가 된 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이재용이 놈은, 루마니아왕조의 시조왕으로서 현재 차우셰쿠스놈이며, 이병철,이건희,이재용,박원규 이 네놈이 누리는 부귀영화와 영광은 이루 말로 표현할수 없었으나 이들을 이렇게 만들어준 주역들은 하급인축생인박종권으로 전락되어 음옥과 무간지옥 팔대구천지옥과 팔승지옥등 무서운 지옥을 떠도는 망령이 되었다. 이와같이 된 주요원인을 보면, 첫째는 부처로 알려진 잡놈인데 이 새끼가 해탈성불하기 위하여 박종권이를 부처인육대속을 자행했으며, 두번째는 나자렛예수인데, 우중문이 같이 무식무지미개한 놈으로서 영광의 하나님(준성단급)이 되겠다며 강제로 임의대속을 자행하여 골고다언덕에서 열두사도로 위장한 말데크인육룡들이 담합하여 때려죽인후, 영구죽음을 자행하고 이 글을 쓰는 하급하층민 축생급박종권으로 전락시킨후 이영애를 만들어 음옥에 처박은후, 다시 이 이영애를 이재용이 새끼를 시켜서 목을 잘라 죽인후 당고종놈에게 바치고, 양귀비를 만든후, 다시 측천무후가 된 당고모놈(바바라핸드클로우로서 아주 지적이고 참한 외계플레이아데스여성으로 위장, 박종권아르하트급의 좋은 것을 이영애를 죽이고 모조리 빼앗은 결과, 실제로 이 당고모라는 놈은 기미두자신이다. 마거릿힐다대처도 마찬가지로 기미두놈 그 자신인데, 이 씹새끼는 제놈의 현생아들 박종권이라는 것을 알면서도 무려 17번에 걸쳐서 칠천량해전맵과 남경대학살맵등에서 목을 잘라서 참살하여 죽이고 좋은 것을 빼앗으며 종국에는 마거릿힐다대처까지 된 놈으로 목격관찰되다. 이영애가 된 박종권이는 당고모놈 측천무후놈이 때려죽였으며, 이후 사지를 절단하고 변소측간에 처박은 것으로 목격관찰되다. 이와같이 잔인하고 흉포하고 간악한 놈들로서 절대로 인육주식하는 놈들과는 일을 해서는 안되며 동행해서도 안된다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 최초에 어떤 개새끼가 이런 프로젝트를 기안하고 실행했는지 반드시 시간의 제한없이 영구추적하여 밝히고 중처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것)이들 스스로는 이와같은 일을 할수 없다는 것이 매우 명백하다는 것이 목격관찰결과이다.이 호황은 냉전이 절정에 달했을 때 포스트모더니즘, 탈식민지화, 소비주의의 현저한 증가, 복지국가, 우주 경쟁, 비동맹 운동, 수입 대체 산업화, 1960년대 반문화, 제2세대 여성주의의 시작, 핵 군비 경쟁을 포함한 광범위한 글로벌 변화의 조건을 형성했다. 이와같은 일은, 한순조,동탁,장비,항우의 연장선상인 이건희놈과 박종권이의 현생거짓애비놈 박원규(원균이자 프타이며 아이젠하워이며 펠레콘이 된 놈, 나자렛예수의 거짓애비 성요셉역할을 한 말데크곤충룡, 말데크개룡)놈이 영구복락을 목적으로, 나자렛예수2차대속을 자행하려하여 사태가 이와같이 악화된 이유로 목격관찰되다. 이들은 인육주식하며 반우주마귀들로서 사람으로서 살아이영애를 당고종에게 바쳐 측천무후가 이영애를 때려죽이게 만든 놈이며 삼성그룹3대총수이자 당현종인 놈이 나자렛예수음모에 적극개입하여 열두사도놈으로 위장, 필립보가 되다. 개나 소나 전부 여호와가 된 이유), 헤르만괴링, 롬멜등 5인의 나치지도자놈들이 프리드리히대왕을 해코지하여 살해)오토 에두아르트 레오폴트 폰 비스마르크쇤하우젠 후작(독일어: Otto Eduard Leopold Fürst von Bismarck-Schönhausen, 1815년 4월 1일 ~ 1898년 7월 30일)은 독일을 통일하여 독일 제국을 건설한 프로이센의 외교관이자 정치인이다. -> 비스마르크시기부터 기미두놈이 독고신(히틀러)놈으로 개입하여 프리드리히대왕을 사라예보폭탄테러에서 죽였으며, 이에 대한 후유증으로 심각한 고통의 지옥에 감금되는데, 장소와 영역을 보면, 화성이었던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 화성에 도시가 건설되었으며 이는 영화 토탈리콜에 묘사된 것과 같으며, 한 시기 말데크악룡놈이 화성도시에서 살았던 것이 목격관찰되고, 이 시기의 화성 역시 오늘날의 지구와 동일한 체계로서 움직인 것으로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕시대는 이 화성으로 확장된다로 목격관찰되다. 화성과 해왕성 그리고 달은 서로 겹쳐지는바, 이 세군데가 모두 인육제조시설을 갖춘 인육주식장소로 목격관찰되다. 프리드리히대왕 사후 필사적인 탈출과정에서 고구려가 제안되는데, 고구려상장군이 바로 프리드리히대왕일계로 목격관찰되고 다시 을지문덕계가 임경업, 최배달과 일계로서 관찰되는데, 지금 기미두와 이건희,이재용이 놈이 마구잡이로 패죽이고 찢어죽이는 대상은 프리드리히대왕,고구려상장군을지문덕계로서의 임경업이며, 임경업이를 패죽이려고 자행하는 놈이 바로 조선선조 우중문이 놈과 이상노(광해군놈으로서 현생박종권이의 외삼촌이나 말데크촌수로는 동생놈 박종성이 놈임, 이양순이도 동생놈 박종성이고 박종성이가 분기하여 이노임, 이양순, 이상노, 이현순이 되는 과정에 목격관찰되다. 박종성이 놈은 현생동생이다.)로서 임경업이는 또 대우그룹 창업자와 연관되는데, 대우그룹을 잡고, 프리드리히도 잡으려는 목적으로 만든 캐릭터가 임경업으로 목격관찰되다. 그리고 임경업이는 정밀관찰시 박종권 나 자신이다. 박종권원본래를 때려죽이려고 제안된 캐릭터가 임경업이다. 그리고 그렇게 하는 놈이 외삼촌을 주장하는 이상노라는 놈인데, 이 새끼는 영국왕조지5세이자 조선광해군으로 목격관찰되고 이어서 육영수라는 잡년으로 목격관찰된다. 임경업의 경우, 내가 보건대, 이상노가 외삼촌이고 이중근이가 외조부로서 호감과 선의로서 돕고자 참여한 캐릭터이고 이유를 보면 왕을 하기에는 이상노가 부족했으므로 이것을 보완해주는 목적이었으나 이 패악패역한 놈들이 이를 악용하여 나를 죽인 것이다. 이게 내 외조부놈이고 내 외삼촌놈이며 내 어미,애비였다. 이 문제를 상부에 고소하고, 이들 전원을 재판에 회부하여 영구파문할것, 영구죽음처벌할것 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것. 특히 나의 원등급원지위원서열원신분상 직접무력폭력폭행구타는 거의 불가능한데도 마구잡이 구타폭력이 자행되는 이유는 부모자식관계로서 특히 박원규(기미두,아이젠하워)놈이며, 이 새끼가 직접무력폭행하는 놈으로서, 마거릿힐다대처라는 놈이 나를 직접 무력구타폭행한 이유가 바로 기미두놈이 마거릿힐다대처였기에 가능했던 것으로 목격관찰되다. 부모자식관계를 악용한 해코지를 엄중처벌하고 박원규,이복순을 영구파문할것, 영구추방할것, 함께 하지 않는다로 직권지시명령처리기록되다. 지속적처리할것 기존의 가족친인척관계 전체를 영구파문할것 단 한놈도 가족친인척이 아니며 단 한놈도 친구가 없었다로 전원영구파문할것 전원 함께 하지 않는다로 지속적처리할것 고통은 이건희같은 하등무식무지미개한 놈이 내가 했던 역할을 제놈이 한 것으로 처리하겠다며 들러붙어 있는 것에서 오는바, 이 자를 영구파문할것 영구죽음시킬것 지속적처리할것(기미두 동일, 우리가 관찰한바로는 미물버러지수준밖에 안되는 놈들로서 이들이 사는 초극렬지옥에서는 장군노릇을 할지 모르나, 상급상위상천계로 오면 졸지에 미물버러지로 전락되는 놈들로 목격관찰되다) Frederick II프리드리히 2세을지문덕(乙支文德The SakaSiddhartha GautamatheBuddha예수JesusofNazareth임경업(林慶業靈魂魄等級右側女子之眼 靈魂魄等級

나는그렇게하겠다고한적이없다殺格簒奪下剋上나로서여자가되어진놈confirmwithstar cluster'sways원등급+22(이십이)品格位格人格奸惡凶惡狡猾나의피땀원등급원지위을·를살인강탈하여극상부귀극상음락하는놈630128-1067814朴鐘權的大億劫的削的磨的滅的處理的이승만李承晚1875년 3월 26일 ~ 1965년 7월 19일왕주王主kingmonarchthe LordMental breakdown간악성 奸惡性이재용소원(所願)이재용李在鎔삼성그룹 제3대 총수당 현종 이융기구에르세리온가귀네드가마스라발가호엔촐레른지크마링겐가하인츠 빌헬름 구데리안Atlantìs nêsosAge of Atlantis World MapA map of AtlantisAtlantisATLANTIS150000B.C.Maldek惡竜Maldek毒蠬Maldek混蠬이재용李在鎔삼성그룹 제3대 총수당 현종 이융기구에르세리온가귀네드가마스라발가호엔촐레른지크마링겐가하인츠 빌헬름 구데리안바바라핸드클로우이건희李健熙삼성 제2대 총수항우項羽초 장왕중국공산당 중앙정치국 상무위원회정치국 상무위원에든버러 공작 필립 공헤르만 빌헬름 괴링조동봉위만하인리히 루이트폴트 힘러아틀라스박종성미마쓰대한민국전도 大韓民國全圖a complete map of Korea, a map of the whole of KoreaThe universe우주宇宙world map세계 지도世界地圖세계전도만국지도 지구 전체, 또는 대부분을 보여주는 지도Age of Atlantis World MapAtlantisAtlantìs nêsosA map of Atlantis630128-1067814朴鐘權증평공립국민학교The Making of Atlantis大韓民國忠淸北道槐山郡曾坪邑校洞里大韓民國忠淸北道槐山郡曾坪邑曾坪里우측목right sideneckthroatgullethead右側咽喉噲嗌嗓㗋嚨喖哙㗇肮咙喉門食氣顙吭𡃡𣣼𡁐𠽥𦞈𦞕𠺠𠾰𦝪𠰸𡲙𠼙㖶胭臙颃𠰉頏䑍脰齸亢㰺喉舌頸颈頚𩒤The universe우주宇宙world map세계 지도世界地圖세계전도만국지도 지구 전체, 또는 대부분을 보여주는 지도630128-1067814朴鐘權的大億劫的削的磨的滅的處理的630128-1067814朴鐘權的大億劫的削的磨的滅的處理的智力着想發想아이디어(idea)意圖意向意味義差別流轉緣起4%artman我2%Artman我나는가르쳐달라고한적이없다나는그렇게말한적이없다나는그렇게하겠다고한적이없다대연각호텔 대화재 사고대한민국의 IMF 구제금융 요청Age of Atlantis World MapA map of AtlantisThe Making of AtlantisAtlantìs nêsosAtlantis이순신李舜臣여성성(女性性)Femininity (also called womanliness)아틀란티스원신체Atlantìs nêsos源身體세종類似Atlantis準Atlantis我吾余予身𢦖偺民塊朕愚𣦶𠎳卬孤子𠨐魚厶台儂𢦓𩇶喒俺𦨶喒𨖍姎𢓲𠮣𣍹𢀹𦩎𦩗𠨂𩇶𦨶𨈟𢦠𢦐唔核心意識體身己幹肉形骨中躬室軀干魄躳臗骵躯躰䏱軆躸形軀體膚𣎑𡰬𩪆𨈬𢀒𩪍𨊘𡦆𨉦𨈴𦡊𦣂宮体宍人窮耦浴現在意識體身己幹肉形骨中躬室軀干魄躳臗骵躯躰䏱軆躸形軀體膚𣎑𡰬𩪆𨈬𢀒𩪍𨊘𡦆𨉦𨈴𦡊𦣂宮体宍人窮耦浴朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814戶籍謄本戶籍抄本住民登錄抄本275000B.C.朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814朴鐘權박종권630128-1067814戶籍謄本戶籍抄本住民登錄抄本575000B.C.‐2025A.D.大韓民國忠淸北道槐山郡曾坪邑曾坪里서울特別市 永登浦區奉天洞345番地서울特別市 永登浦區奉天洞347番地京畿道 水原市 勸善區 勸善洞서울特別市 銅雀區 舍堂路262 사당동(舍堂洞)1001-17호 304호 리빙캐슬원룸텔서울特別市 龍山區 靑坡路四七가길19-17(청파동3가)안시성 전투安市城 戰鬪우측목right sideneckthroatgullethead右側咽喉噲嗌嗓㗋嚨喖哙㗇肮咙喉門食氣顙吭𡃡𣣼𡁐𠽥𦞈𦞕𠺠𠾰𦝪𠰸𡲙𠼙㖶胭臙颃𠰉頏䑍脰齸亢㰺喉舌頸颈頚𩒤우측입右側口吻喙緌㗃肳𠙵𠮚咡㖧噭呅叭咼㚗喗𠲰𩔆𠱜凵喎啃𡁋囕㗪叼磭㗂呙㖞咁𣄮䙹㱉㗼𠶴𠹦䶠䶢㖟嘺哚𤿐𡆟𠪒𠳊髥𡄵琀舌戾翟吐咊听噳吧歍叽馕噆饢嘰우측턱右側頤顎頷颐頥頜㖤颔顄圅颌顊䫷颚䪶𦣝𩠡𦣞𩔞𦜆𩠛𩩂𩔓𩩊𩑪𩒫𩠢𦛜頙䏭䨨齕頉龁𪗟䪺顉頦颏䪹𦞞𦝣을지문덕(乙支文德, ?~?)고려 태조양만춘(楊萬春, ?~?)임경업林慶業이건희李健熙삼성 제2대 총수항우項羽초 장왕중국공산당 중앙정치국 상무위원회정치국 상무위원에든버러 공작 필립 공헤르만 빌헬름 괴링이재용李在鎔삼성그룹 제3대 총수당 현종 이융기구에르세리온가귀네드가마스라발가호엔촐레른지크마링겐가하인츠 빌헬름 구데리안조동봉위만하인리히 루이트폴트 힘러아틀라스박종성미마쓰증평공립국민학교칠천량 해전(漆川梁海戰) 또는 칠천 해전혁거세 거서간赫居世 居西干현생우주원신체現生宇宙源身體호엔촐레른지크마링겐가구에르세리온가구르세런보티건귀네드가디네부르가마스라발가웨일스 공(잉글랜드 왕세자)이영애(李英愛, 1971년 1월 31일~)입자 물리학의 입자기본 입자페르미온쿼크위(u)아래(d)맵시(c)기묘(s)꼭대기(t)바닥(b)렙톤전자(e−)/양전자(e+)뮤온(μ−/μ+)타우 입자(τ−/τ+)중성미자 전자 중성미자/전자 반중성미자뮤온 중성미자/뮤온 반중성미자타우 중성미자/타우 반중성미자보손게이지 보손 (광자W · Z보손글루온)스칼라 보손(힉스 보손)미관측 입자대통일 이론 등액시온(A0)마요론(J)X · Y보손W' · Z' 보손비활성 중성미자자기 홀극테크니컬러 관련 입자초대칭짝게이지노글루이노중력미자 (골드스티노)뉴트랄리노 (포티노힉시노지노)차지노 (위노힉시노)색시온액시노스페르미온스쿼크 (스칼라 위 쿼크, 스칼라 아래 쿼크, 스칼라 맵시 쿼크, 스칼라 기묘 쿼크, 스칼라 꼭대기 쿼크, 스칼라 바닥 쿼크)슬렙톤 (스엘렉트론, 스뮤온, 스타우온, 스뉴트리노, 스뮤온 스뉴트리노, 스타우 스뉴트리노)양자 중력 및 끈 이론중력자딜라톤라디온(중력스칼라)중력광자기타유령 입자골드스톤 보손타키온순간자합성 입자강입자중입자핵자(N) (양성자(p)중성자(n))Δ(델타)Λ(람다)Σ(시그마)Ξ(크시)Ω(오메가)맛깔없는 가벼운 중간자π(파이온)ρ(로)η(에타)·η′(에타 프라임)φ(피)ω(오메가)a(에이)b(비)f(에프)·f′(에프 프라임)h(에이치)·h′(에이치 프라임)맛깔없는 무거운 중간자J/ψ(제이/프시)ϒ(입실론)θ(세타)χ(키)ηc/b/t(에타 쿼코늄)hc/b/t맛깔있는 중간자K(케이온)DBT기타원자핵원자분자별난 원자 오늄포지트로늄뮤오늄 등펜타쿼크미관측 입자테트라쿼크글루볼중간자 분자준입자솔리톤엑시톤마그논포논플라스몬폴라리톤폴라론로톤목록기타 가설 입자무의식초자아트라우마방어기제정신분석게슈탈트 붕괴고전적 조건형성조작적 조건형성인지부조화바넘 효과심리 검사성격 검사초두효과설단 현상칵테일 파티 효과전경-배경 이론깨진 유리창 이론정보처리이론루시퍼 이펙트스탠퍼드 감옥 실험편안한 복제인간 증후군원인론목적론해석 수준 이론심리치료인문학재난심리학(disaster psychology)군사심리학(영어판)군중심리학자살 예방환경심리학깨진 유리창 이론범죄예방 환경설계심리역사학(영어판)로이드 드마우스(영어판)의상심리학(clothing psychology)의사소통(휴먼 커뮤니케이션)대인간 커뮤니케이션(영어판)잔소리 (심리)(영어판)편집성 인격 장애폭력 / 가정폭력아동학대 / 동물학대힐가드와 애트킨슨의 심리학 원론(Atkinson & Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology)볼더 모델찰스 다윈심리학역사심리학자연구 분야감정생물심리학임상심리학인지심리학인지 신경과학비교심리학비판심리학문화심리학발달심리학진화심리학실험심리학개인심리학해방심리학수리심리학매체심리학약물심리학신경심리학수행심리학성격심리학생리심리학정치심리학긍정심리학심리언어학정신병리학정신물리학심리생리학정성적 심리 연구정량적 심리 연구사회심리학이론심리학교육심리학군중심리학스포츠심리학프시응용 분야심리 실험임상심리학상담심리학교육심리학법정심리학건강심리학산업 및 조직 심리학법심리학산업 건강심리학관계심리학학교심리학스포츠심리학음향심리학체제심리학심리철학시각심리학접근 방법분석심리학행동주의인지주의인지 행동 치료기술심리학실존주의 상담가족 치료인지 정서 행동 치료여성주의 상담게슈탈트 치료인본주의심리학초심리학이야기 치료정신분석학정신 역동 치료초개인심리학주요 심리학자버러스 프레더릭 스키너장 피아제지그문트 프로이트오토 랑크멜라니 클라인앨버트 반두라레온 페스팅거로이 샤퍼칼 로저스스탠리 샤흐터닐 엘가 밀러에드워드 손다이크에이브러햄 매슬로고던 올포트에릭 에릭슨한스 아이젠크윌프레드 비용윌리엄 제임스데이비드 맥클랜드앨버트 엘리스아론 벡레이몬드 캐텔존 B. 왓슨쿠르트 르빈도널드 올딩 헤브조지 밀러클라크 헐제롬 케이건카를 융이반 파블로프앙드레 그린알프레트 아들러사회과학주류경제학 거시경제학미시경제학계량경제학수리경제학법학 공법학사법학법계학법제사학판례학사학 경제사학군사사학문화사학사회사학세계사학정치사학역사보조학사회학 농촌사회학도시사회학범죄학인구통계학인터넷사회학언어학 기호학인류학 고고학문화인류학사회인류학체질인류학정치학 국제관계학비교정치학정치철학공공정책학지리학 기술지리학인문지리학자연지리학환경지리학응용개발학경영학군 경영학행정학계획학군 토지이용계획연구지역계획연구도시계획연구공중보건학과학기술학과학철학군 경제철학사회과학철학심리철학역사철학교육학기술사학과학학군 과학사학양자과학학사회복지학상업학언론정보학역사사회학인간동물학인지과학인류생태학정보과학정치경제학정치사회학정치생태학젠더학지역과학지역학환경학군 환경사회과학환경연구문화연구미디어연구세계화연구식품연구지역연구채식연구해부학뼈대뼈몸통뼈대 머리뼈척추가슴우리팔다리뼈대 팔뼈대다리뼈대골수연골유리연골섬유연골탄력연골관절섬유관절연골관절윤활관절근육계골격근민무늬근심장근내분비계뇌하수체시상하부솔방울샘갑상샘부갑상샘가슴샘부신이자정소난소순환계심혈관계심장혈관 동맥정맥모세혈관대동맥대정맥폐동맥폐정맥혈액 혈장적혈구백혈구혈소판림프계림프관림프절비장가슴샘편도파이어판점막관련림프조직비뇨계콩팥요관방광요도생식계남성고환부고환정관정삭요도정낭전립샘망울요도샘음낭음경귀두포피여성난소자궁관자궁질질입구주름음문대음순소음순젖샘소화계소화관입인두식도위작은창자 샘창자공장회장큰창자 맹장결장곧은창자항문소화샘침샘이자쓸개간신경계중추신경계 뇌척수말초신경계 몸신경계자율신경계 교감신경계부교감신경계눈귀코혀피부계피부모낭땀샘피지샘손발톱유방호흡계비강인두후두기관기관지허파외분비계땀샘망울요도샘스킨샘젖샘전립샘전미골부샘점액정낭침샘코딱지큰질어귀샘생물학의 주요 분야생물학의 분야계생명학고생물학고유전학균학기생충학동물학면역학미생물학발생생물학 (발생학)병리학보전생물학분류학분자생물학분자세포유전학생리학생물리학생물정보학생물통계학생태학생화학세포생물학세포유전학수리생물학시간생물학식물학신경과학약리학역학우주생물학유전체학유전학위생학인간생물학조직학진화생물학해부학해양생물학생물학의 가설들자연발생설Personality disorder classificationGeneral classificationsDimensionalCategoricalMulti-axialPrototypalRelationalStructuralICD classifications (ICD-10)SchizotypalSchizotypalSpecificAnankastic personality disorderAnxious (avoidant)DependentDissocialEmotionallyunstableHistrionicParanoidSchizoidOtherEccentricHaltloseImmatureNarcissisticPassive–aggressivePsychoneuroticOrganicOrganicUnspecifiedUnspecifiedDSM classificationsDSM-III-R onlySadisticSelf-defeating (masochistic)DSM-IV onlyPersonality disorder not otherwise specifiedAppendix B (proposed)DepressiveNegativistic (passive–aggressive)DSM-5Cluster A (odd)ParanoidSchizoidSchizotypalCluster B (dramatic)AntisocialBorderlineHistrionicNarcissisticCluster C (anxious)AvoidantDependentObsessive-compulsiveOtherOther specifiedUnspecifiedAlternative DSM-5 Modelfor Personality DisordersSpecificAntisocialAvoidantBorderlineNarcissisticObsessive-compulsiveSchizotypalGeneralTrait SpecifiedvteMental disorders (Classification)Adult personality and behaviorChildhood and learningMood (affective)Neurological and symptomaticNeurotic, stress-related and somatoformPhysiological and physical behaviorPsychoactive substances, substance abuse and substance-relatedSchizophrenia, schizotypal and delusionalSymptoms and uncategorized시시비비 是是非非right and[or] wrong불문곡직without inquiring into the right or wrong敗輪敗tolose(agame)tobedefeatedtofailsuccessorfailuretodefeattotarnishtoruintodestroytosquanderafamilyfortunetohaveone'sreputationdestroyedtocorruptpublicmoralstowitherandfallwitheredbranchesandleavesThechrysanthemumshavewithereddilapidatedworn-outofclothingtatteredworncottonwooltorotrottentoremovetogetridof輪wheelgeartricyclecargoshipedgerimtotaketurnstoworkinshiftsIt'syourturnI'vewaitedforovertenminutesnowandit'sstillnotmyturnthisisridiculoustowaitforone'sturntoqueueforpublichousingClassifierforthesunortheroundmoonabrightmoonaredsunClassifierforroundssecondroundoftalksacycleofChinesezodiactwelveyearstogang-rape飼敎飼tofeedtoraise敎toteachtoinstructtocausetomakeetc較贖較tocomparetocompetecomparativelyrelativelyratherbetterthanintroducestheobjectofcomparisonMy salaryismorethanmyparentsobviousclearmoreevenmorenomatterhow贖toredeemtoransomwashingawayyoursinclearingyourdebtbyofferingmoneywealthoreffort源本來體源等級體630128-1067814朴鐘權現在體現在流體now體past體present體current體up to now體Self-knowledge(psychology)Self-imageSelf-conceptSelf-schemaPersonalityTheoriesNeural basis of selfSelf-categorization theoryProcessesSelf-perception theorySelf-awarenessSelf-reflectionSelf-consciousnessValue judgmentSelf-esteemTrue self and false selfAs applied to activitiesSelf-assessmentSelf-efficacyInterpersonalSelf-disclosureSelf-concealmentSocialPersonal identity (philosophy)Identity (social science)Collective identitySocial identity theoryIn-group and out-groupSocial identity threatPoliticsIdentity politics / Respectability politicsPolitical identityRight to personal identity反獸獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血智獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血性獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數口品血人獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血精獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血忄青獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血道獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數衆肉血道獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血智獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血面獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血忄青獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血位獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數人肉血格獵田獀猟𤢪𤡗𤟫㹵狩㺈甸蒐猎獦獠㹩𤢸𤢙䝤𩊦術數